South Florida Lawyers Secure $5 Million Settlement Over Car Dealer's Spam Texts
A team of South Florida attorneys steered a class action lawsuit against West Palm Beach car dealership Schumacher Automotive Inc. toward a $5 million settlement.
July 08, 2019 at 11:28 AM
5 minute read
A team of South Florida attorneys negotiated a $5 million settlement with West Palm Beach car dealership Schumacher Automotive Inc., accused of sending more than 58,000 marketing text messages that violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
“That's 58,000 people who've looked at their phone and were like, 'Why the heck is this company texting me?'” said Andrew Shamis of Shamis & Gentile in Miami, who represents plaintiff Jerry Eisenband.
Eisenband filed his complaint July 11, 2018, spending less than a year in litigation.
Shamis worked with Scott Edelsberg of Edelsberg Law in Aventura and Manuel Hiraldo of Manuel Hiraldo P.A. in Fort Lauderdale to sue on behalf of everyone allegedly included in the marketing blasts.
Congress passed the TCPA in 1991 to restrict unwanted telemarketing, making it a violation for businesses to call or text consumers without their consent. Texting has become the go-to medium for businesses looking for new customers, according to Shamis, who's made it his mission to clamp down on unsolicited messages.
“Back then you couldn't make 100,000 calls at once,” Shamis said. “Now, you can press a button and send it to 100,000 peoples' personal cell phones.”
Plaintiff counsel Hiraldo deposed the dealership's corporate representatives to flesh out its marketing techniques and decipher how many text messages were sent, while Shamis and Edelsberg managed the case and its briefs.
|
Click here to read the complaint
Schumacher Automotive denied liability. After an internal investigation, defense attorney Craig H. Blinderman of Kurkin Forehand Brandes in Aventura claimed to have found the source of the problem.
According to Blinderman, a “rogue employee” got hold of the company's customer list and used them in CallFire, a third-party mass text messaging platform. The texts featured deals for buying and leasing cars, and though they appeared to be from the director of the dealership's business development center, Blinderman said management had no idea.
“This rogue put this information out there, the text messages appeared to have gone out after a thorough investigation and we had to defend the case accordingly,” Blinderman said.
That revelation meant defenses were limited, the way Blinderman saw it, and the amount damages and attorney fees against his client would be “astronomically larger” than any settlement.
“It was a business decision by my client to settle this case, which he frankly had to pinch his nose in order to do,” Blinderman said. “But the reality was, given the legal analysis, this was the best way to mitigate his damages.”
The employee was fired, Blinderman said.
U.S. District Judge Beth Bloom in the Southern District of Florida signed off on the settlement, giving $180 to every class member — a significant amount, Shamis said, considering $500 is the maximum they could have secured in court.
Attorney fees make up 25%, or $1.25 million, of the $5 million award.
In Shamis' view, the defendant's appreciation for TCPA made the case a success story.
“It was apparent throughout litigation they took the TCPA very seriously,” Shamis said. “They understood how important the TCPA is and, as far as defendants go, they understood what was going on and they were trying to abide by the law in every way possible.”
Related story: Planet Fitness Faces Multimillion-Dollar Suit Over Text Ad Offering Free Bottle of Water
No matter what a company is selling, Shamis said he worries that every time the TCPA is breached without penalty it chips away at the privacy of individuals.
“If you don't stop telemarketing text messages like this, the amount of text messages you would get would explode,” Shamis said.
It's been a pet peeve for as long as Shamis can remember.
“Back in 1992, they're not sending text messages but you're sitting at the dinner table and you'd get 100 phone calls, and your mom and dad would have to get up from the table and say they're not interested,” he said.
Shamis said his client is ecstatic, and not just about the money.
“A lot of people don't like spam texts and they don't like spam calls,” Shamis said. “So when you get a good result, it kind of feels like a win for the good guys.”
|Read the settlement agreement:
|Case: Jerry Eisenband v. Schumacher Automotive
Case No.: 9:18-cv-80911-BB
Description: TCPA class action
Filing date: July 11, 2018
Settlement date: July 1, 2019
Judge: U.S. District Judge Beth Bloom in the Southern District of Florida
Plaintiffs attorneys: Andrew Shamis, Shamis & Gentile, Miami; Scott Edelsberg, Edelsberg Law, Aventura; Manuel Hiraldo, Manuel Hiraldo, Fort Lauderdale
Defense attorney: Craig H. Blinderman, Kurkin Forehand Brandes, Aventura
Settlement amount: $5 million
More settlements and verdicts:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllArt of the Settlement: Trump Attorney Reveals Strategy in ABC Lawsuit
Nurse Awarded $2.3M in Orlando Crash Case After Declining $50K Settlement Offer
Trump, ABC News Settle Defamation Lawsuit Before Depositions
Trending Stories
- 1Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 2Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 3'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 4Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
- 5As a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250