US Attorney Says New York Feds Not Bound by Epstein's Deal With Florida Feds
Manhattan's top federal prosecutor says a secret nonprosecution agreement reached by Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida doesn't extend beyond its boundaries.
July 08, 2019 at 06:29 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
New York federal prosecutors say they aren't bound by a deal signed by Miami federal prosecutors who agreed not to pursue sexual abuse charges against wealthy financier Jeffrey Epstein.
A two-count indictment was unsealed Monday charging Epstein with exploiting dozens of underage girls at his opulent homes in New York and Palm Beach. A forfeiture request covers his Manhattan mansion.
U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman of the Southern District of New York said the decade-old nonprosecution agreement between Epstein and Southern District of Florida prosecutors didn't affect his office's ability to indict the former Palm Beach billionaire.
“That agreement only binds, by its terms … the Southern District of Florida. The Southern District of New York is not bound by that agreement and is not a signatory to that agreement,” Berman said at a news conference announcing the new charges.
In a the 13-page indictment, New York prosecutors charged Epstein paid girls as young as 14 from 2002 to 2005 to perform nude or seminude massages, which became “increasingly sexual” in nature, with Epstein typically masturbating and molesting his victims.
Epstein paid some victims “hundreds of dollars” to recruit other young girls to the network, allowing him to create “an ever-expanding web of new victims.” Epstein pleaded not guilty to sex trafficking conspiracy and trafficking, Berman said.
Epstein, 66, is known for his connections to powerful figures across the political spectrum ranging from President Donald Trump to former President Bill Clinton as well as Prince Andrew.
In 2007, Epstein signed a secret agreement with federal prosecutors in Miami shielding him and his alleged accomplices from federal prosecution in a case alleging they ran a child sex ring out of Epstein's Palm Beach mansion from 1999 to 2007.
In exchange for the deal, Epstein pleaded guilty to two state prostitution charges and served 13 months in a Palm Beach County work-release program allowing him to leave for work. Epstein faced a possible life sentence and was required to register as a sex offender. His alleged co-conspirators were never charged, and the new indictment makes no mention of others involved.
Earlier this year, U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra in West Palm Beach ruled prosecutors led by then-Miami U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta — now U.S. labor secretary — broke federal law by keeping the agreement secret from Epstein's alleged victims. In a tweet late Monday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Acosta must step down based on “the unconscionable agreement” with Epstein.
The Justice Department opened an investigation into prosecutor's handling of the plea deal after a series of articles by the Miami Herald drew renewed attention to the case.
Charles Ross, a partner with Mintz & Gold in New York, said Epstein's defense team would likely point to the nonprosecution agreement to argue Berman was barred from bringing the New York case.
That position, he said, could hinge on the underlying agreement and covers certain acts or types of crimes, and attorneys from both sides would be sure to pour over the language with a “fine-tooth comb.”
“The play that Epstein's defense lawyers would have is the breadth that the those nonprosecution agreements confer,” said Ross, who practiced in New York and Florida before joining Mintz & Gold.
“Typically, nonprosecution agreements are limited to the jurisdiction which grants them and writes them, and that's certainly the position of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York,” he said.
Prosecutors in New York alleged a conspiracy that included undisclosed Epstein employees setting up “appointments” with underage girls on his behalf. One person in New York, identified in the indictment as Employee-2, called victims before Epstein traveled to Florida to make sure the encounters were set up when he arrived, the filing said.
Ross said the conspiracy count allowed the Southern District to reach acts outside of Manhattan, and contacts between alleged co-conspirators in New York and victims in Florida would help prosecutors make their case for jurisdiction.
“Certainly, the Southern District of New York can reach acts outside of the Southern District of New York. What they need is acts that take place within the the Southern District,” he said.
Epstein was taken into custody Saturday at Teterboro Airport in New Jersey after arriving on his private jet from Paris. His arrest followed an investigation by the FBI, the public-corruption unit of the U.S. Attorney's Office and the New York City Police Department.
Berman declined to comment about the involvement of the public-corruption unit and said he would not discuss “speculation” regarding high-profile people associated with Epstein.
Epstein is held at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan pending a bail hearing scheduled for Thursday.
The case has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Richard M. Berman.
Read More:
Epstein Indicted for Sex Crimes in Manhattan, South Fla
US: Once-Secret Jeffrey Epstein Sex Offender Deal Must Stand
2nd Circuit Orders Jeffrey Epstein Records Unsealed, Cautions Media and Public
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readUS Judge OKs Partial Release of Ex-Special Counsel's Final Report in Election Case
3 minute readSpecial Counsel Jack Smith Prepares Final Report as Trump Opposes Its Release
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250