South Florida Lawyers Win $10.6M Verdict for Family of Late-Life Smoker
If, like many smokers, Janice Hamilton had got hooked on cigarettes as an adolescent, Rosen and Wald would have been able to show jurors a trove of historic records depicting how tobacco companies targeted children and young people. But those documents were off-limits in this case.
August 05, 2019 at 03:10 PM
7 minute read
Fort Lauderdale lawyers Eric S. Rosen and Kimberly L. Wald of Kelley Uustal landed a $10.6 million jury verdict against R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. for the family of a smoker who died of small-cell lung cancer.
But it wasn’t a typical Engle progeny case, because the smoker, Janice Hamilton, hadn’t picked up her first pack of cigarettes until she was 31.
If, like some other smokers, Hamilton had become hooked on cigarettes as an adolescent, Rosen and Wald would have been able to show jurors a trove of historic records depicting how Big Tobacco targeted children and young people. But those documents were off-limits in this case.
“That was a hurdle we had to face,” Rosen said. “But the idea is that whether you’re 15, or you’re 31 or 40, and you pick up a cigarette, there’s a very high potential for getting addicted.”
The form of lung cancer Hamilton contracted was particularly aggressive, according to Rosen, who said the chances of survival were slim from the moment Hamilton was diagnosed in August 1990.
“You can’t operate on it. You can’t remove it, because it spreads so fast,” Rosen said. “You can use medicines to kind of prolong life, but even if it’s caught at the early stages you’re looking at 18 to 24 months of survival.”
Hamilton’s health deteriorated rapidly, according to Wald, until the cancer spread to her brain and spine, causing paralysis from the waist down.
“The specific way that it formed in her body was even more aggressive, and was really difficult on the family,” Wald said. “The last few months of her life were very difficult.”
Hamilton died within two years of her diagnosis, in December 1992. She had two favorite brands—Winston and Old Gold—and had started smoking in 1955, after all three of her children had already been born. The youngest was a newborn suffering from colic, a digestive disorder that Hamilton’s children said prompted her to take up smoking, as it helped her stay awake at odd hours.
Hamilton was in good shape before the cancer struck, according to Wald. She was a stay-at-home mother who’d spent most of her life in Massachusetts life taking care of her three children, until they moved to Florida in 1986. Her children brought the wrongful death suit on her behalf in May 2008.
Cory Hohnbaum, Patrick Price, Spencer Diamond, Austin Evans and Drew Bell of King & Spalding represented R.J. Reynolds with Fort Lauderdale attorneys Eric Lundt and Robert Weill of GrayRobinson. They did not respond to requests for comment by deadline.
The defendant denied liability, arguing lack of standing and failure to state a claim, and said its manufacturing processes conformed with industry standards at the time. At trial, Hohnbaum argued that Hamilton didn’t start smoking as a result of industry advertings or claims about smoking, and had made no real attempts to quit, according to Rosen and Wald.
Plaintiff counsel not only had to prove that Hamilton’s lung cancer was caused by cigarettes, but also that she was addicted to them, as opposed to simply choosing to smoke because she enjoyed it.
They did this by arguing she was too addicted to put down the cigarettes. They argued Hamilton had made few attempts to quit in the 45 years she had smoked. And testimony from Hamilton’s family revealed that she was a chain smoker, who had only tried to abruptly stop a couple of times, in the late 1950s and late 1980s.
“A lot of the times with Engle progeny cases, one of the ways that is helpful for us as the plaintiffs to prove addiction is to say they tried to quit smoking at all these different times in their life,” Wald said. “But here with Janice, the undisputed testimony from all three kids was that there was never a period in her life, after she was 31 until she passed away, that she could refrain more than three hours from smoking.”
Rosen and Wald forged ahead with an argument that the cigarette was used as a “perfect engine for addiction,” using testimony from a Stanford University history professor who explained how cigarettes are designed, how tobacco and chemicals are added and how companies controlled the form and level of nicotine delivered in an effort to create and sustain addiction in customers.
The plaintiffs attorneys focused on formerly secret records that revealed a history of fraud and concealment by tobacco companies, most of which is usually news to jurors, in Rosen’s experience.
“As time’s gone by, most people just aren’t aware of what this industry has done over the years,” Rosen said.
What’s shocking, in Wald’s view, is that the most damning evidence came from the defendant’s own documents.
“You hear about it, but when you actually see the physical documents, that’s in their own words, it’s unbelievable the amount of information that these jurors learn about during a trial,” Wald said. “We always joke and say that they should receive college credit for it, but they should, because it’s learning this whole history of this whole industry.”
One document that was particularly impactful, according to Rosen, was one dating back to the 1960s that said, “Nicotine is addictive. We are then in the business of selling nicotine, an addictive drug,” and, “We can control precisely the levels of nicotine to any level management might desire,” even though tobacco companies collectively denied nicotine was addictive until around 2000.
Jurors found Hamilton was addicted to the cigarettes that caused her cancer, for which she was 22.5% at fault. R.J. Reynolds bore the rest of the blame, as jurors saw it. They awarded $2 million to each of Hamilton’s adult children, just shy of the $2.5 million Rosen and Wald had sought for each sibling. Jurors also awarded $4.6 million in punitive damages, reserved for the punishment of outrageous conduct.
It’s unusual for the children of a smoker to serve as a personal representative in Engle progeny cases, which are usually led by surviving spouses. But Hamilton’s husband died in the 1980s, so Wald said the verdict meant a lot to Hamilton’s children, who are now in their 40s and 50s.
“The fact that the jury could understand and appreciated the gravity of their loss, and still award that money to adult survivors who now have their own children, who have their own lives, is a little bit unusual,” Wald said.
The defense has moved to vacate the verdict and asked for a new trial, but Broward Circuit Judge Michael A. Robinson denied that request.
The court also granted the plaintiffs’ request for attorney fees, but is yet to rule on the amount.
Read the jury verdict:
Case: Robert Hamilton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco
Case no.: CACE08019632
Description: Products liability/tobacco litigation
Filing date: May 2, 2008
Verdict date: July 9, 2019
Judge: Broward Circuit Judge Michael A. Robinson
Plaintiffs attorneys: Kimberly L. Wald and Eric S. Rosen, Kelley Uustal, Fort Lauderdale
Defense attorneys: Patrick Price, Spencer Diamond, Austin Evans, Cory Hohnbaum and Drew Bell, King & Spalding; Eric Lundt and Robert Weill, GrayRobinson, Fort Lauderdale
Verdict amount: $10.6 million
More verdicts and settlements:
Miami Lawyers Land $4.2M Judgment Against Swinerton Builders Over Late, ‘Disorganized’ Project
South Florida Lawyers Secure $5 Million Settlement Over Car Dealer’s Spam Texts
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAutomaker Pleads Guilty and Agrees to $1.6 Billion in Payouts
'I've Seen Terrible Things': Lawyer Predicts Spike in Hazing Suits
Florida Retention Ponds Scrutinized in Lawsuit After Latest Child Drowning
Trending Stories
- 1Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
- 2CFPB Resolves Flurry of Enforcement Actions in Biden's Final Week
- 3Judge Orders SoCal Edison to Preserve Evidence Relating to Los Angeles Wildfires
- 4Legal Community Luminaries Honored at New York State Bar Association’s Annual Meeting
- 5The Week in Data Jan. 21: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250