Opponents Sue to Challenge Miami's OK for Magic City Innovation District
The lawsuit seeks to overturn city approval of the project planned in Little Haiti as well as City Commission rejection of a resident's request to intervene.
July 31, 2019 at 02:26 PM
6 minute read
Miami broke its laws by approving the sprawling Magic City Innovation District development and ignored case law when it shot down a resident's push to formally object, opponents claim in a lawsuit.
A petition asks the court to overturn both City Commission approval of the project in Miami's Little Haiti neighborhood and rejection of resident Warren Perry's request to intervene.
The City Commission approved the project in June even though it's not in line with the broad Miami 21 zoning code and other documents guiding growth, the Miami-Dade Circuit Court complaint said. The challengers said the process and proposal also broke city regulations.
Miami City Attorney Victoria Mendez said in an emailed statement that the city is “disappointed” a lawsuit was filed, especially because the project will benefit the city.
“We will defend the city's interest and look forward to a swift resolution,” she added.
The lawsuit insinuated city officials are partial to well-heeled developers and snub residents who question to new projects.
“The equity-centered directives are too often treated by city officials as lofty ambitions that stand in the way of 'progress,' ” attorneys say in the complaint.
Meena Jagannath, co-founder of the nonprofit Miami public interest law firm Community Justice Project Inc., and Miami attorney David Winker filed the lawsuit.
Community Justice Project represented residents on the intervenor applications. Winker figures prominently in other real estate-centric litigation including lawsuits against the David Beckham soccer stadium at the city-owned Melreese golf course.
Winker said the dynamic in the city results in “ special deals for special people,” eroding “communities' trust in democracy and the commitment of elected leaders to uphold the law.”
City Commissioners Willy Gort, Manolo Reyes and Keon Hardemon on June 27 gave final approval after rejecting Perry's application to intervene. Commission Chairman Ken Russell and Commissioner Joe Carollo left the meeting before the 1 a.m. vote after a four-hour review at the end of a daylong commission meeting.
Perry lives less than 300 feet from the project and claims he will be impacted by noise, traffic, decreased walkability and other negatives.
Hardemon, who represents Little Haiti, said at the June meeting that Community Justice Project attorneys failed to prove Perry, a tenant in a rent-controlled building, has legal standing. Hardemon didn't respond to a request for comment by deadline.
Noting Perry rents his home was a way to minimize his position in the development dispute, Jagannath and Winker said in the complaint. A Florida Supreme Court decision and even the city itself in an unrelated case have said proximity is closely related to standing.
“Finding that he is not an 'aggrieved party' entitled to standing creates an inherent illegality or irregularity,” the complaint said.
The complaint said the city approved the project even though developers and their representatives didn't submit required application documents, made presentations with little input from experts and the building plan fails to provide for buffers and transitions between Magic City and its neighbors. The commission also ignored calls from the planning department to offer affordable housing either in the new development or nearby.
The 17-building Magic City district is planned in an area dominated by two- and three-story warehouses, shops and residences where construction up to 10 stories is allowed.
Buildings up to 24 stories were approved under a special area plan, which allows more intensive development in exchange for public benefits like parks.
Developers Plaza Equity Partner, Metro 1 and Dragon Global as well as Cirque du Soleil founder Guy Laliberte as an investor tout Magic City as a district that will offer educational and training opportunities in the communications, technology and creative industries. The project also will include residential towers, a hotel, offices and retail.
Opponents say it will intensify gentrification by increasing property values and pushing out existing residents.
The developers pledged $31 million for a Little Haiti Revitalization Trust for affordable housing and other community needs in lieu of a previous commitment to build affordable and workforce housing on and near the site.
The design will isolate neighbors and “create an unwelcoming environment to those who do not fit the target population for the development,” the complaint said.
Neil Fairman, a project partner with Plaza Equity, in an emailed statement called the lawsuit meritless, adding that it hurts the community Perry and the Community Justice Project “profess to help.”
The suit delays the over $40 million the project will give to the community, including $6 million out of the $31 million that's to be paid soon.
The court will side with Magic City and developers are moving forward as planned, Fairman added.
“For over two years, MCID has worked to develop a plan in conjunction with the community that will redevelop obsolete, industrial warehouses and vacant land, while ensuring the project creates jobs, provides the largest community benefits package ever provided to Little Haiti, and preserves and enhances the Haitian and Caribbean culture that has thrived in the community for decades,” Fairman said.
The suit counters the notion that the site is “obsolete,” which proponents have made previously as well. The Magic City trailer park once was on the site but then demolished to make room for the innovation district, displacing about 40 families, according to the complaint.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250