Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton Files First Helms-Burton Suit Against a Bank, Seeking $792M
"It's exciting and also risky, because it is truly a novel area of the law. There has never been any case law decided on this, so we're literally making law as we go," said Javier A. Lopez of Kozyak Tropin & Trhockmorton, representing the family of Banco Nunez founders, who seek damages after the Cuban government confiscated their business in the 1960s.
July 15, 2019 at 01:57 PM
4 minute read
Javier A. Lopez and Evan Stroman of Kozyak Tropin and Throckmorton in Coral Gables have brought a $792 million federal lawsuit against a French investment bank, accusing it of profiting from a Cuban bank that Fidel Castro's government expropriated from the plaintiffs in the 1960s.
The lawsuit falls under the Helms-Burton Act, enacted in 1996 by President Bill Clinton to allow U.S. citizens to sue over alleged trafficking of confiscated property after the Cuban revolution in 1959. But the statute never went into effect, as Clinton's successors continually suspended it—until May 2, when President Donald Trump lifted the ban.
A handful of complaints have been filed so far, but this in the first Helms-Burton lawsuit against a financial institution, French investment bank Societe Generale S.A., doing business as Societe General Americas. The bank has main offices in Paris and New York, according to the lawsuit.
The European Union has said it will use its Blocking Statute to push back against the enforcement of U.S. Helms-Burton Act judgments affecting EU companies.
Things could get interesting, according to Lopez.
“It's exciting and also risky, because it is truly a novel area of the law,” Lopez said. “There has never been any case law decided on this, so we're literally making law as we go.”
Related story: Miami Law Firm Targets Trivago in Helms-Burton Lawsuit
The plaintiffs' grandparents founded Banco Nunez, which became the second largest Cuban bank in 1958, according to the complaint in the Southern District of Florida. It had 22 branches across the country, equity of $7.8 million and controlled $105.1 million in assets, according to the suit.
The Helms-Burton Act allows plaintiffs to seek treble damages and to add 6% interest per annum on the original $7.8 million, for a total $792 million.
When Castro's Communist regime nationalized Cuba's industry and businesses, Banco Nunez became part of the government's central bank, Banco Nacional de Cuba, where it remains today.
Defendant Societe General provided various credit facilities to the Banco Nacional de Cuba between 2000 and 2010, profiting from fees on wire transfers and interest on loans, according to the complaint.
Defense counsel Alex C. Lakatos of Mayer Brown in Washington, D.C., did not respond to a request for comment by deadline. But Societe Generale's head of media relations Antoine Lheritier said in an emailed statement, ”SG believes this litigation is without merit and intends to defend itself vigorously.”
In 2018, Societe Generale was prosecuted in the Southern District of New York under the Trading With the Enemy Act, for violating an economic embargo on Cuba. The bank accepted responsibility and agreed to pay a $1.3 billion penalty.
Lopez and Stroman say there's no way to tell how long the window for filing Helms-Burton lawsuits could stay open, as the Trump administration could technically suspend the statute again at any moment. But once a lawsuit has been filed, it will stand even if the statute doesn't.
The way Stroman sees it, this case is unique in that it aims to reduce the Cuban government's ability to work with financial institutions, with the goal of encouraging a transition from dictatorship to democratic society.
“It has a wide-ranging effect that should hopefully eventually bring about democratic elections in Cuba,” Stroman said.
Lopez and Stroman have sent out 30-day notice letters to three other banks, alleging similar claims. Lopez said he hopes this is the catalyst to hard-hitting legal action down the line.
“The day to sue the Cuban government directly has not come yet,” he said. “I'm confident that one day that is going to have to be dealt with head on, but that's not today.”
Read the complaint:
|Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGreenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
Delray Beach Financial Adviser Indicted in Alleged Illegal Tax Shelter Scheme
McGlinchey Opens Third Florida Office in Tampa, Hopes to Tap Region's Talent
2 minute readBuy-Now-Pay-Later Company Affirm Hit With Data Breach Class Action After Cyberattack on Banking Partner
Trending Stories
- 1Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome', DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
- 2Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 3When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250