The Keys to Financing: Helping Your Client Obtain a Mortgage for a Florida Condo
Condo financing presents unique challenges. The lender not only has to approve the borrower's creditworthiness, but also must approve the condominium itself.
July 02, 2019 at 09:14 AM
6 minute read
If you have a client looking for a mortgage loan to purchase or invest in a Florida condominium, be prepared.
Condo financing presents unique challenges. The lender not only has to approve the borrower's creditworthiness, but also must approve the condominium itself.
If the condo is too new or risky, lenders will likely decline to extend a mortgage.
Lenders may also balk if your client is a foreign national from a country perceived as risky, such as Cuba, Russia or Venezuela.
However, these are not necessarily dead ends.
As the real estate attorney, you have several opportunities to help your client get to the closing table. For instance, you can try to get the condo on the “approved list,” thereby making your client eligible for conventional or government loans.
Armed with the right knowledge, you can be a valuable liasion for the realtors, potential lenders, condo association and other parties involved.
Lingo: 'Warrantable Condos' vs. 'Nonwarrantable Condos'
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) have guidelines requiring condominiums to satisfy certain criteria to be eligible for its loan programs.
Condos meeting the guidelines are considered “warrrantable.” This means borrowers are eligible for conventional or government loans, and lenders can sell off the loans to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, the FHA or the VA.
On the other hand, condos that fail the guidelines are considered “nonwarrantable.” For loans on these condos, lenders are not able to sell them off. Therefore, as a practical reason, many lenders stay away from nonwarrantable condos.
To be deemed warrantable under the guidelines, the condo must meet certain requirements such as:
- One person or entity does not own a large percentage of the units;
- The majority of the units are owner-occupied;
- The condo does not allow short-term rentals;
- There is adequate insurance coverage;
- There are sufficient budget reserves for repairs;
- There is a low percentage of unit owners delinquent in their association assessment fees;
- No fraud has been committed by officers of the association; and
- There is no serious litigation by or against the association that could result in costly legal fees.
How Do I Determine if a Condo Is Warrantable or Nonwarrantable?
There are online lists that you can check to see if the condominium is warrantable:
- FHA: https://entp.hud.gov/idapp/html/condlook.cfm
- VA: https://vip.vba.va.gov/portal/VBAH/VBAHome/condopudsearch
- Fannie Mae: https://www.fanniemae.com/singlefamily/project-eligibility-review-service
- Freddie Mac: While Freddie Mac does not provide a list of approved condos, if the condo is on the Fannie Mae or FHA approval list, it likely meets Freddie Mac's guidelines as well.
If the condominium is on these lists as approved, the borrower is eligible for conventional and government loans.
If the condominium is not on these lists, do not despair. Take note that, in Florida, very few condos are on the approved lists. For example, in Miami-Dade County, there are only seven FHA-approved condos.
There are still options to consider for nonwarrantable condos.
Try Getting the Condo Changed From Nonwarrantable to Warrantable Status
You can consider trying to get the unapproved condominium approved.
For example, if your client is interested in a FHA or VA loan, you can work with the developer, association, lender, mortgage broker or other interested party to submit the necessary paperwork to try to get the FHA or the VA to give the condo its stamp of approval.
If your client is interested in a conventional loan, you can work with the association to complete Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's standardized “Condominium Project Questionnaire.”
Here's how the condo questionnaire process works:
- The association provides details about the condominium, including basic project information; project completion information; financial information; ownership information; and insurance information.
- Once the association returns the questionnaire, the lender's underwriters analyze the information to determine the condo's eligibility for mortgage financing purposes.
- If the underwriters determine that the condo meets Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac's guidelines, the condo is deemed warrantable, and the lender can offer your client a conventional loan.
- If not, the condo is deemed nonwarrantable, and the lender will not be able to extend a conventional loan to your client.
Helpful tips for condo questionnaires:
- Make sure you submit the condo questionnaire to the association very early on, so that the lender can determine as soon as possible whether the condo meets Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac's guidelines.
- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac offer two kinds of condo approval processes—limited review and full review. The limited review entails a shorter condo questionnaire. However, limited review is only available for established condos (not new condos), and your client must make higher down payments.
- In Florida, under the limited review process, the required down payments are particularly high—25% for principal residence, and 30% for second home or investment home.
Ultimately, if it is not possible to get the condo approved, you can help your client search for an alternative lender that specializes in mortgages for nonwarrantable condos, such as portfolio lenders and non-QM lenders. These lenders are willing to take on more risk.
Also, these alternative lenders, unlike traditional banks, are willing to lend to borrowers who are foreign nationals of particularly risky countries such as Cuba, Russia, Venezuela and other countries listed under the Office of Foreign Assets Control's (OFAC) sanctions programs.
Conclusion
Finding financing for condominiums in Florida—especially when foreign national borrowers and nonwarrantable condos are involved—is particularly tricky. However, with an understanding of the process and a dash of patience, you can help make the dream of owning that condo a reality.
David A. Krebs is president of DA Krebs Inc. in Miami. He originates residential loans in Florida and commercial mortgage loans nationwide. Contact him at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLeveraging the Power of Local Chambers of Commerce: A Second-Career Lawyer’s Guide to Building a Thriving Practice
5 minute readCFPB Proposes Rule to Regulate Data Brokers Selling Sensitive Information
5 minute readEssential Labor Shifts: Navigating Noncompetes, Workplace Politics and the AI Revolution
Trending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250