Akerman Partner Joseph Rebak Prevails in Legal Malpractice Suit Dating Back to Tew Cardenas Era
The Akerman partner was accused of professional negligence while representing a client at his former law firm Tew Cardenas.
June 13, 2019 at 04:26 PM
3 minute read
Florida's Third District Court of Appeal has ruled in favor of an Akerman partner who'd been accused of legal malpractice by a former client of his previous firm.
The appellate court affirmed Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Jennifer Bailey's order granting attorney Joseph Rebak's motion for summary judgment against Florida business FBK Associates.
Rebak and his former firm, the now-dissolved Tew Cardenas, were named in a 2014 suit filed by FBK, alleging the attorney was negligent in his legal representation of the company in a federal lawsuit against SunTrust Bank. According to an amended complaint filed by the plaintiff, Rebak purportedly failed to introduce critical testimony and witnesses during arbitration proceedings between FBK and the bank, causing his client to only be awarded $255,000 rather than the millions of dollars they regarded as reasonable compensation from prior litigation. FBK also contended the attorney's failure to hire a court reporter played a part in their smaller-than-expected award.
The motion for summary judgment on liability filed by the defense argued the alleged negligence was the result of ”tactical decisions protected under the doctrine of judgmental immunity” and that Rebak's conduct rose to the standard of care expected of attentive legal counsel.
“The decision to not have a court reporter present at the arbitration was part of plaintiff's strategic plan and therefore cannot subject firm to liability,” the motion said. “The strategy of not hiring a court reporter severely limited the noteholders' opportunity to later oppose Plaintiff's reimbursement and compensation from the trust (assets).” The defense also referenced the plaintiff's own admission ”that FBK had no firm agreement with SunTrust for reimbursement of legal fees” in its request for the court to enter a final summary judgment in its favor.
Tew Cardenas shut its doors in April 2014, following the death of firm co-founder Thomas Tew earlier that year. A court order issued in July 2017 held that Rebak could collect on $147,978.90 from FBK with interest. FBK's attorney, Crabtree & Auslander partner John Crabtree, declined to provide a statement on the appellate court's opinion and the underlying case. Neither Rebak nor his appellate counsel, Cole, Scott & Kissane founding partner Scott Cole, responded to requests for comment by press time.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Trending Stories
- 1Daniel Habib to Serve as Next Attorney-in-Charge of NY Federal Defender Appeals Unit
- 2Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege in the Modern Age of Communications
- 3High-Profile Sidley M&A Partner Heads to Covington
- 4Stars and Gripes: Firms Need a 'Superstar Culture' to Crack the U.S. Market
- 5BCLP Exploring Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250