Miami's Watson Island Flagstone Project Wins on Appeal
A challenge by residents and a competing developer are turned aside on plans for an eye-catching project on the causeway linking Miami and Miami Beach.
July 19, 2019 at 10:33 AM
4 minute read
The city and the developer of Miami's large-scale Watson Island project won on appeal against a would-be competitor and three people who tried to invalidate the municipal lease for waterfront property where hotels and retail are set to rise.
The victory comes on the heels of a settlement between the city and developer Flagstone Island Gardens LLC over a plan that started 18 years ago.
The Third District Court of Appeal on Wednesday upheld a lower court order finding no standing for the residents and losing bidder. Their attorneys had no comment by deadline
The foursome were represented by Carlton Fields shareholder Richard Ovelmen, senior counsel Justin Wales and associate Dorothy Kafka as well as by Dubbin & Kravetz principal Samuel Dubbin.
The attorneys and their clients are discussing their next steps, which could be asking for a rehearing en banc or for review by the Florida Supreme Court, Dubbin said.
On the other side were the city attorney's office and Eugene Stearns, Maria Fehretdinov, Jason Koslowe and David Coulter of Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson in Miami.
The island with a stunning view of the downtown skyline and cruise ships docked at the Port of Miami is envisioned for a 305-room hotel with 105 timeshares; a 300-room hotel; 221,000 square feet of retail; and a 1,500-space parking garage that will be up to three stories high.
A 50-slip megayacht marina and restaurant are already open on the MacArthur Causeway island linking Miami and Miami Beach.
Flagstone Island Gardens, led by Mehmet Bayraktar, won a 2001 solicitation for development of 11 acres of land and 13.4 acres of submerged land in Biscayne Bay. City voters approved the project later that year.
The project stalled for years because of the Great Recession and financing issues, prompting the city to modify the submerged land lease in 2014 and the land lease in 2016.
Miami residents Francine Liebman, Jorge Mursuli and Daniel Suarez sued in 2017, and bidder Willy Bermello joined as a plaintiff in 2018.
Bermello was principal and president of BAP Development Inc., which was an equity participant in losing bidder Watson Island Partners LLC.
The foursome argued in Miami-Dade Circuit Court that the amended leases violated the city charter and sought declaratory and injunctive relief against the city. Flagstone backed the city in court.
Circuit Judge William Thomas in a March 2018 order sided with the city and Flagstone, which argued the residents and Bermello lacked standing.
Thomas shot down an argument by Liebman, Mursuli and Suarez that a 2016 city code change granted them standing. He also rejected Bermello's special injury argument that he would consider applying for the project if the city again solicited developers.
The appellate panel unanimously agreed with Thomas that the code amendment doesn't apply and Bermello's special injury claim failed because he only argued he would “consider” re-applying rather than committing to participate in another round.
“Such an allegation fails to provide anything more than a mere possibility, and is insufficient to meet the special injury requirement for standing purposes,” Chief District Judge Kevin Emas wrote for a unanimous panel. Judges Norma Lindsey and Bronwyn Miller concurred.
The panel also agreed with Thomas that the city code amendment didn't apply because it was approved after the city OK'd the lease modifications.
“The amendment contains no language of retroactivity, nor any indication that it was intended to be applied retroactively,” Emas wrote.
The city and Flagstone weren't always on the same team. Flagstone sued the city for suspending the development,and Thomas last year ruled in favor of Flagstone.
The two sides agreed to a $20 million settlement in May. If the case went to trial, Flagstone could have claimed nearly $200 million in damages.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250