Defense Promises Gagged Roger Stone's 'Lonely Voice Presents No Threat'
In one post, the longtime Trump adviser wrote, "The truth is emerging. #NoCollusion."
June 27, 2019 at 06:54 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
The criminal defense team for longtime President Donald Trump ally Roger J. Stone Jr. argued he shouldn't be held in contempt for violating a gag order with Instagram posts about his case because “his lonely voice presents no threat to a fair trial.”
In a response filed Thursday, Stone's lawyers called the government's motion asking U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in Washington to hold a hearing a ”disproportionate response” to Stone exercising his First Amendment rights — within the confines of her gag order.
Stone tagged The New York Times, Washington Post, CNN and other national media outlets in his June 18 and 19 social media posts, which included screenshots of stories about his case, referred to special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation as the “Russia Hoax,” alleged government corruption and reported on his defense claims that the FBI refused to share emails from CNN from the day he was arrested at his Fort Lauderdale home before dawn.
In one post, Stone wrote, “The truth is emerging. #NoCollusion.”
Federal prosecutors called that a “fanning of the flames” that risked turning the trial ”into a circus” and could even taint how prospective jurors look at evidence in his case.
Related story: Roger Stone 'Continues to Fan the Flames' Despite Gag Order, Prosecutors Say
Stone's attorneys challenged that argument, suggesting the government might be afraid of what was in the articles Stone shared.
“The government's focus on three Stone posts exhibits a willful blindness to the tens of thousands of hostile-to-Stone articles which have been authored by others about the 'investigation' and Stone's 'case,' ” the defense said.
The filing lists articles, cartoons, TV shows and radio shows that it claims prejudiced Stone, including Steve Martin's parody of him on “ Saturday Night Live,” and calls the government's motion ”oxymoronic.”
“The 2,402 'likes' of the June 18-19 Stone postings are but a speck compared to the torrent of publicity, commentary and commotion generated by persons, publications and politicians over which, and over whom, Stone has no control,” according to the response submitted by Fort Lauderdale attorney Chandler Routman, a member of the District of Columbia Bar.
Fort Lauderdale attorneys Bruce Rogow and Tara Campion represent Stone with Grant Smith of StrategySmith and Robert Buschel of Buschel & Gibbons.
L. Peter Farkas of Halloran Farkas + Kittila in Washington also is on the defense team.
Jackson previously warned Stone about social media posts. In February, the judge barred him from speaking publicly about this case, the special counsel investigation and anyone associated with them. The order stemmed from an Instagram post of Stone's depicting Jackson's head next to what looked like the cross-hairs of a gun.
Stone's January indictment accused him of obstructing justice, witness tampering and lying to congressional investigators looking into Russian meddling in the 2016 election.
Read the court filing: [falcon-embed src="embed_1"]
Related story: Roger Stone's Lawyers Were in Court Today. It Didn't Go Well
Roger Stone Is Bench Slapped, Gagged Over Hostile Instagram Post
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250