Arsenic, Lead, Other Pollutants Found at New Miami Civil Courthouse Site
The pollutants, which are present above accepted levels, won't deter the new courthouse but could push costs up and push back completion.
August 12, 2019 at 03:28 PM
5 minute read
The downtown Miami site picked for a new courthouse has arsenic, lead and other pollutants, according to a memo by Miami-Dade County. The courthouse can still be built there, but whether the necessary cleanup would push back completion and how much costs would be affected aren’t clear, the county said.
Miami-Dade County is developing a new civil and probate courthouse on a vacant half acre it owns along Flagler Street between the existing courthouse and the Metromover tracks. The new facility is needed because the existing one, built 91 years ago at 73 W. Flagler St., has termites, mold, and water and plumbing leaks.
The new site’s soil has contaminants present in quantities above what scientists have deemed as acceptable and harmless, according to the July 1 memo. Arsenic also is present in the groundwater.
“Generally speaking there’s a certain level permitted to exist within the soil and groundwater where it’s not deemed to be a hazard or unsafe to build on,” said Dan Chatlos, Miami-Dade Internal Services Department strategic program director. “The groundwater and soil samples that were gathered at the project site exceeded what’s permitted.”
The property will have to be cleaned up before construction starts, Chatlos said.
The other metals present above accepted levels are cadmium, chromium and lead. There also are polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, including benzo(a)anthracene and benzo(a)pyrene, according to the environmental report.
Some of these could be harmful, including to people’s nervous and respiratory systems, and some are carcinogens. Benzo(a)anthracene is a carcinogen that also is in tobacco smoke.
The finding comes as the county is selecting a developer for the public-private project in which the developer would front the cost and build the facility, and the county would pay back over time.
The county last year projected $1.2 billion in payments over 30 years, but this likely didn’t include any environmental cleanup costs, Chatlos said.
If there is a cleanup cost, then the developer would cover it and then the county would pay back the developer through its annual installments.
Beyond the payments to the developer, the county already is paying because of the contamination. It had to shell out nearly $15,900 for follow-up testing recommended by the environmental consultant, Chatlos said.
Once the additional testing is done, the county will have a better idea how much money, if any at all, it would end up paying for cleanup, Chatlos said.
The exact cause of the pollution is unknown, although the report points out the land used to be a railroad right of way.
Railroad mogul Henry Flagler significantly grew Florida’s railway system in the late 1800s and early 1900s, including expanding into downtown Miami.
“It’s typical for sites that were rights of way for railroads to have issues with arsenic and other sorts of contamination. Historically that’s been the case,” Chatlos said.
If there is a cleanup cost the county didn’t foresee, then it would be the second increase in the annual installments the county would end up paying the developer.
Last year, the county determined that it would pay $38.7 million for the first year it occupies the courthouse, 49% more than the $26 million previously announced due to rising interest rates, rising construction costs and building at this site.
Mayor Carlos Gimenez had pushed for a different county-owned site north of the Flagler spot, but commissioners overrode him after the legal community overwhelmingly said it wanted to stay close to Flagler.
The Flagler location is smaller, requiring a taller, more expensive building, as well as an $800,000 annual rent from the county to satisfy the conditions of a grant it used to buy the site. The county used a Federal Transit Administration grant in 1979, and it must pay market rent if it chooses to use the land for nontransit uses.
Construction is to start in July 2020, although the county is moving ahead of schedule. It expects to select a developer in November, five months sooner than expected, Chatlos said.
Five development teams applied and the county narrowed down the list to three. They are M-S-E Judicial Partners LLC, a partnership of the DLR Group and Suffolk Construction; Plenary Group USA Concessions Ltd., whose partners include design and architectural firm HOK and Los Angeles-based Tutor Perini Corp.; and Sacyr Infrastructure USA, a partnership of Sacyr SA, AECOM and Plaza Construction.
The team of Coral Gables-based Florida East Coast Industries LLC and El Paso, Texas-based Hunt Cos. Inc., originally an alternate in case the three top-ranked teams failed to submit plans, is now out as all three turned in proposals.
FECI is the parent company of the Virgins Trains USA passenger train that connects the downtowns of Miami, Fort Lauderdale and West Palm Beach.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250