Bruce Rogow Takes Clients From Civil Rights Activists to Roger Stone
As a young attorney, Rogow represented civil rights activists in the deep South and helped set Supreme Court precedent for indigent defendants. Now he explains how he ended up representing Roger Stone.
July 08, 2019 at 05:30 AM
7 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Few in the legal community doubt Fort Lauderdale attorney Bruce Rogow's prowess and integrity. He cut his teeth as a civil rights lawyer in Mississippi in the 1960s, providing legal assistance to civil rights workers trying to end segregation in the deep South. He then dedicated himself to helping the poor, becoming assistant director of Greater Miami Legal Services Inc.
Since then, he's become a well-known First Amendment and constitutional lawyer, arguing 11 times before the U.S. Supreme Court — more than any other Florida attorney. He also has been counsel in scores of cases in the Florida Supreme Court and has argued more than 450 civil and criminal cases in federal and state appellate courts.
But Rogow is now in the limelight as the lawyer representing longtime Republican operative and staunch Donald Trump ally Roger Stone.
Stone, who was arrested in January at his Fort Lauderdale home as part of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, faced charges of witness tampering, obstructing an official proceeding and five counts of making false statements.
The path from civil rights attorney to defender of a Republican Party political operative is on its face an unconventional trajectory. But to the 79-year-old Rogow, there is little difference between those disparate clients.
“People are worthy of a defense, especially when their liberty is on the line,” he said.
Even as Stone faces a finding of contempt for allegedly breaking his gag order — imposed for an Instagram post featuring his trial judge next to apparent cross-hairs of a rifle scope — Rogow stands by him. He compares Stone's cultural radioactivity to another one of his high-profile controversial clients, Alan Dershowitz. The retired Harvard law professor was involved in a cadre of suits and countersuits stemming from claims related to former client Jeffery Epstein's sex trafficking investigation, including allegations linking Dershowitz to the underage sex scandal.
“Did Alan Dershowitz do anything that suggested to me that I should not represent him? The answer is absolutely not. The same thing with Roger Stone,” Rogow said. ”Each, in their very distinctive ways, is a mensch — a good person.”
Rogow, who was a law professor for 40 years at Nova Southeastern University and later dean, admits he has a sort of attraction to outsized characters. During his 55 years as an attorney, he has represented rap artist Luther “Uncle Luke” Campbell of 2 Live Crew; Seminole Tribe Chief James Billie, a former alligator wrestler who built the Seminole Tribe into a major business enterprise; Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke; and Trump.
He also handled several cases for the president's loose network of companies, including some that arose from club membership and vendor disputes. In 2017, for example, he handled an appeal for Trump in litigation against a Trump-supporting Florida painter who won $300,000 in reimbursement and damages after the Trump Organization failed to pay for a golf course renovation. Rogow lost the appeal.
Despite his defense of controversial clients, Rogow is near-universally revered in Florida.
“He is the most strategic, wisest, thoughtful and ethical lawyer I have ever met in my entire career,” said Bobby Gilbert of Kopelowitz Ostrow Ferguson Weiselberg Gilbert in Coral Gables. Gilbert has worked closely with Rogow for more than 20 years, most notably on a series of class actions against banks for predatory overdraft fees that settled for a combined $1.2 billion.
Ira Leesfield, a Miami personal injury attorney and staple of Florida Democratic politics, had a similar take. “I just have a world of respect for him. Bruce is one of a kind,” he said.
Rogow's legacy is that of a steadfast purist — someone who believes that who you represent is not who you are, that every person, no matter how unpopular or vile, deserves a vigorous defense. And this is when the American Civil Liberties Union is under attack for defending hate groups and Harvard professor Ron Sullivan has been criticized for representing former Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein,
Intolerance
In Rogow's modest Fort Lauderdale office — for years he's shared a desk with his associate — a framed New York Times story dated June 12, 1972 and headlined “High Court Bars Any Jail Sentence Without Counsel,” chronicles the decision in Rogow's first U.S. Supreme Court case, Argersinger v. Hamlin, which held that defendants, even those facing misdemeanor charges, have the right to counsel when the crime they are charged with carries a penalty of possible imprisonment. His office is festooned with similar displays.
Rogow said he'll never forget the first time he rode the elevator at the Supreme Court, flanked by the U.S. solicitor general, deputy solicitor general and his mother, who raised him by herself.
“My mother is standing behind me and she grabs my hand,” Rogow said. “And to this assembled crowd she says, 'Brucie's hand is wet just like it was before his bar mitzvah.' ”
A framed multi-colored Native American dress represents his work for the Seminole Tribe of Florida in a lawsuit against the state when the tribe opened gaming on Indian reservations.
“ My daughter used to wear the dress when she was little,” Rogow said as he stooped to gaze at the frame.
He has long endured criticism for representing certain clients — even from those close to him.
“My wife Jacquelyn didn't like it when I represented 2 Live Crew and what their songs represent: the misogyny, the language,” said Rogow, referring to his representation of the rap group in an obscenity case for its 1990 album “As Nasty As They Wanna Be” featuring track names such as “Me So Horny,” “The F*ck Shop” and “Dirty Nursery Rhymes.”
His wife, who was a member of the Audubon Society, also wasn't a fan of another client: Billie, who shot and killed an endangered Florida panther. Rogow said his wife, also an attorney, came around after she met Campbell and Billie.
But when he represented a group of Nazis arrested for violating a Miami Beach anti-swastika ordinance, one of the circuit judges told Rogow, who is Jewish, that he was a “disgrace to his race” and that the Nazis “should be lined up against the wall and shot.”
“I said, judge, that's what they want to do to us,” Rogow said.
Even now representing Stone, Rogow gets emails from his friends asking how he could represent the former Nixon aide.
Rogow, who evokes images of Abe Lincoln with his signature bow tie and chinstrap beard, is a staunch adherent to the First Amendment, which is how he came to represent Nazis and rappers. And from the perspective, he said there's little difference between Stone and Trump, or for that matter, David Duke and Uncle Luke.
“All of these [reactions] underscore intolerance, which is the greatest threat we have to a civil society,” he said. “Tolerance of others' ideas, tolerance of others' work; tolerance of others' beliefs is critical.”
Rogow insists he will continue to represent clients as long as they keep coming, and he hopes his practice, one that often had him representing the homeless and wealthy simultaneously, will be instructive to future generations as they wrestle with issues of free speech and discourse.
“Perhaps my past and present representation of unpopular people and causes can remind people that suppressing speech is more dangerous than listening to it.”
Related Reading:
Litigator Roy Black Issues 'Call to Arms' at UM Law Commencement
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How Some Elite Law Firms Are Growing Equity Partner Ranks Faster Than Others
- 2Fried Frank Partner Leaves for Paul Hastings to Start Tech Transactions Practice
- 3Stradley Ronon Welcomes Insurance Team From Mintz
- 4Weil Adds Acting Director of SEC Enforcement, Continuing Government Hiring Streak
- 5Monday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250