Miami Law Firm Targets Trivago in Helms-Burton Lawsuit
The suit is the fifth suit filed in the U.S. and the sixth worldwide since Cuban Americans were given the green light to sue for land seized by the Cuban government after the country's revolution in 1959.
June 19, 2019 at 03:24 PM
4 minute read
Miami-based law firm Rivero Mestre has sued travel website Trivago, alleging the company benefited from property expropriated by the Cuban government after the Cuban revolution.
On May 2, President Donald Trump gave the green light for lawsuits to be lodged against companies using land confiscated by Cuba after 1959.
The plaintiffs, Marisela Mata and Bibiana Hernandez, are descendants of Antonio Mata y Alvarez, who built the San Carlos hotel in Cienfuegos in 1925 and left after the government led by Fidel Castro appropriated the hotel in 1962.
Because Trivago offers booking services to the San Carlos hotel, which is now operated by Spanish hotelier Meliá, the firm alleges that Trivago and its parent company Expedia have “benefited from the San Carlos.” Title III of the Helms-Burton Act defines trafficking as one who “sells, transfers, distributes, dispenses, brokers, manages or otherwise disposes of confiscated property.”
According to case filings, Trivago provides online bookings to 125 properties in Cuba. The company “facilitate[s] the booking of hotel rooms, airline seats, car rentals and destination services from … travel suppliers.”
The lawsuit also gives Expedia a 30-day notice of intent to sue. Rivero Mestre partner Jorge Mestre said that the firm decided to give notice instead of suing now because companies given a months' notice are subject to triple damages.
“It tells companies that if you don't make me whole, on day 31 I can sue you for three times the amount of damages,” Mestre said.
Trivago did not immediately comment on the lawsuit.
Rivero Mestre had already targeted companies involved in the operation of the San Carlos hotel. On May 20, it filed a suit against the hotel and its operators on behalf of the Mata family, including Grupo Hotelero Gran Caribe, Corporación de Comercio y Turismo Internacional Cubanacán S.A., Grupo de Turismo Gaviota S.A. and Corporación Cimex S.A.
A similar notice of intent to sue was given to Spanish hotelier Meliá in the original suit, and Mestre said the firm will “absolutely go forward” with the litigation. The firm has several other lawsuits in the works as well, he said.
“We are pleased to have brought the first claim of this type under the statute,” Mestre said. “Nobody has done this. We are thinking about it creatively.”
Mark Migdal & Hayden name partner Don Hayden, who previously headed up Baker McKenzie's Miami office, said the suit will hinge on just how broadly the courts choose to define “trafficking.” This is the first time the law has been implemented so there is no precedent.
“[Trivago] isn't the present user, but they're third parties that are doing business with the property owners,” Hayden said. “If something like this is found to have legs, it will open the door to a lot of litigation.”
Despite experts warning of a flood of litigation in the wake of the activation of Title III of Helms-Burton, there had been only four Helms-Burton suits filed in the U.S. The Trivago suit is the fifth. Observers point to the difficulty of bringing these complex cases as well as the significant financial and geopolitical obstacles in filing a case of this nature.
Trivago is a publicly traded German company, majority-owned by the Expedia Group. Carnival Cruise Lines is the only U.S. company to have been hit with a Helms-Burton suit so far.
In Spain, Meliá also was hit with a $11.24 million lawsuit this week — filed by U.S. citizens who are descendants of former Cuban businessman Rafael Lucas Sánchez Hill. The Spanish newspaper El Confidencial reported that it was the first lawsuit ever filed in Spain by Cuban Americans against Spanish companies that benefited from expropriated properties in Cuba.
But it is not clear to what extent a lawsuit filed in Spain may have value in the United States. European legislation has rejected the extraterritorial nature of the law and Spanish authorities continue to defend Spanish investments in Cuba.
|Related Stores:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMorgan & Morgan Looks to Grow Into Complex Litigation While Still Keeping its Billboards Up
6 minute readLost in the Legal Maze: How State Regulations Are Hindering Hemp Operators' Success
7 minute readFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
- 2Dallas Jury Awards $98.65M in Botham Jean Killing by Dallas Officer
- 3In Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
- 4Pharmaceutical Patents: Benefits and Challenges
- 5Where Do Web-Tracking Class Actions Belong? 8th Circuit Weighs the Issue
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250