Florida's New Remote Notarization Law to Benefit Foreign Investors
On June 7, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed a bill into law permitting remote online notarization adding Florida to the growing list of states that permit notaries to perform notarizations online for clients anywhere in the world.
July 25, 2019 at 09:36 AM
5 minute read
On June 7, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed a bill into law permitting remote online notarization adding Florida to the growing list of states that permit notaries to perform notarizations online for clients anywhere in the world. The law, which takes effect on Jan. 1, 2020, will benefit Floridians in many ways, but has the potential to significantly encourage foreign direct investment in Florida. When the law takes effect, foreign visitors to Florida who negotiate business contracts, form companies, or purchase real estate will be able to close on their deal from the comfort of home, without a second visit to Florida. For investors living in Asia and other distant parts of the world, knowing that they will be able to conclude their investment online removes psychological barriers to investing in Florida.
Operationally, remote online notarization essentially updates notarization procedures to permit the use of readily available online technology and communications, specifically video conferencing, for the verification and execution of the documentation witnessed by Florida notaries. Those signing documents requiring notarization (or any witnesses to the signing) will no longer be required to be physically present before the notary, or even in Florida, for that matter. Notaries will remain responsible to confirm the identify of the signer, if necessary via third party confirmation, and additional requirements were crafted to ensure the integrity of the new process. Florida notaries wishing to perform remote online notarizations will pay a $25 fee, submit a signed and sworn registration to the Executive Office of the Governor, meet certain new bond requirements, complete a required course, and establish an account with an approved remote online notarization software service provider. Additionally, the law requires online Florida notaries to store a secure electronic journal (including audio-video) for each transaction for a period of 10 years.
The practical impact of the new law, which at first glance would appear to be simply a bureaucratic concession to the availability of technology, is potentially vast. Florida's real estate industry understands the implications of Remote Online Notarization and has eagerly followed the legislative process, but the mainstream media has paid little attention. But the process stands to facilitate direct foreign investment in real estate and business investments, given the logistical complexities such closings present when parties cannot physically be at the table. The use of powers of attorney and agents is cumbersome and invariably complicates, and often delays, the conclusion of the transaction. Moreover, for foreign investors who reside in distant parts of the world and lack trusted local contacts in Florida, using a power of attorney is generally out of the question. Being able to remotely close on a deal they negotiated during an earlier visit to Florida not only saves them another trip; the option of an online closing removes the bulk of impediments to the long-distance investment.
Remote online notarization has the potential to not only drive Florida real estate sales, but, perhaps more importantly, to increase the amount of foreign direct business investment in the state. Florida has historically attracted foreign business investment from South America and Europe; much higher levels of B2B investment via mergers, acquisitions and joint ventures from cash-rich Asia has traditionally been focused on California and the West Coast. Remote online notarization removes barriers to contemplated business deals by removing the logistical problems of closings and, properly communicated, can serve to lure such investors from the West Coast to Florida, driving growth and creating jobs.
For high net worth investors with busy lives who reside on the other side of the planet and have many investment options, the need to physically return to Florida to close on a purchase can often be a deal breaker. Remote online notarization will permit such investors to make an informed investment decision when they are here negotiating their purchase, knowing that the deal can be concluded without another trip halfway around the world. While the new law may not substantially affect sophisticated high net worth foreign investors with established legal and financial relationships in the United States (and, accordingly, those who can facilitate closing logistics), the big winners will be small to mid-size real estate and business investors who lack such contacts in Florida.
The real estate community is clear on how remote online notarization can favorably impact their industry, but the potential upside for law firms, accounting firms and financial advisers is equally compelling. Using the same video-conferencing technology mandated for the remote online notarization process, professionals who advise foreign clients contemplating investments in the states can use this technology to guide prospective buyers through the negotiation, due diligence and planning processes. These Florida professionals can expand their use of technology to ensure that after the contract is signed, everything that happens from that point through closing can be handled virtually.
The passage of the remote online notarization law represents a significant milestone for the state of Florida. Properly communicated by the State, by wealth advisers and by all Floridians who provide professional services to foreign investors, remote online notarization can represent a powerful tool for stimulating direct foreign investment in Florida.
José E. Latour is founding partner at LatourLaw, which has offices in Miami and Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Latour, who is a former U.S. Consul to Mexico under the Reagan administration, handles business immigration.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllData Breaches, Increased Regulatory Risk and Florida’s New Digital Bill of Rights
7 minute readNavigating Florida's Products Liability Law: Defective Products, Warnings and the Pursuit of Justice
6 minute readNavigating Florida Property Insurance Claims in a Post-Fee-Shifting World
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250