DeSantis Redistributes Election Security Money to Stop Hackers
The Republican governor announced he is redistributing $2.3 million in election security money that went unspent by county elections supervisors last year.
June 18, 2019 at 12:32 PM
4 minute read
A month after learning Russian hackers breached elections systems in two Florida counties in 2016, Gov. Ron DeSantis said his administration is focused on identifying “any vulnerabilities” ahead of next year's elections.
The Republican governor announced he is redistributing $2.3 million in election security money that went unspent by county elections supervisors last year. The funds are in addition to $2.8 million for elections cybersecurity Florida lawmakers earmarked in the state budget for the upcoming fiscal year beginning July 1.
“This has become an issue in the last couple of months in a way that I did not, and really nobody, appreciated,” the governor told reporters at a Monday press conference.
The unspent money from the 2018 election cycle will be redistributed to 61 of the state's 67 counties. The additional $2.8 million will be given to those with the most critical needs, according to Secretary of State Laurel Lee.
“No county stands alone against foreign threats to Florida's elections. Every Floridian can have confidence in the integrity of our elections and the security of their vote,” said Lee, who joined DeSantis at Monday's event in the Capitol.
When asked how the funds will be distributed, DeSantis said, “The money is designed to address the needs that are there, and so there may be needs that may not necessarily be equal.”
The effort to beef up elections security comes a month after DeSantis was told by the FBI that Russian hackers targeted Florida's election systems in 2016. The intrusion did not result in any manipulation of voter data, DeSantis told reporters on May 14.
“There was no manipulation, or anything, but there was voter data that was able to be got,” DeSantis said at the time. “Now, that voter data I think was public anyway. Nevertheless, those were intrusions. It did not affect any voting, or anything like that.”
DeSantis and other members of his administration met with the FBI following the release of Special Counsel Robert Mueller III's report that said a Russian intelligence agency gained access to at least one Florida county government computer network in 2016.
DeSantis said he had signed a nondisclosure agreement that barred him from identifying the two counties, but the Washington Post and Politico subsequently reported that rural Washington County in the Panhandle was one of the targets. Washington County is among the 61 counties that will receive a share of the election security funds, according to a list distributed by Lee's office Monday.
DeSantis on Monday said the Department of State is collaborating with county elections officials in preparation for the 2020 elections. If any weaknesses are found, the governor said he would inform the public on a case-by-case basis only.
“There are different things that we're going to be doing to try to test vulnerabilities, and if we identify a vulnerability, that is not going to be something that's going to be put out, because we'd be telegraphing to our adversaries, 'Hey, this is where Florida is weaker,' ” DeSantis said.
Monday's announcement about the election security money also comes as Lee's office launches a joint cybersecurity initiative with the counties, which she called an “historic partnership.” DeSantis ordered Lee to conduct an assessment of the counties' elections systems shortly after the revelations about the Russian hack surfaced.
Lee said the cybersecurity assessment will include elections systems as well as the “potential for human vulnerabilities.” Her office will also be monitoring county elections networks, she said.
The public's faith in elections is “a cornerstone of our democracy,” DeSantis told reporters Monday.
“We will take every step necessary to preserve the integrity of our infrastructure,” he said.
Ana Ceballos reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRogge Dunn Represents Florida Trucking Firm in Civil RICO Suit Against Worldwide Express
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250