Appellate Court Sides With Dissolved Miami-Dade Toll Agency in Fight With Trailer Company
The Third District Court of Appeal upheld the motion for summary judgment granted to Miami-Dade County Expressway Authority against trailer rental company Tropical Trailer Leasing on Wednesday. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed a bill dissolving the toll board on July 3.
July 24, 2019 at 03:18 PM
4 minute read
Florida's Third District Court of Appeal has handed a legal win to a government agency that no longer exists.
The appellate court Wednesday upheld the motion for summary judgment granted to the Miami-Dade County Expressway Authority, or MDX, in the toll board's litigation with Tropical Trailer Leasing LLC .
On July 3, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed a bill dissolving the toll board and outlining the creation of a new agency, the Greater Miami Expressway Agency, to take its place.
Johnson, Anselmo, Murdoch, Burke, Piper & Hochman partner Christopher Stearns represented MDX in the appeals court. Stearns declined to comment on the opinion or provide speculation on the impact the organization's termination might have on the ruling.
Stearns Weaver shareholder Eugene Stearns is representing MDX in Leon Circuit Court in a lawsuit against Florida officials over the toll agency's dissolution. He did not respond to requests for comment by press time.
In 2014 Tropical Trailer, a Miami-based company specializing in trailer sales and rentals, filed a class action suit against MDX in Miami-Dade Circuit Court. The legal action sought to stop the toll agency from charging the company whenever its trailers were used on toll roads. Tropical Trailer appealed to the Third DCA after Miami-Dade Circuit Judge John Thornton granted MDX's motion for summary judgment against the company and denied the plaintiff's own motions for summary judgment and injunctive relief.
Read the appellate opinion:
Wednesday's appellate order addressed Tropical Trailer's appeals in a consolidated opinion. The Third DCA affirmed the lower court order and wrote their decision was based on the company's failure “to provide evidence of a clear legal right to the relief sought” or establish irreparable harm.
“MDX is exercising its proper statutory authority to charge trailer owners tolls for using MDX's roadways,” the opinion said, adding trailers meet the definition of “motor vehicle” under Florida law. “Tropical claims that it does not voluntarily use MDX's toll roads, and therefore, only the driver or contractor who owns the tractor should pay the toll. Yet, Tropical is unable to cite to any authority for this interpretation. It can only argue that historically it has not been charged tolls but does not challenge the constitutionality or the legality of the new definition of 'motor vehicle.'”
The appellate court said the issue Tropical is looking to address — namely Florida law classifying trailers as motor vehicles subject to tolls — fell outside of their purview. It held, “Tropical's complaint is with the legislature and does not belong in the courts.”
The opinion also said the company's grievances could be addressed by adjusting their arrangements with customers.
“Tropical has an adequate remedy outside the courts available through contract between its contractors and/or the drivers,” the opinion said. “Rental car companies enter into contracts everyday with renters that include a provision in which the company will either charge the renter directly for any tolls charged to the company or allow the renter to opt in to a pre-payment option.”
The opinion added, “In light of this type of provision in rental car agreements, there is no plausible reason why Tropical, or any other rental trailer company, cannot find an adequate remedy through a contractual agreement between it and its contractors who rent its trailers.”
Tallahassee-based Akerman partner Diane DeWolf served as Tropical Trailer's legal counsel in the Third DCA. DeWolf directed the Daily Business Review's request for comment to the firm's media relations manager, Marlisa Serrano, who did not respond by press time.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCOVID-19 Death Suit Against Nursing Home Sent to State Court, 11th Circuit Affirms
Year-End Tax Planning: How Real Estate Investors Can Leverage Qualified Opportunity Funds
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250