Spreading the Word: What to Know Before You Advertise
Before you spend a dime—or thousands of dollars—on advertising, however, remember that The Florida Bar has the final word on what can be said in any legal services advertisements.
July 03, 2019 at 10:05 AM
4 minute read
A good marketing plan is a multifaceted document. Done well, it should incorporate traditional and social media, eNewsletters and blogs, public and media relations, and website development.
Another potentially important marketing discipline is paid media, or advertising.
Before you spend a dime—or thousands of dollars—on advertising, however, remember that The Florida Bar has the final word on what can be said in any legal services advertisements.
Between bar rules and reaching your audience, consider these tips before planning or releasing any advertisements:
Who is watching? Think about who you're trying to reach. If you rely on referrals from other lawyers, accountants or professionals, advertise in their trade or industry publications. If targeting potential clients, consider local, consumer-oriented publications.
Tailor the message. Use meaningful and deliberate language and imagery when crafting your ads. From language to fonts to the images used, tailor ads so your practice area, from personal injury or medical malpractice to family law, for example, speak to your audience. Avoid legal jargon in consumer ads, though it may be appropriate for peer-to-peer advertising.
Match your message with your media. How the ad looks should align with where it will run. Available ad style or space for television, print, online or social media will vary in size, style, font and graphics, and messaging. Since the smaller the ad space, the less room you have to work with, do not crowd the given space. Create multiple versions of the same ad for different platforms and publications. Whatever you choose, make it stand out. In media full of ads, a memorable ad will drive phone calls.
Think campaigns. Repetition drives recognition; one-time ad placements rarely do. Creating a “campaign” is critical to market resonance. Negotiate a deal with your media sales representative that will drive up frequency at a reduced cost. The more often someone sees an ad, the more likely they are to remember you when seeking a lawyer—or talking with someone who is.
Socially secure. Social media posts must also abide by rules set by The Florida Bar. While a lawyer's personal social networking profiles used strictly for social purposes are not subject to regulation, pages intended to promote the lawyer or firm are. Misleading info, references and statements that are not verifiable, and predictions or guarantees of results are regulated. Check out the social media site guidelines for more information.
Keep track. When the phones do ring and the emails come in, make sure to note how people the person on the other end found out about the firm. This will help determine if you need to make a tweak to where your ads are placed. Change language or placement when they're not driving inbound calls or emails.
What's required—and taboo? Under Florida Bar rules, ads must include the name of at least one lawyer at the firm and one city, town or county. Practice areas are allowed. Electronic newsletters can be sent, as long as the recipients have opted into receiving them. And in a significant change from past rules, lawyers and firms no longer must include a disclaimer about hiring a lawyer being “an important decision.”
Rules and regulations. Completed ads must be reviewed and approved by The Florida Bar's Ethics and Advertising Department; if you run ads outside Florida, other state bars will need to review for compliance for their markets. This applies to all ads, including TV and radio, print, direct mail and email and internet advertising. The review process takes time; submit ads well ahead of placement deadlines to ensure sufficient time to make any changes they deem necessary.
With these rules in mind and your marketing plan in place, a savvy law firm will be ready to release its ad campaign and win over new clients and referral sources—without wasting a dime, or thousands of dollars.
Julie Talenfeld is the president of BoardroomPR, one of Florida's largest integrated marketing agencies. She can be reached at [email protected]
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllConversation Catalyst: Transforming Professional Advancement Through Strategic Dialogue
5 minute readSEC Whistleblower Program: What to Expect Under the Trump Administration
6 minute readTurning the Shock of a January Marital Split Into Effective Strategies for Your Well-Being
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250