Airbnb, Miami Beach Settlement Requires Listers to Show Tax Receipts
The lawsuit brought by Airbnb against Miami Beach was dismissed and settled in the Southern District of Florida. The property rental company originally filed suit against the city in January, alleging Miami Beach's rules concerning short-term rentals violated federal law.
August 05, 2019 at 04:42 PM
5 minute read
A legal battle between Airbnb Inc. and Miami Beach over government oversight reached a conclusion with a settlement agreement.
A federal lawsuit brought by the property rental company against the city was dismissed from the Southern District of Florida after mediation proceedings produced a settlement between the parties. The suit was filed in January and contended Miami Beach’s rules and regulations regarding short-term rentals abridged Airbnb’s rights and would hobble the company’s ability to conduct business.
The complaint took specific issue with a Miami Beach ordinance, which required companies such as Airbnb to display a city business tax receipt and resort tax certification alongside listings. Anyone seeking to lease out a property is required by law to obtain these registration numbers in order to make short-term rental listings in the city. According to the suit, the provision of Miami Beach’s law requiring Airbnb to monitor and verify that each listing included these licenses infringed on federal protections concerning material generated by third parties.
“The burden to Airbnb of reviewing third-party content to alter, prohibit or remove listings would not be measured solely by the static number of listings at a single point in time, but would be an ongoing and expanding burden,” the suit said, noting “hosts can add new listings, change the status of listings, and deactivate listings” at any given moment. “ Airbnb then, too, would have to monitor for every change constantly,” the suit said.
The lawsuit asserted Miami Beach’s ordinance “would cause a significant disruption to Airbnb’s operations and impose substantial personnel and other costs” on the company.
Read the stipulations of the settlement:
The settlement has amended the provisions of Miami Beach’s laws surrounding short-term rentals. A statement on the settlement by Airbnb noted the responsibility for verifying the validity of a host’s registration numbers now falls on the city, rather than the company. However, Airbnb must now provide mandatory fields for hosts to input the license numbers required to list their properties for short-term rentals.
Airbnb called the settlement a “win-win breakthrough” for the company and Miami Beach in a statement.
“It is a win for our hosts who will have certainty as to the rules and a win for the city when it comes to having a regulatory framework that will work,” the statement said, noting Airbnb has worked out similar arrangements promoting “fair regulatory frameworks and partnerships” with municipalities around the world. “We look forward to providing the city the tools they will need to support compliance, delivering revenue as part of this agreement and further infusing a positive economic impact for the city and its residents.”
The statement provided by Miami Beach said the city was “victorious” against Airbnb.
“Airbnb, recognizing that they were going to unequivocally lose the federal lawsuit against the City of Miami Beach, agreed to pay the municipality $380,000 for its attorney fees expended in defense of their frivolous federal lawsuit,” the statement said. “Airbnb shall be complying with the requirement of the ordinance mandating the display of the resort tax account and business tax receipt numbers for each individual listing by their hosts within those permitted areas in Miami Beach. Airbnb will be prohibited from displaying any listing that does not have these numbers and will be subject to fines and penalties for failure to comply with the disclosure requirement of the ordinance.”
Although the city claimed the company will be paying for attorney fees as part of the settlement, paragraph 10 of the stipulation of the settlement said “Airbnb hereby agrees to dismiss this action against the city without prejudice and with each party to bear its own attorney’s fees and costs.” The company declined to comment on the discrepancy between the statement and Thursday’s filing.
The stipulation states Airbnb will contribute $380,000 to Miami Beach “which it may use in its discretion, including to educate residents about home-sharing rules and/or for the enforcement” of short-term rental regulations.
“Obviously this was a frivolous lawsuit and it was wise of Airbnb to pay our legal fees as part of its resolution,” Miami Beach Mayor Dan Gelber said in the statement. “They will now have to comply with the city ordinance.”
Related stories:
City of Miami Beach Challenged for Excessive Fines in Suit Over Short-Term Rental Ordinance
Bad News for Airbnb: Miami Court Reinstates Ban on Vacation Rentals
Florida Blacklists Airbnb Over Israeli Rental Policy, GC Denies Discrimination
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Close Our Borders?' Senate Judiciary Committee Examines Economics, Legal Predicate for Mass Deportation Proposal
3 minute readBig Law Assembles as Cruise Lines Clinch Partial Victory in $439M Havana Docks Suit
Marriott's $52M Data Breach Settlement Points to Emerging Trend
Trending Stories
- 1GOP-Led SEC Tightens Control Over Enforcement Investigations, Lawyers Say
- 2Transgender Care Fight Targets More Adults as Georgia, Other States Weigh Laws
- 3Roundup Special Master's Report Recommends Lead Counsel Get $0 in Common Benefit Fees
- 4Georgia Justices Urged to Revive Malpractice Suit Against Retired Barnes & Thornburg Atty
- 5How Gibson Dunn Lawyers Helped Assemble the LA FireAid Benefit Concert in 'Extreme' Time Crunch
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250