From Court Document Service to Foreclosure Intervention: 7 New Laws Affect Florida's Judicial System
The changes affect reimbursement for Florida Supreme Court justices, notarized documents and foreign-language court interpreters, among other issues.
June 11, 2019 at 01:57 PM
4 minute read
With a flurry of signatures Friday, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis approved at least seven pieces of legislation that will leave a mark on Florida's legal system.
Here's what you need to know:
From July 1, Florida Supreme Court justices with permanent homes outside Leon County will be able to request a district court of appeal courthouse, county courthouse or other facility as their official headquarters, under House Bill 5011. They'll also be eligible for an allowance and travel reimbursement for each day or half day they're at the Supreme Court building, at a rate decided by the chief justice.
The bill adds that a county doesn't have to provide space in courthouses for a justice, but it can enter into an agreement with the Supreme Court over the use of its space — which can't be leased using state funds.
After Oct. 1, 2019, SB 910 will open certain military veterans and court programs up to veterans who've been discharged for any reason, along with current and former U.S. Department of Defense contractors and military members of a foreign allied country.
Anyone who seeks medical attention for a minor after giving them alcohol or drugs will not be arrested, charged, prosecuted or penalized as long as they stay at the scene and cooperate with police and medical staff, according to CS/HB/595, which goes into effect Jul. 1.
Legal requirements for Florida businesses will shift in January 2020, under CS/HB 1009, which tacks on extra rules to ensure companies adhere to the Florida Business Corporation Act and Revised Limited Liability Company Act.
Thanks to CS/HB 49, state correctional facilities will give female prisoners health care products after July 1. These include feminine hygiene products, moisturizers, toothpaste, toothbrushes and others under the Dignity for Women Act. The new law also mandates that, unless there's an emergency, male correctional staff can't do pat-down or body cavity searches on female prisoners and can't enter places where women are likely to be undressed, like bathrooms and showers. If they do, it will need to be documented.
Security background investigations will become mandatory for foreign-language court interpreters and mediators after July 1, according to CS/HB 7081, which means they'll have to pay to have their fingerprints taken and sent to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement.
The law also authorizes digital fingerprints and other electronic records of criminal judgments, and creates an exception to the rule that all communications between parties going through parenting coordination — a non-adversarial dispute resolution process in child custody cases — remain confidential. Any testimony or evidence that can be used to report, prove or disprove professional malpractice or misconduct will no longer stay confidential, and anyone appointed or employed by the Supreme Court to work on disciplinary proceedings against parenting coordinators won't be liable for civil damages unless they act maliciously or in bad faith. Instead, the court will establish minimum standards and procedures to train parenting coordinators.
Notarized documents will go online with the passage of CS/HB 409, which also outlines new rules for password protection and tamper-evident technologies that the Department of State must adhere to by Jan. 1, 2020.
Effective immediately, CS/HB 1656 dictates that reenactments or changes to criminal statutes will operate ”prospectively” — meaning they won't apply to final judgments based on crimes and penalties from before the statute was enacted, except in particular circumstances.
Effective immediately, CS/HB 91 lessens the burden of serving defendants with a complaint, taking away the need for a process server agent to indicate all the initial pleadings a person is being served with. It also removes the need for them to complete an affidavit listing the time, manner and place of service.
The law also clarifies procedure for filing a motion to intervene in a foreclosure case. Whereas interventions had to be done within 30 days, legislators tightened the language to stress that only a motion to intervene needs to be filed in that time, not a court order as well.
Read more:
Attorney Fees Take a Hit Under New Florida Law
Small Claims Just Got Bigger: Florida Gov. Approves Bill Raising County Court Limit to $30K
'Daubert' Evidence Standard Takes Immediate Effect in Florida After High Court Turnaround
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Which Legal Tech Jobs Are on the Rise, and Which Aren't, with Jared Coseglia
- 2Absent Explicit Agreement, Court Rejects Unilateral Responsiveness Redaction of Text Messages
- 3SEC Whistleblower Program: What to Expect Under the Trump Administration
- 4Sidley Hires Paul Hastings Energy Finance Partner in Houston
- 5Potential Pitfalls in Arbitrating Religious Disputes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250