Legal Aid Groups Bring Class Action Against Florida Agencies Over Medicaid Terminations
The Florida Agency for Health Care Administration and the Florida Department of Children and Families were named in a putative class action lawsuit accusing the organizations of abridging federal law and the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution by improperly stripping Florida residents of Medicaid benefits.
August 09, 2019 at 04:27 PM
5 minute read
Child at hospital. Photo: Dmytro Zinkevych/Shutterstock.com
A new proposed class action lawsuit in Florida has accused state agencies of wrongfully terminating Florida residents’ Medicare coverage on a systemic basis.
The complaint alleged the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration and the Florida Department of Children and Families have repeatedly abridged the due-process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, as well as federal Medicare law, in their treatment of beneficiaries.
According to the suit, the defendants have engaged in a “pattern and practice of terminating Medicaid benefits for individuals whose coverage would continue” under separate qualifications and additional review.
The named plaintiffs, Clayton Harrell and Austin Trueblood, were purportedly not notified that their Medicaid benefits had ended, although they both remained eligible for the program under different categories outside the ones in which they had originally enrolled.
“Since 2014, the legal services organizations of undersigned counsel have represented at least 30 individuals who lost their Medicaid coverage due to termination of an adoption subsidy or [Supplemental Security Income] benefits and for whom defendants failed to conduct an ex-parte review of their continued eligibility under another Medicaid category,” the complaint said.
The suit claimed both Harrell and Trueblood were entitled to conduct hearings challenging the termination of their Medicaid enrollment, as well as receive ongoing coverage pending the outcome of their appeal.
The putative class would comprise individuals who were stripped of their Medicaid because their eligibility through Florida’s Adoption Assistance program or federal disability benefits concluded, “but who may remain eligible for another category of Medicaid,” according to the lawsuit.
Read the class action complaint:
“The legal services organizations … rely on individuals contacting them and it is unknown how many individuals are not aware of their services but may nonetheless be impacted by defendants’ failures,” the suit said. “Without assistance from undersigned counsels’ organizations to enforce their right to continued Medicaid eligibility and educate them about their right to adequate, pre-termination notice and hearing, these individuals would likely still be without Medicaid.”
Katy DeBriere, legal director of Florida Health Justice Project, told the Daily Business Review the proposed class might number in the thousands. She said the litigation’s origins lie with identical cases litigated by her and peers at Jacksonville Area Legal Aid and Disability Rights Florida. DeBriere said she and other advocates “were really tired of fixing these issues on an individual basis.”
“I can’t even imagine the amount of people who don’t realize it’s a legal issue, and they can call for legal help,” she said. “We would like to see this issue fixed on a systemic basis because we’ve seen too many clients to whom this has happened.”
The complaint noted “by its own admission, DCF does not employ a sufficient amount of staff” to correctly process Florida residents’ Medicare eligibility.
“All the written policies with DCF say the right things, they’re just not happening,” DeBriere said, adding additional staffing and more thorough information processing could alleviate the problems experienced by her clients. “Ideally we’d be working with these state agencies to come up with fixes to make sure people are not falling through the cracks. So we need to have a conversation, whether that be through litigation or sitting in mediation, and ask why aren’t these policies being implemented?”
DCF’s media office did not return requests for comment by press time. Patrick Manderfield, deputy communications director with the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration, said the agency does not comment on pending litigation.
Florida’s Children First founder and Talenfeld Law managing partner Howard Talenfeld said he’s observed the circumstances outlined in the complaint in his own practice. Talenfeld, a longtime advocate for children’s rights and on child-disability issues, is not involved in the class-action litigation. But he said Florida has an extensive history of being sued over inadequate welfare and disability programs.
“We’ve seen Medicaid extraordinarily limit services to its clients on many fronts,” Talenfeld said, noting problems such as those detailed in the suit stem in part from significant budget cuts to public assistance programs. The attorney added Florida courts have been “extremely supportive” of certified classes with similar allegations.
“This case is extremely concerning, because we know that when they fall off of Medicaid or the adoption subsidies end, these children are without resources to fully transition into adulthood,” he said. “I’m extremely hopeful that the agency leaders … will respond to these serious allegations with corrective action.”
Related stories:
Florida Reaches Settlement Agreement in Kids’ Medicaid Case
Tenet Defeats Medicare Advantage Class Action Alleging Overpayments
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/28/90/106b497d4c2abf86218e4414ada2/attorney-fees-767x633.jpg)
Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute read![US Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe US Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2024/10/Trump-Cannon-767x633.jpg)
US Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute read![New Trouble for Allstate: National Class Action Targets Insurer New Trouble for Allstate: National Class Action Targets Insurer](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/98/ca/4dd6a947421bbc9c53aad7b8dd51/allstate-insurance-2-767x633.jpg)
![Read the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions Read the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2024/07/Trump-Smith-767x633-1.jpg)
Read the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Public Notices/Calendars
- 2Wednesday Newspaper
- 3Decision of the Day: Qui Tam Relators Do Not Plausibly Claim Firm Avoided Tax Obligations Through Visa Applications, Circuit Finds
- 4Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-116
- 5Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250