Diversity Is So-So at Personal Injury Law Firms in South Florida
Personal injury law, an enclave of small firms, faces no more than societal pressure to reflect its multicultural community. In South Florida, the 10 largest personal injury firms have 10 to 44 attorneys by an informal count of attorneys listed on websites.
June 27, 2019 at 06:00 AM
6 minute read
Robert Rubenstein makes diversity look effortless.
He runs Rubenstein Law, the largest South Florida personal injury firm by attorney head count at 44. Half of the attorneys at his Miami-based law firm are women, 39% are Hispanic and 14% are black.
Rubenstein, who started at Greenberg Traurig as a corporate attorney, offered personal experiences to explain his firm's leading role. He opened the firm when Miami's Bankers Club barred women and the Riviera Country Club in Coral Gables didn't allow Jewish members in the 1980s.
“I raised three girls, so maybe that gave me some head start on understanding how bright women are,” he said. His firm has advertised on Spanish-language television since opening in 1988, and it has a Spanish-language website. At one point, the firm counted attorneys and staff from 23 countries.
That's against a backdrop of increased focus on diversity in the legal profession. Federal district judges are pushing plaintiffs firms to place women and minorities in leadership positions in multidistrict litigation, and bankruptcy judges want to see more diversity in debtors counsel.
Personal injury law, an enclave of small firms, faces no more than societal pressure to reflect its multicultural community. In South Florida, the 10 largest personal injury firms have 10 to 44 attorneys by an informal count of attorneys listed on websites.
The firms start small as a rule with the founding partner or a group of like-minded litigators generating $1 million-plus verdicts and settlements. Gender diversity is often the first to be reflected in new hiring, and statistics indicate racial and ethnic diversity follows at a slower rate.
“Every firm needs to look at the makeup of their firm and make sure that diversity is a key factor,” said Lake “Trey” Lytal, a co-founder of 14-attorney Lytal, Reiter, Smith, Ivey & Fronrath in West Palm Beach. “Without diversity in a firm, you're not mirroring the community that you're working for.”
Judd Rosen of the 13-attorney Goldberg & Rosen firm in Miami said a Hispanic woman was the first attorney hired outside his family. He said the firm's hiring reflects its diverse client base and “the diverse city that we live in.”
Overall, Rubenstein Law is the most diverse personal injury firm based in South Florida and the only one with Hispanics in double-digit numbers.
By gender, Rubenstein is half female, and Lytal Reiter is 43% female. But combined, the 10 largest firms are only 30% female.
About 20% of attorneys are Hispanic, which sounds impressive except the Hispanic population is 69% in Miami-Dade County, 30% in Broward County and 23% in Palm Beach County. Rubenstein leads at 39% followed by Goldberg & Rosen at 38% and the Ferraro Law Firm in Miami at 36%.
Rubinstein and Lytal Reiter tie at 14% for black attorneys, below the rates for the African American and Caribbean population.
Heads of some smaller firms are not focused on diversity aside from citing their staff numbers. Scott Schlesinger of the Schlesinger Law Offices in Fort Lauderdale said he doesn't consider his 10-attorney team to be statistically significant in terms of diversity.
Leaders at personal injury firms stress minority hiring is skill-driven, not tokenism or window dressing for juries seated in South Florida's melting pot.
“It's not enough just to say I hired a bunch of minority people. You've got to give them the opportunity to succeed,” Rosen said.
|In Trial
Trial team selections are not tied to the diversity of plaintiffs or juries, several law firm leaders said.
“I don't think it's enough to just have diverse people sitting by you at the table if they don't know what they're doing,” Rosen said. “It's nice if they can bring a culturally diverse persona to the case, but at the end of the day you've still got to perform.”
Rubenstein said, “We don't really try to match ethnicity. We just try to hire the best people.” As for juries, he said, “Don't assume that they want somebody who looks like them.”
Since the firm normally goes to trial with two-attorney teams, the firm accommodates and encourages women to take paid maternity leave, Rubenstein said. “We can always step in and help if somebody goes out on maternity leave.”
Lytal noted some of his firm's diverse attorneys have held leadership positions in affinity bars and the Florida Bar. Jason McIntosh is president of the F. Malcolm Cunningham Sr. Bar Association, a voluntary group founded by black attorneys in Palm Beach County in the 1970s, and Nelson Baez is a former president of the Palm Beach County Hispanic Bar Association.
Lytal is immediate past president of the Florida Justice Association, the state's largest plaintiffs bar group. He was succeeded by a woman, and she will be succeeded by a woman.
Some firms lacking in diversity still push to encourage it in the professional pipeline. Steinger, Greene & Feiner, with three white male founders and 13% Hispanic attorneys, offers a national scholarship to Hispanic law students. One recipient joined the 38-attorney West Palm Beach firm but not in its personal injury department. The firm's website speaks to its niche: injurylawyers.com.
Rubenstein stresses his firm's case assignments are not driven by diversity, but the firm's diversity influences applicants.
“They appreciate that we're a diverse firm. When they come to the firm, they see that there are so many different people from so many different areas,” he said. “This is a great place to find a lot of great people.”
The community itself exerts subtle pressure on law firms to get more diverse.
Lytal said, “I don't think there's any question that of anywhere in the country, South Florida ought to be leading the charge with diversity at law firms.”
|Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllActions Speak Louder Than Words: Law Firms Shrink From 'Performative' Statements
6 minute readFlorida Hurricane Relief—IRS Offers Extended Deadlines and Tax Benefits
4 minute readAgainst the Odds: Voters Elect Woody Clermont to the Broward Judicial Bench
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 2Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 3McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
- 4Amazon, SpaceX Press Constitutional Challenges to NLRB at 5th Circuit
- 5Schools Win Again: Social Media Fails to Strike Public Nuisance Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250