Defense Promises Gagged Roger Stone's 'Lonely Voice Presents No Threat'
In one post, the longtime Trump adviser wrote, "The truth is emerging. #NoCollusion."
June 27, 2019 at 06:54 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
The criminal defense team for longtime President Donald Trump ally Roger J. Stone Jr. argued he shouldn't be held in contempt for violating a gag order with Instagram posts about his case because “his lonely voice presents no threat to a fair trial.”
In a response filed Thursday, Stone's lawyers called the government's motion asking U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in Washington to hold a hearing a ”disproportionate response” to Stone exercising his First Amendment rights — within the confines of her gag order.
Stone tagged The New York Times, Washington Post, CNN and other national media outlets in his June 18 and 19 social media posts, which included screenshots of stories about his case, referred to special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation as the “Russia Hoax,” alleged government corruption and reported on his defense claims that the FBI refused to share emails from CNN from the day he was arrested at his Fort Lauderdale home before dawn.
In one post, Stone wrote, “The truth is emerging. #NoCollusion.”
Federal prosecutors called that a “fanning of the flames” that risked turning the trial ”into a circus” and could even taint how prospective jurors look at evidence in his case.
Stone's attorneys challenged that argument, suggesting the government might be afraid of what was in the articles Stone shared.
“The government's focus on three Stone posts exhibits a willful blindness to the tens of thousands of hostile-to-Stone articles which have been authored by others about the 'investigation' and Stone's 'case,' ” the defense said.
The filing lists articles, cartoons, TV shows and radio shows that it claims prejudiced Stone, including Steve Martin's parody of him on “ Saturday Night Live,” and calls the government's motion ”oxymoronic.”
“The 2,402 'likes' of the June 18-19 Stone postings are but a speck compared to the torrent of publicity, commentary and commotion generated by persons, publications and politicians over which, and over whom, Stone has no control,” according to the response submitted by Fort Lauderdale attorney Chandler Routman, a member of the District of Columbia Bar.
Fort Lauderdale attorneys Bruce Rogow and Tara Campion represent Stone with Grant Smith of StrategySmith and Robert Buschel of Buschel & Gibbons.
L. Peter Farkas of Halloran Farkas + Kittila in Washington also is on the defense team.
Jackson previously warned Stone about social media posts. In February, the judge barred him from speaking publicly about this case, the special counsel investigation and anyone associated with them. The order stemmed from an Instagram post of Stone's depicting Jackson's head next to what looked like the cross-hairs of a gun.
Stone's January indictment accused him of obstructing justice, witness tampering and lying to congressional investigators looking into Russian meddling in the 2016 election.
Read the court filing: [falcon-embed src="embed_1"]
|Related story: Roger Stone's Lawyers Were in Court Today. It Didn't Go Well
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Families Settle Court Battle Over Who Owns Parkland Killer's Name, Likeness
4 minute readCOVID-19 Death Suit Against Nursing Home Sent to State Court, 11th Circuit Affirms
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 5Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250