The Keys to Financing: Helping Your Client Obtain a Mortgage for a Florida Condo
Condo financing presents unique challenges. The lender not only has to approve the borrower's creditworthiness, but also must approve the condominium itself.
July 02, 2019 at 09:14 AM
6 minute read
If you have a client looking for a mortgage loan to purchase or invest in a Florida condominium, be prepared.
Condo financing presents unique challenges. The lender not only has to approve the borrower's creditworthiness, but also must approve the condominium itself.
If the condo is too new or risky, lenders will likely decline to extend a mortgage.
Lenders may also balk if your client is a foreign national from a country perceived as risky, such as Cuba, Russia or Venezuela.
However, these are not necessarily dead ends.
As the real estate attorney, you have several opportunities to help your client get to the closing table. For instance, you can try to get the condo on the “approved list,” thereby making your client eligible for conventional or government loans.
Armed with the right knowledge, you can be a valuable liasion for the realtors, potential lenders, condo association and other parties involved.
|Lingo: 'Warrantable Condos' vs. 'Nonwarrantable Condos'
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) have guidelines requiring condominiums to satisfy certain criteria to be eligible for its loan programs.
Condos meeting the guidelines are considered “warrrantable.” This means borrowers are eligible for conventional or government loans, and lenders can sell off the loans to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, the FHA or the VA.
On the other hand, condos that fail the guidelines are considered “nonwarrantable.” For loans on these condos, lenders are not able to sell them off. Therefore, as a practical reason, many lenders stay away from nonwarrantable condos.
To be deemed warrantable under the guidelines, the condo must meet certain requirements such as:
- One person or entity does not own a large percentage of the units;
- The majority of the units are owner-occupied;
- The condo does not allow short-term rentals;
- There is adequate insurance coverage;
- There are sufficient budget reserves for repairs;
- There is a low percentage of unit owners delinquent in their association assessment fees;
- No fraud has been committed by officers of the association; and
- There is no serious litigation by or against the association that could result in costly legal fees.
How Do I Determine if a Condo Is Warrantable or Nonwarrantable?
There are online lists that you can check to see if the condominium is warrantable:
- FHA: https://entp.hud.gov/idapp/html/condlook.cfm
- VA: https://vip.vba.va.gov/portal/VBAH/VBAHome/condopudsearch
- Fannie Mae: https://www.fanniemae.com/singlefamily/project-eligibility-review-service
- Freddie Mac: While Freddie Mac does not provide a list of approved condos, if the condo is on the Fannie Mae or FHA approval list, it likely meets Freddie Mac's guidelines as well.
If the condominium is on these lists as approved, the borrower is eligible for conventional and government loans.
If the condominium is not on these lists, do not despair. Take note that, in Florida, very few condos are on the approved lists. For example, in Miami-Dade County, there are only seven FHA-approved condos.
There are still options to consider for nonwarrantable condos.
|Try Getting the Condo Changed From Nonwarrantable to Warrantable Status
You can consider trying to get the unapproved condominium approved.
For example, if your client is interested in a FHA or VA loan, you can work with the developer, association, lender, mortgage broker or other interested party to submit the necessary paperwork to try to get the FHA or the VA to give the condo its stamp of approval.
If your client is interested in a conventional loan, you can work with the association to complete Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's standardized “Condominium Project Questionnaire.”
Here's how the condo questionnaire process works:
- The association provides details about the condominium, including basic project information; project completion information; financial information; ownership information; and insurance information.
- Once the association returns the questionnaire, the lender's underwriters analyze the information to determine the condo's eligibility for mortgage financing purposes.
- If the underwriters determine that the condo meets Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac's guidelines, the condo is deemed warrantable, and the lender can offer your client a conventional loan.
- If not, the condo is deemed nonwarrantable, and the lender will not be able to extend a conventional loan to your client.
Helpful tips for condo questionnaires:
- Make sure you submit the condo questionnaire to the association very early on, so that the lender can determine as soon as possible whether the condo meets Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac's guidelines.
- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac offer two kinds of condo approval processes—limited review and full review. The limited review entails a shorter condo questionnaire. However, limited review is only available for established condos (not new condos), and your client must make higher down payments.
- In Florida, under the limited review process, the required down payments are particularly high—25% for principal residence, and 30% for second home or investment home.
Ultimately, if it is not possible to get the condo approved, you can help your client search for an alternative lender that specializes in mortgages for nonwarrantable condos, such as portfolio lenders and non-QM lenders. These lenders are willing to take on more risk.
Also, these alternative lenders, unlike traditional banks, are willing to lend to borrowers who are foreign nationals of particularly risky countries such as Cuba, Russia, Venezuela and other countries listed under the Office of Foreign Assets Control's (OFAC) sanctions programs.
|Conclusion
Finding financing for condominiums in Florida—especially when foreign national borrowers and nonwarrantable condos are involved—is particularly tricky. However, with an understanding of the process and a dash of patience, you can help make the dream of owning that condo a reality.
David A. Krebs is president of DA Krebs Inc. in Miami. He originates residential loans in Florida and commercial mortgage loans nationwide. Contact him at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
4 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1$1.9M Settlement Approved in Class Suit Over Vacant Property Fees
- 2Former Wamco Exec Charged With $600M 'Cherry-Picking' Fraud
- 3Stock Trading App Robinhood Hit With Privacy Class Action 1 Month After Alleged Data Breach
- 4NY High Court Returns Fired Priest's Discrimination Claim to State Agency
- 5Digging Deep to Mitigate Risk in Lithium Mine Venture Wins GM Legal Department of the Year Award
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250