Apartment Tower Scores $70 Million to Rise in Miami Growth Area
The Esplanade apartment building will open next year in unincorporated Miami-Dade County north of Miami Shores and east of Biscayne Park, an area posed for growth and development.
August 06, 2019 at 02:00 PM
4 minute read
An apartment mid-rise building secured a $70 million construction loan, bringing it closer to rising in a Miami area poised for growth and development.
Esplanade will be an eight-story, 402-unit multifamily tower on 5.8 acres that are vacant at 11150 Biscayne Blvd. It’s an unincorporated Miami-Dade County pocket north of Miami Shores, east of Biscayne Park and south of North Miami.
The project will rise on the west side of Biscayne north of the Aldi discount supermarket and south of the organic food market Whole Foods.
The area is expected to be the next frontier where developers set their sights for new projects as the real estate market continues to boom.
“People are always looking for new areas in Miami to grow and expand,” said attorney Elena Otero, who worked on the financing deal.
And this neighborhood is it, she added.
Otero, a partner at Holland & Knight in Miami, represented lender Ocean Bank in the financing deal. At the community bank, executive vice president and chief lending officer Ralph Gonzalez-Jacobo and senior vice president and corporate lending group manager Federico Tunnermann led negotiations.
The deal closed June 26.
Developer AMAC Holdings LLC, or Arbor Management Acquisition Co., is a New York-based real estate investment firm that focuses on multifamily. It’s part of the Arbor family of companies that include publicly traded Arbor Realty Trust Inc., a real estate investment trust that focuses on multifamily properties, mezzanine and bridge loans, preferred equity investments, mortgage related securities and other real estate assets, according to its website.
This is the first time Otero and Ocean Bank worked with AMAC.
“Obviously, when it’s a first-time borrower for any institution there’s no underlying documents that have been negotiated, so we do negotiate more for a deal of this size,” Otero said. “We did a fair amount of negotiation, but it was really friendly.”
The different sides reached a middle ground on all the sticky points, Otero added, although she declined to provide specifics of the negotiations and issues.
The deal aligned in part because the area is poised for growth and development. Also, there’s a healthy demand for apartments both in this area and across the South Florida region.
“We ultimately feel that the area where this project is going to be built is an area with a great upside and marketability,” Gonzalez-Jacobo said. “The product that they are doing is going to be a product that has a lot of features that will make it extremely attractive. We should have a very, very positive market acceptance.”
South Florida is experiencing steady population growth, and the high cost of buying a home is driving residents to rent. This pent-up demand resulted in low vacancies, robust development and healthy interest from investors scooping up apartment properties.
There also is pent-up demand for apartments specifically in the area where Esplanade will rise.
“I shouldn’t say there’s no new product” there, Gonzalez-Jacobo said. “But there isn’t an overabundance of new product in that area. The project’s feasibility, the appraisal, our independent analysis reflects there’s demand within that market for the product we are going to be financing.”
Esplanade will have units ranging from 680 to 1,400 square feet.
Otero and Gonzalez-Jacobo didn’t disclose the range of the number of bedrooms or the expected rents, only saying that 51 of the units will be workforce housing.
Workforce housing unit rents are less than market rate but still cost more than affordable housing.
The tower will have a gym, a concierge, a pool and a library.
The loan covers 70% of the about $100 million construction cost. The loan has a combination of fixed and floating interest rates.
Esplanade will be finished in late 2020.
“We think it’s an area that’s going to be invigorated in the next few years,” Otero said, “so I think we will see a lot of change in this area with this project and some other projects I am sure will pop up as well.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1Former Google Legal Exec Joins Ad Tech Unicorn as GC
- 2Fenwick and Baker & Hostetler Add DC Partners, as Venable and Brownstein Hire Policy Advisers
- 3H&R Block Accused of Negligence in Data Breach Suit
- 4Apple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
- 5Following Treasury Hack, Do Federal Cybersecurity Standards Need an Update?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250