Court Swats Steinger Iscoe Attorney's 'Trial by Ambush' Tactic in Personal Injury Lawsuit
"These 'trial by ambush' tactics were wrong in 1993, and they remain wrong today," the Fourth District Court of Appeal ruled Wednesday, awarding a retrial to a defendant who'd been prejudiced by an expert witness who hadn't reviewed all the evidence.
July 11, 2019 at 03:55 PM
4 minute read
The Fourth District Court of Appeal Wednesday cautioned against using “trial by ambush” ploys, in its opinion on a personal injury case in which the plaintiff's expert witness was shown evidence for the first time during trial.
Though there were no surprise witnesses or pieces of evidence mid-trial, the appellate court found it wasn't fair for plaintiffs counsel to tell jurors what the expert's opinion was on a piece of evidence before the expert had actually reviewed it.
The plaintiffs had relied on the expert as the only witness to have compared two MRI scans, but in fact he'd only seen one of them when trial started, according to the opinion, which suggests Fort Lauderdale plaintiffs attorney Todd L. Baker of Steinger Iscoe & Greene tried to ”bolster his case” with undisclosed testimony, by waiting until the last minute to get it.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 3'That's Disappointing': Only 11% of MDL Appointments Went to Attorneys of Color in 2023
- 4What We Know About the Kentucky Judge Killed in His Chambers
- 5'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250