Etan Mark Stays Steady in the Changing Tides of Legal Sea
In addition to practicing complex commercial litigation, the Mark Migdal & Hayden partner has accumulated a diverse resume through the years, including stints in the public sector and as an enterprising businessman.
July 03, 2019 at 04:06 PM
8 minute read
Etan Mark isn't shy about discussing his failures. Long before founding the Mark Migdal & Hayden law firm with attorneys Josh Migdal and Don Hayden, Mark served as the CEO of iDiligence, a business built on outsourcing legal services, such as document review, to attorneys in India.
“It seemed like a very obvious opportunity for clients to benefit from that kind of a model,” Mark said, noting the similarities between the U.S. and India's common law systems as well as the sometimes pricey billings that accompany the most basic of legal work. But two years into the endeavor, Mark found himself running out of funds and burning the candle on both ends. He admitted he “was not getting the traction” that he'd been hoping for and opted to close up shop rather than fight fate.
“I had to cut my losses and call it a day,” he said. Even when dealing with disappointment, Mark's ability to change tack and face the unfamiliar has followed him throughout his legal career. Mark Migdal & Hayden's status as a boutique law firm specializing in complex commercial litigation has allowed Mark to position himself in an area of constant change and challenge. Where some might find the high stakes of the firm's work daunting, sudden changes in circumstance have defined the litigator's life long before he ever stepped into a courtroom.
Mark grew up in an Orthodox Jewish household and resided in Brooklyn, New York, until the age of 10 when his parents separated. With his mother now living in Manhattan as his dad remained in Brooklyn, he split his time between his two parents and the disparate boroughs. Even with a childhood spent in as cosmopolitan an area as New York City, Mark quipped he experienced “a little bit of a culture shock” once he was accepted to the University of Michigan and found himself far from the Jewish community in which he'd been immersed.
“Oh my god there's all these blondes, non-Jews,” he quipped, mocking his younger self. Upon graduating with a double major in political science and religion, Mark took his talents to Washington, D.C., where he attended the George Washington University Law School with the aim of pursuing a life in politics. However, after interning for the House Judiciary Committee under New York congressman and now-House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, Mark decided he did not want to go into politics, having found the whole process to be “grotesque.”
“I think I went into law school very, very naive about politics, about public service, and about the incentives for people to do certain things out of law school,” he said. Mark was particularly disquieted by the business of lobbying and the compensation afforded to government employees. “We so grossly underpay our public servants, whether it be the people who are doing pro bono legal work, whether it's the people who are working for the government in either the state or the federal capacity, across the board.”
Mark's newfound uncertainty about his career pushed him on the path to becoming a litigator. “Law schools are very heavily geared towards training [students] to be courtroom lawyers,” he noted. After earning his J.D., he spent two years back in his native New York City as a business and securities litigator with Weil, Gotshal & Manges. Mark wound up meeting his wife, Brielle, during his time with the firm, and their relationship soon brought them to Miami.
“She's from Miami so, the rest is history,” Mark said. Despite the stark differences between New York and Miami's respective temperaments — “I can get a wedding dress and batteries but I couldn't get a turkey sandwich,” he joked about downtown Miami — he soon got his sea legs working as a law clerk in the Southern District of Florida under Chief Judge K. Michael Moore. It was after his clerkship that he pursued his iDiligence venture, followed by a nine-year stint at Berger Singerman. By the time he left the firm in 2017, he had worked his way up through the ranks to become the co-head of its dispute resolution team and earn the title of partner. Although he cites firm co-chair Paul Singerman as a mentor, his time at the office wasn't without its own set of difficulties.
“The expectations are hard, you're dealing with very stressed attorneys all the time, very demanding clients. … Civil litigation, especially high end commercial litigation, you're usually dealing with wealthy clients, highly paid attorneys, and as a result of that things are pretty contentious all the time,” he said. However, Mark is ardent in stressing that if it weren't for the trials and tribulations he's contended with, he wouldn't be experiencing the joy of heading up his own law firm or working alongside his partners.
“These are people that every day I learn from, and I wake up every morning realizing how little I know about my job,” he said of firm co-founders Migdal and Hayden. “One of the very core tenets of this firm is we are only going to work with people we want to work with. Do you have to be an excellent attorney? 100 percent. But if you are not a very good human being … this is not the right place for you. And thank God I'm now in a position where I have some ability to control who it is that I work with.”
The independence and flexibility afforded by Mark Migdal & Hayden has enabled Mark to work on a number of notable cases, including serving as counsel to a prospective class of plaintiffs in a federal suit against dietary supplement company Herbalife. Mark explained the firm is representing contracted distributors persuaded by Herbalife to pour money into company events.
“Herbalife puts on these events … they're called Circle of Success events,” Mark said. “And they really compel these individual distributors [into] chasing these events because they're told, 'You have to come to the event, it's an incredible opportunity. You're going to make all this money. You're going to drive a corvette like me. You're going to live in a $3 million house like him.'”
He continued, “[Herbalife] catches these people who tend to be a little bit more on the vulnerable fringes of society, and these people throw all their money into this. … And as a result of that they lose everything.”
Despite the demands of his chosen occupation and the accumulated weight of the past, Mark is hoping Mark Migdal & Hayden can set an example on how to imbue a degree of levity into the legal profession.
“My wish is that lawyers would stop taking themselves quite so seriously,” he said, remarking attorneys “are lucky to be able to exercise our brains every day.”
“I think that we are on the cusp of a really exciting time in the practice of law,” he added. “Because of changes in technology, because of this infiltration of the millennial culture to law firms — which I view as largely a positive thing — which is really driving changes in law firm management, and of course the renewed pressure from clients to make sure that lawyers are truly providing value. We're at the sort of crest of the wave here. It's an exciting time to be a lawyer and I think lawyers need to stay positive, and we need to stay excited about what it is we do. And I just think maybe, we should try to be a little bit nicer to each other if possible.”
Etan Mark
Born: December 1978, Brooklyn
Spouse: Brielle Mark
Children: Charlotte, Oliver
Education: George Washington University, J.D., 2003; University of Michigan, B.S., 2000
Experience: Partner, Mark Migdal & Hayden, 2017-present; Certified Fraud Examiner, Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, 2010-present; Trustee, HistoryMiami, 2010-present; Trustee, Temple Beth Sholom, 2009-present; Partner, Berger Singerman, 2008-2017; Member, Eleventh Judicial Circuit's Grievance Committee, 2009-2012; CEO, iDiligence, 2006-2008; Law clerk, United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, 2005–2006; Business and securities litigator, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, 2003-2005.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGrowing Referral Network, Alternative Fees Have This Ex-Big Law’s Atty’s Bankruptcy Practice Soaring
5 minute readAgainst the Odds: Voters Elect Woody Clermont to the Broward Judicial Bench
4 minute readMiami Civil Judge Myriam Lehr to Say Goodbye to the County Court Bench
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Commission Confirms Three of Newsom's Appellate Court Picks
- 2Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 3GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 4'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 5Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250