Miami Lawyers Land $70M Verdict Against Biopharma Company Over Technician's Asbestos Exposure
Marc P. Kunen and Jose Becerra of the Ferraro Law Firm in Miami argued that a former South Florida lab technician contracted terminal cancer after being exposed to asbestos at work.
June 24, 2019 at 03:16 PM
5 minute read
Marc P. Kunen and Jose Becerra of the Ferraro Law Firm in Miami secured a $70 million jury verdict for 71-year-old Charles E. Thornton, a former lab technician who claimed he contracted mesothelioma after being exposed to asbestos at work.
Thornton worked for biotech company Nabi Pharmaceuticals in Broward and Miami-Dade counties between 1976 and 2010. His job in the fractional department involved separating plasma from blood using biopharmaceutical equipment. But some of those tools contained asbestos, according to Thornton's March 2017 products liability lawsuit.
Asbestos is a naturally occurring group of minerals made of silicon and oxygen. For decades its microscopic flexible and fireproof fibers lent themselves to various uses, including pipe and roofing insulation — until it was eventually discovered to be a silent killer.
Asbestos is banned in more than 55 countries, but not in the U.S. Though the Environmental Protection Agency banned certain uses of it in 1973 and barred it from most products in 1989, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned that in 1991. As a result, the ban only covers new uses of asbestos, and decades of litigation has followed. In 2019, the EPA introduced a rule that says discontinued asbestos products can't be reintroduced into commerce without evaluations and restrictions in place.
In 2016, Thornton was diagnosed with mesothelioma, a cancer in the lining of his lungs. Kunen and Becerra alleged this came from exposure to asbestos while performing maintenance work on his separating equipment, designed and manufactured by defendant New Jersey-based GEA Mechanical US Inc.
“Being exposed to asbestos ultimately causes the mutations that led to the cancer, mesothelioma, which is an incurable cancer, so it's always terminal,” Kunen said.
The disease presents itself as a painful cough, with chest pain, shortness of breath and lumps of tissue under the skin, and always kills its victims.
The complaint initially tagged various defendants, but GEA Mechanical, which supplies technology and equipment for food processing across the country, was the only one left standing at trial.
Thornton accused GEA Mechnical of negligence and strict liability, alleging the company knew or should have known about the harm its products could cause, but never told Thornton and failed to put proper warnings on packaging.
|
Click here to read the complaint
Kunen took the lead at trial in Miami-Dade Circuit Court, claiming the defendant let Thornton down by failing to properly test its products and purposely misled the public with its advertising.
GEA Mechanical argued it wasn't at fault and claimed asbestos wasn't the cause of Thornton's cancer. In its answer to the complaint, the company argued that any contact with asbestos-containing materials in its products “would be so slight that it would not be a substantial factor in causing or contributing to” Thornton's mesothelioma.
Counsel to the defense, Stuart A. Weinstein of Shapiro, Blasi, Wasserman & Hermann in Boca Raton, did not respond to emails and calls seeking comment by deadline.
Kunen called epidemiologist Dr. Murray Finkelstein, who used his specialization in pulmonary medicine to explain how asbestos damaged the plaintiff's lungs. Pathologist and pulmonologist Dr. Richard Kradin expanded on that, giving jurors a sense of how end-stage mesothelioma was taking its toll on the plaintiff.
Thornton's wife Constance, 70, has been married to him for nearly 40 years and claimed loss of consortium as she'll lose her husband's emotional and financial support when he dies.
The evidence, as Kunen saw it, “weighed heavily” in his clients' favor, and he says the most important thing became their well-being during a two-week trial.
“Making sure that Mr. Thornton was doing well and that his wife was doing well during the trial, that was the most important thing for us,” Kunen said.
On Jun. 17, jurors found GE Mechanical was negligent in causing Thornton's illness. They awarded $102,000 for past medical expenses, gave Thornton $50 million in pain and suffering damages and his wife $20 million.
The verdict is one of South Florida's largest asbestos-related verdicts, but Kunen pointed out it doesn't change Thornton's diagnosis.
“The verdict is bittersweet,” Kunen said. “Obviously, we're pleased with the results, but the reality is that Mr. Thornton is still suffering from this devastating cancer and it's ultimately going to take his life.”
|Read the jury verdict:
|Case: Charles E. Thornton, Constance Thornton v. GEA Mechanical Equipment US
Case No.: 2017006018CA01
Description: Products liability
Filing date: March 13, 2017
Verdict date: June 17, 2019
Judge: Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Jose Rodriguez
Plaintiffs attorneys: Marc P. Kunen and Jose L. Becerra, The Ferraro Law Firm, Miami
Defense attorneys: Stuart A. Weinstein, Shapiro, Blasi, Wasserman & Hermann, Boca Raton
Verdict amount: $70,102,000
More verdict stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Tampa Jury Returns $5.8M Verdict Against Insurer Who Denied Coverage
2 minute readEven the Chief Judge Noted the Cost of This Broward Case
Marriott's $52M Data Breach Settlement Points to Emerging Trend
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250