New Administration Building on Tap Under Miami Deal With Developer
Developer Adler Group and the city are ready to finalize a complex deal to deliver a new city administration building and three residential towers.
June 11, 2019 at 12:14 PM
5 minute read
Miami could be getting a new public administration building next to an existing one on the Miami River in 2023 if city commissioners finalize a development deal.
The proposal calls for a minimum 230,000-square-foot, 20-story office building and an adjacent 1,000-space parking garage with about 700 spaces for the city and the remainder for the developer.
Miami-based Adler Group LLC and the city are on the cusp of finalizing a deal for construction of the administration building and up to three residential buildings.
The project is set for nearly 5 acres northeast of the river Interstate 95 and south of Southwest Third Street.
The City Commission is set to vote on agreements June 27 after action was initially scheduled for Thursday's meeting.
The project dates back to at least 2016 when the city noted its staff operations were outgrowing the Riverside Center at 444 and 460 SW Second Ave. Miami issued a call for developers in February 2016 and picked Adler by year-end.
The two-part solicitation offered construction of the new city office and the sale or lease of the property where the Riverside Center now sits.
“What the city was looking for was the ability to try to monetize their current site on the river to get money from that to help pay for the new headquarters,” said Adam Mait, vice president of acquisitions and development for Adler Group.
Deal Intricacies
The complex deal involves a land swap. Adler affiliate Lancelot Miami River LLC owns a 1.6-acre vacant lot at 230 SW Third St. north of the city's 2 acres at 444 SW Second Ave. and 1.1 acres at 460 SW Second Ave. The city lots are the sites of the Riverside Center and its garage.
Under the new proposal, Adler would lease the two Riverside Center lots and build its project there, while the city would buy the western portion of Adler's lot at 230 SW Third St. for the office.
Adler plans to lease from the city for about six years and then buy the property for $69.4 million, said Mait, Adler's acquisitions and development vice president.
“It's all dependent on market conditions, and I certainly don't know from today, five, six years out what the market is going to look like,” he said. “But I do believe we have the intent to purchase it likely early on in the term versus significantly later.”
The annual rent would start at $3.62 million and increase 1.5% per year. In the sixth year, the rent would be the greater of the rent with all the annual increases or 3% of gross revenues. Adler also would pay a 2% capital transaction fee.
At the same time, the city would buy land from Adler for the office building, and Adler would be the development manager for a 4% fee of actual expenditures.
The city expects its new office and garage to cost about $140 million, which might be funded through a bond or other forms of financing.
Adler's plans to start its project with a 36-story apartment tower with 300-400 units just east of the new administration building on Adler's lot.
After that, it would build two condominium towers at 50-60 stories on the two city lots, although that plan may change down the line, Mait said.
Adler also must improve the pubic river walk along the site, pay a living wage and price 10% of its units at workforce housing rates. Mait said at least some of the workforce housing would be in its apartment tower.
Construction on the administration building would start within a year. and that building and the apartment tower should open in 2023, Mait said.
Commissioners are to consider a lease agreement for the city lots as well as a development management and construction agreement with Adler. Also, they are to vote on issuing $150 million in financing to cover the office development.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1What Does Ohio Supreme Court's Opioid Decision Mean for Public Nuisance Claims?
- 2Bucking Industry Trend, Sidley Austin Elects Biggest Class of Partners in Firm History
- 3US Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
- 4‘Really Deflating’: Judges React to Biden Threat to Veto New Judgeships Bill
- 53 Incidents Lead to Charges Against the Alexander Brothers; Cousin Remains at Large
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250