Dezer Loses Eviction Fight at North Miami Beach Mall Eyed for Redevelopment
This is one of several eviction lawsuits filed by Dezer Development against tenants at its Intracoastal Mall.
July 08, 2019 at 03:18 PM
5 minute read
Dezer Development LLC has lost its push to evict a seafood restaurant from a North Miami Beach mall where the high-end condominium developer plans a new project.
The lawsuit against Sea Grill is one of several Dezer Development filed against some of the tenants at its Intracoastal Mall over allegedly unpaid rent and other expenses due under the leases.
Sea Grill attorney Gary Phillips argued Dezer's legal salvo is a way for the developer to clear out existing businesses to pursue its new project. Dezer's attorney denied any connection between rent issues and redevelopment.
Dezer Development has no issues with many mall tenants, general counsel David Reimer noted last year.
Regardless of the motivation for the lawsuits, the Sea Grill tenant gets to stay at its location and isn't on the hook for higher rent after the Third District Court of Appeal on Wednesday affirmed a trial court final judgment siding with the restaurant.
Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Jorge Cueto in December 2017 ruled in favor of Sea Grill, which Dezer Development sued in March 2016 for eviction and claiming breach of lease.
Sea Grill leased a 7,081-square-foot space at the Intracoastal Mall starting in January 2012 for a base rent of $19,481 a month plus taxes, utilities and operating expenses.
Sea Grill's contribution toward the operating expenses, or the restaurant's cost share for the building maintenance and repairs, is capped at a 3% increase annually, even if the operating cost is higher, according to court filings and a lease rider. The operating expenses often are referred to as common area maintenance, or CAM, charges.
Sea Grill's lease was signed with a previous mall owner, MSW Intracoastal Mall LLC, and transferred to subsequent owners CJUF III Intracoastal LLC and a Dezer Development affiliate.
Dezer Intracoastal Mall LLC bought the 26.2-acre property at 3881 NE 163rd St., north of the causeway connecting North Miami Beach and Sunny Isles Beach, in December 2013 for $63.5 million, according to Miami-Dade County property appraiser's records.
During the first year and a half of owning the mall, Dezer Development accepted the same rent paid to the previous owners, Cueto wrote in his final judgment.
In June 2015, Dezer demanded an additional $602,380, which included a retroactive $84,456 annual increase for operating expenses, late fees and interest. Dezer's calculation exceeded the 3% cap, and its ledgers were in agreement with Sea Grill's showing the restaurant paid all that was due under its lease, Cueto wrote. In fact, Cueto found a Sea Grill overpayment of $2,111.
“The law is not so powerless as to allow the landlord to run roughshod over the tenant's rights, ignore the clear and unambiguous terms of the lease and attempt to evict a tenant who overpaid its rent,” Cueto said.
Judge Eric Hendon wrote for the unanimous appellate panel, with Judges Kevin Emas and Thomas Logue concurring.
Dezer Development's attorneys, Rosenthal Law Group founder Alex Rosenthal and associate Amanda Jassem Jones in Weston, didn't return a request for comment by deadline.
Reimer, Dezer Development's in-house counsel, also didn't return a request for comment by deadline.
Dezer has won some of its other lawsuits against Intracoastal Mall tenants.
In September 2014, the company sued tenant Rudy's Barbershop and Spa LLC, saying it didn't pay monthly rent and assessments. The court ordered the tenant out.
Dezer Intracoastal sued to evict Prestige Beauty Academy International Inc. alleging it owed $126,370. The two sides settled, and the case was dismissed, court records show.
Dezer Development has submitted no redevelopment plans or applications to the city for the mall, according to community development director Justin Proffitt.
In 2015, it obtained a zoning change allowing redevelopment with up to 2,000 residential units, 2.5 million square feet of commercial space and buildings up to 40 stories tall on the east side of the site. Building heights would scale down to three stories on the west side.
Dezer submitted a traffic study in May showing an aerial site plan that marks areas for retail, restaurants, townhouses and other residences. The aerial view also shows a plan to carve out some of the land and allow water from the Intracoastal Waterway to flow into the property.
Dezer Development, based in Sunny Isles Beach, was founded by Michael Dezer and is run by his son, Gil Dezer. Its most recognized project out of its many luxury high-rises is the car elevator-equipped Porsche Design Tower.
Phillips, who represented Sea Grill, said he isn't surprised with the outcome of his client's case.
“We expected the appellate court to affirm the trial court because the trial court's ruling made sense based upon the clear and unambiguous language set forth in the lease,” Phillips said. “Our clients paid all CAM charges and increases they were supposed to pay, and we don't believe the landlord ever had any case to try and evict them.”
Phillips is founding shareholder and managing partner at Phillips, Cantor & Shalek in Hollywood. He worked on the case with shareholder and equity partner Jeffrey Shalek.
If Dezer Development is trying to push out tenants, Phillips said alternatives are available.
“He can always buy out a lease, he can promise to move them into a new retail spot that he is going to be developing on the property and then negotiate the tenant improvement allowance,” he said. “The parties can always agree to change the terms of a contract.”
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-85
- 3Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 4Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 5Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250