Appellate Court Sides With Dissolved Miami-Dade Toll Agency in Fight With Trailer Company
The Third District Court of Appeal upheld the motion for summary judgment granted to Miami-Dade County Expressway Authority against trailer rental company Tropical Trailer Leasing on Wednesday. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed a bill dissolving the toll board on July 3.
July 24, 2019 at 03:18 PM
4 minute read
Florida's Third District Court of Appeal has handed a legal win to a government agency that no longer exists.
The appellate court Wednesday upheld the motion for summary judgment granted to the Miami-Dade County Expressway Authority, or MDX, in the toll board's litigation with Tropical Trailer Leasing LLC .
On July 3, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed a bill dissolving the toll board and outlining the creation of a new agency, the Greater Miami Expressway Agency, to take its place.
Johnson, Anselmo, Murdoch, Burke, Piper & Hochman partner Christopher Stearns represented MDX in the appeals court. Stearns declined to comment on the opinion or provide speculation on the impact the organization's termination might have on the ruling.
Stearns Weaver shareholder Eugene Stearns is representing MDX in Leon Circuit Court in a lawsuit against Florida officials over the toll agency's dissolution. He did not respond to requests for comment by press time.
In 2014 Tropical Trailer, a Miami-based company specializing in trailer sales and rentals, filed a class action suit against MDX in Miami-Dade Circuit Court. The legal action sought to stop the toll agency from charging the company whenever its trailers were used on toll roads. Tropical Trailer appealed to the Third DCA after Miami-Dade Circuit Judge John Thornton granted MDX's motion for summary judgment against the company and denied the plaintiff's own motions for summary judgment and injunctive relief.
Read the appellate opinion:
Wednesday's appellate order addressed Tropical Trailer's appeals in a consolidated opinion. The Third DCA affirmed the lower court order and wrote their decision was based on the company's failure “to provide evidence of a clear legal right to the relief sought” or establish irreparable harm.
“MDX is exercising its proper statutory authority to charge trailer owners tolls for using MDX's roadways,” the opinion said, adding trailers meet the definition of “motor vehicle” under Florida law. “Tropical claims that it does not voluntarily use MDX's toll roads, and therefore, only the driver or contractor who owns the tractor should pay the toll. Yet, Tropical is unable to cite to any authority for this interpretation. It can only argue that historically it has not been charged tolls but does not challenge the constitutionality or the legality of the new definition of 'motor vehicle.'”
The appellate court said the issue Tropical is looking to address — namely Florida law classifying trailers as motor vehicles subject to tolls — fell outside of their purview. It held, “Tropical's complaint is with the legislature and does not belong in the courts.”
The opinion also said the company's grievances could be addressed by adjusting their arrangements with customers.
“Tropical has an adequate remedy outside the courts available through contract between its contractors and/or the drivers,” the opinion said. “Rental car companies enter into contracts everyday with renters that include a provision in which the company will either charge the renter directly for any tolls charged to the company or allow the renter to opt in to a pre-payment option.”
The opinion added, “In light of this type of provision in rental car agreements, there is no plausible reason why Tropical, or any other rental trailer company, cannot find an adequate remedy through a contractual agreement between it and its contractors who rent its trailers.”
Tallahassee-based Akerman partner Diane DeWolf served as Tropical Trailer's legal counsel in the Third DCA. DeWolf directed the Daily Business Review's request for comment to the firm's media relations manager, Marlisa Serrano, who did not respond by press time.
Related stories:
Bill Promises to Meet Infrastructure Needs of State, Local Governments
Miami Lawyers Tussle Over $53M Judgment in Toll Software Dispute
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readAs Unpredictability Rises, Gov't Law Practices Expect Trump Bump. Especially in Florida
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1January Petitions Press High Court on Guns, Birth Certificate Sex Classifications
- 2'A Waste of Your Time': Practice Tips From Judges in the Oakland Federal Courthouse
- 3Judge Extends Tom Girardi's Time in Prison Medical Facility to Feb. 20
- 4Supreme Court Denies Trump's Request to Pause Pending Environmental Cases
- 5‘Blitzkrieg of Lawlessness’: Environmental Lawyers Decry EPA Spending Freeze
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250