Association Construction Contracts Require Deft Negotiation by Legal Counsel
Major renovation projects are par for the course for condominium associations of South Florida buildings completed more than 25 years ago. For these properties to remain competitive in a market with a plethora of newer options, they must renovate and restore their common areas and amenities to ensure they remain in top form.
July 11, 2019 at 10:43 AM
6 minute read
Major renovation projects are par for the course for condominium associations of South Florida buildings completed more than 25 years ago. For these properties to remain competitive in a market with a plethora of newer options, they must renovate and restore their common areas and amenities to ensure they remain in top form.
Construction contracts often represent some of the costliest expenses that condominium associations will ever approve, yet many associations fail to utilize the necessary legal resources and expertise to craft and execute the most effective terms and agreements. Instead, they focus merely on obtaining competitive bids, as most associations are required to do for projects exceeding 5% of their total annual budget (10% for HOAs), and often neglect to consult with highly qualified and experienced legal counsel to negotiate and finalize every aspect of their agreement with a general contractor.
Without a lawyer involved, a poorly negotiated and written construction contract can have serious consequences. Having a qualified and experienced attorney draft or review an association's contract can help avoid risks and expensive disputes. Dealing with the aftereffects of a poorly negotiated or poorly written contract can be far more expensive than paying a lawyer to do it correctly in the first place. An experienced attorney can draft and negotiate a contract that will protect an association's interests and be legally sound.
Attorneys write contracts in ways that favor their clients. Attorneys with experience in the construction industry will know the customary contract terms, and they will draft a contract in their client's favor. If the contractor is drafting the contract, its lawyer will be doing exactly that.
Associations need lawyers who can review the contract and advise boards of directors on reasonable terms, as well as negotiating strategies, which could help save them significant sums of money.
Experienced attorneys will know the terms that are needed to protect an association's rights. Attorneys will verify the correct name of the legal entity of the selected contractor and confirm that it is properly licensed to perform the work. They can also search for any complaints that have been filed against the contractor.
It is critical for association attorneys to stipulate that the contractor must maintain proper insurance coverage and limits, including worker's compensation and commercial general liability insurance. The association will need to be named in the original certificates of insurance reflecting that it is an additional insured and not merely a certificate holder. Association attorneys and insurance professionals can verify that the proper insurance provisions are included in the contract and the contractor has the proper coverage. Furthermore, associations should review with their attorneys the possibility of obtaining payment and performance bonds.
The payment schedule provided in the contract should be commensurate with the percentage of the work that is completed, and it should include a retainage of 10% that is held back for each payment. The contractor should provide releases of liens and progress payment affidavits for all partial payments as well as releases from all the subcontractors and suppliers.
Qualified attorneys will verify that indemnity clauses are included in the contract to protect the association and property manager from liability, and they will also ensure that it specifies a beginning date and completion date. These dates should account for possible delays, so it is generally recommended to establish a daily penalty for late completion.
The terms of labor and material warranties should always be clear in any contract, and they should include the warranty's timespan and covered items. Warranty provisions can help an association determine and assign liability should a material be defective or require repair. Roofing contractor warranties, for example, should specify the period during which a leak would be covered as well as the covered causes for leaks.
Association attorneys should require that the contractor produce the necessary building department permits for the project and provide all the materials, supervision, labor, tools and equipment needed to complete the work in strict accordance with the contract documents and as required by all applicable laws, ordinances, and the rules and regulations of any governing authority. The contractor must also represent that it has enough qualified personnel to assure timely performance as well as the proper tools and equipment to perform the work, and that it is financially capable of performing the agreement. The contractor must have visited the site of the work and examined the actual job conditions, and it must be familiar with local conditions and every matter that will have a bearing on the performance of the work. It must also ensure that all materials incorporated in the work will be new (unless otherwise specified), and that any of its work that does not meet these standards may be considered defective.
The termination terms should include a clause permitting the association to terminate without cause as well as for a material breach of contract, which can be difficult to prove.
Prior to the issuance of the final payment, the terms should call for the association's engineer or design professional to conduct inspections to verify that everything has been completed and all the building permits have been closed.
Finally, it is also recommended for associations to include language that permits them to recover attorney's fees and costs, including those for expert witnesses, if they prevail in any ensuing litigation.
With the proper due diligence by qualified legal counsel and professionals, associations can avoid mistakes and omissions in their contracts for construction and remodeling projects that could potentially lead to disastrous financial repercussions. Contracts negotiated and prepared by experienced attorneys reduce the chances that associations will end up in litigation. Plus, if a court battle proves unavoidable, a good contract can dramatically limit its length and complexity while also greatly enhancing an association's chances for success.
Jeffrey S. Respler is a shareholder with the South Florida law firm Siegfried Rivera. He focuses on community association and construction law, and he is a contributor to the firm's condo and HOA law blog, www.FloridaHOALawyerBlog.com. He is admitted to practice in Florida, New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania. For more information, visit www.siegfriedrivera.com, or call 305-442-3334.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
4 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250