Florida's Health Care 'Shared Savings' Off to Slow Start
The idea of the shared-savings programs is to give policyholders an incentive to look for cheaper health services.
June 18, 2019 at 12:56 PM
4 minute read
If people are willing to shop for cars and homes to save money, they'd be willing to shop around for their health care, right?
If early results of “shared savings” programs in Florida's state-employee health insurance program are any indication, the answer actually could be no.
The early results show that despite efforts to publicize the programs, they have had little impact on the $2.6 billion health care program for current and former state employees.
The idea of the shared-savings programs is to give policyholders an incentive to look for cheaper health services. State employees receive rewards after the services have been delivered and claims paid.
As of May 21, $63,000 in rewards had been earned by employees who enrolled in what is known as the Healthcare Bluebook program, according to the Florida Department of Management Services, which oversees the employee health insurance.
David Frady, the department's communications director, did not have the number of employees who used the program but said 428 different services, such as X-rays and MRIs, were booked and paid for.
State employees who want to shop around for surgical care can use a program called SurgeryPlus. The latest available data show that six procedures have been completed through the program and that another three have been scheduled. Files have been opened, Frady said, on another 46 potential surgical procedures.
The less-than-robust performance has occurred despite the Department of Management Services' efforts to advertise the options. Gov. Ron DeSantis in March ordered the agency to “get as many people plugged into that as possible.”
Frady said the department has been working closely with agency human resource directors to distribute educational materials to employees on the availability of the programs. The department has also included information about Healthcare Bluebook on its People First website, which is the portal for state employee benefits.
Since March, the department has held 49 in-person presentations, and webinars have been offered “reaching thousands of employees.”
Meanwhile, the state has paid companies involved in the programs far more than what employees have been able to attain in rewards.
Healthcare Bluebook has been paid $1 million since October 2018, according to a state financial website. The contract is worth a total of $3.6 million. Direct Employer Healthcare, which operates as SurgeryPlus, has been paid more than $462,500 for the concierge-type services that help people shop for and procure surgical services. The overall contract with Direct Employer Healthcare is for $4.2 million.
DeSantis has touted shared-savings programs similar to the ones in the state-employee insurance plan as an attractive option to help lower overall health care costs. Along with House Speaker Jose Oliva, R-Miami Lakes, DeSantis supported a bill (HB 1113), which seeks to spur insurance companies to begin offering similar options to customers.
DeSantis signed the legislation into law last week. The law, which takes effect July 1, allows insurers to offer shared savings options to their customers. Insurers would have to return at least 25% of any generated savings to the customers.
Enrollment in the programs would remain voluntary.
DeSantis expressed confidence that consumers will take advantage of the offerings because they'd be getting back a portion of the savings.
“The transparency is great, but why would I want to go shop online if it makes no difference to me as a consumer?” DeSantis said during an appearance last week in Jacksonville. “If it's just saving an insurance company money, I think a lot of patients would rather just have their time to themselves rather than doing this.”
Christine Sexton reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAmid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readFreeman Mathis & Gary Taps Orlando for Third New Florida Office This Year
3 minute readFla.'s Statute of Limitations and Statutes of Repose in Med Mal Cases: It's Not Over Until It's Over
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250