Miami's Magic City Innovation District Could Displace 3,000+ Little Haiti Households, Study Says
A report released by Magic City Innovation District opponents a week before the City Commission takes its final vote on the project lays out the gentrification costs of developments this size.
June 21, 2019 at 03:47 PM
6 minute read
Projects the size and scope of the Magic City Innovation District eventually could push out more than 3,000 households in Miami's Little Haiti. Collectively, these families would pay $68 million over 10 years in relocation-related expenses, a new study says.
Magic City Innovation District opponents released the report in a push against the proposal. They also held a protest Thursday, a week before the Miami City Commission is set to take its final vote.
City officials need to further research the proposal's social and environmental impacts, concluded the study by Earth Economics, a Tacoma, Washington-based nonprofit research organization.
The study was commissioned by opposition groups—Community Justice Project Inc., a nonprofit legal services organization outside Little Haiti and founded by attorney Meena Jagannath, and the Family Action Network Movement, a Haitian women's advocacy organization based in Little Haiti.
Earth Economics conceded that direct impacts from Magic City are uncertain, but it added that combined with other projects, gentrification definitely will follow in Little Haiti.
The economically struggling but culturally rich neighborhood already has caught the eye of real estate speculators and investors, stirring fears among the community of gentrification and erosion of the area's character.
A household gentrified out of Little Haiti could pay $5,200, which includes immediate costs for moving and loss of wages because residents had to miss work to look for new homes, the study said.
The report assumes residents would be moving to North Miami, North Miami Beach and Sweetwater, all areas farther from employment centers than Little Haiti, hence up to $2,500 annually in additional transportation and other costs. Little Haiti residents who already have left the neighborhood generally have relocated to these three cities.
Altogether, these costs amount to an additional 10% of a Little Haiti household's income, a hefty increase for a neighborhood where the median income is $24,800, the report says.
The Magic City development team called the study a detraction from a detailed plan they say would uplift the community.
“It's unfortunate that activists are trying to detract from a project that has been developed alongside residents and leaders of the Little Haiti community for over two years to ensure that the proposed … master plan embraces the rich culture of Little Haiti and helps all members of the community to grow and thrive together,” Neil Fairman, chairman of project partner Plaza Equity Partners, said in an emailed statement.
Plaza Equity Partners is working with Metro 1, both of which are real estate firms, and the Dragon Global venture capital company on the over 8 million-square-foot development across 17 buildings. The team also includes big-name project investor Guy Laliberte, the founder of Cirque du Soleil.
They say they already have invested in the community through the Magic City Innovation District Foundation, including supporting local youth sports teams and holding a summer camp and small business training for Little Haiti residents.
The project would be a boon for Little Haiti as it would infuse $188 million annually to area businesses from the foot traffic the district would prompt. On a larger scale, Miami would benefit as well, receiving more than $80 million in permit and impact fees and an additional $27 million in property tax revenue, Fairman said. A third of the tax revenue would be for local schools.
In community meetings and media interviews, the development team consistently has brought up one main point: In Miami, the affordable housing issue isn't because rents are rising but it's because incomes are remaining stagnant. The Magic City Innovation District would change this by not only creating over 11,680 jobs but also skills training mainly in the technology, creative and communication fields.
The project will rise on 18 acres on lots developers have assembled roughly from Northeast Second Avenue east to the Florida East Coast Railway tracks, and from the Little Haiti Soccer Park south to the Little Haiti Cultural Center
|Back and Forth
About 20 protesters gathered Thursday afternoon in front of the Toussaint Louverture Memorial Statue along North Miami Avenue in Little Haiti.
Part of their chant—”Tragic City, you must fail. Little Haiti is not for sale. From Palestine to Little Haiti, these settlements have got to go.”—was a play on words between “Magic City” and “Tragic City.”
The back-and-forth between the two sides has been ongoing, with tensions most recently boiling over at a recent community meeting.
A point of contention has been the developers scrapping an initial plan to build 184 affordable and 368 workforce housing units. Instead, they say they will put $31 million to a city-created Little Haiti Revitalization Trust with a board directing the money to new affordable and workforce housing, education, business growth, parks and road improvements.
Opponents have said the amount is not enough to mitigate the impact of the project and that it won't address the disruption to the everyday lives of Little Haiti families.
Developers have said they will incorporate Little Haiti's cultural fabric, pointing to a project plan that shows different parts of the development named Les Ateliers, Les Bureaux and Les Residences.
That's a “mockery of all that the Haitian people and the residents of Little Haiti have fought to accomplish,” resident Jessica Saint-Fleur said at the protest.
Opponents have raised issue with the scale of the project, where some buildings could reach 24 stories in an area with one and two-story homes and warehouses.
The developers' attorney, Akerman partner Neisen Kasdin, has countered that the tallest buildings would be in the center of the project.
The Earth Economics study also cited potential environmental effects, such as the loss of trees and grass and the creation of an urban canyon effect. That occurs when an area is developed with high-rises that prevent the circulation of wind, creating a heat island effect, the study said.
Fairman countered that the project actually would create more than twice the amount of open, green space the city requires.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250