Video Shows Broward Judge Grabbing Court Employee by Neck
The Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission calls for the indefinite suspension for Broward Circuit Judge Vegina 'Gina' T. Hawkins.
July 18, 2019 at 04:50 PM
4 minute read
A Broward circuit judge is facing possible suspension after being caught on security footage wrapping her hands around a court employee's neck.
An investigative panel of the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission recommended a suspension for Broward Circuit Judge Vegina “Gina” Hawkins to the Florida Supreme Court on Thursday. A notice of charges said Hawkins was taped physically assaulting an employee June 11 after learning the afternoon docket was not ready when she expected it in the morning.
“After being informed that the papers would be provided to her shortly, Judge Hawkins sought out the employee who was working in another judge's courtroom,” the filing said. “Entering the courtroom through a secure hallway, Judge Hawkins motioned for the employee to come outside into the hallway. As the employee walks through the doorway, Judge Hawkins placed her hands around his neck and shook him back and forth.”
The video shows Hawkins have a “brief but intense” conversation with the employee after the encounter, the JQC said.
In addition to characterizing Hawkins' conduct as “exceptionally inappropriate,” the JQC panel raised concerns with the judge's portrayal of the incident.
A statement provided by the judge to investigators said she was acting in “jest.” She also asserted she never touched the employee and portrayed their relationship as “fairly friendly.” The recommendation said Hawkin's characterization was refuted by the surveillance footage and statements by others who work in the courtroom.
Read the suspension recommendation:
“The employee involved did not describe the judge's demeanor that morning as friendly or joking, but described her as 'extremely upset,' ” the filing said. “ Another employee who interacted with Judge Hawkins shortly after the incident says Judge Hawkins remarked about the encounter and demonstrated what she did by making a choking motion in the air. This employee described Judge Hawkins' overall behavior as 'unnecessarily unprofessional and unpredictable.' ”
Hawkins' attorney, Fort Lauderdale litigator David Bogenschutz, filed a response and objection to the JQC panel's recommendation with the high court. Her filing said the judge was unsure if the video shown to her by the panel was the same one she reviewed with Broward Circuit Chief Judge Jack Tuter in his office. Hawkins was unsure if she physically touched the employee but eventually conceded she had and said “whether she touched him or not, her actions were inappropriate,” Bogenschutz wrote.
Bogenschutz declined to provide additional comments.
The JQC proposed suspending Hawkins indefinitely without pay until the investigation is complete. JQC investigations normally take months.
The JQC panel “does not find Judge Hawkins' testimony that she was 'calm' and 'not at all angry,' credible, and having reviewed the statements and video evidence, the panel does not believe that her actions were in 'jest,' ” the recommendation said. The JQC was concerned that “ Hawkins' inability to understand that even in jest, her conduct was wholly inappropriate.”
“Within the judicial branch, as in civilian life, it is never appropriate for a person in a supervisory position to put their hands around the neck of an employee or subordinate and shake them,” the filing added. “It is all the more inappropriate, and potentially criminal, when such conduct is motivated by anger, or to emphasize displeasure.”
Tuter's office did not return for comment by deadline, but the call was made after the main Broward County Courthouse was closed due to a major water main break.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Trending Stories
- 1Commission Confirms Three of Newsom's Appellate Court Picks
- 2Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 3GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 4'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 5Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250