Styrofoam is Back: Florida Appellate Court Strikes Down Coral Gables' Ban, Prohibits Similar Laws
The Third District Court of Appeal Wednesday ruled that statewide legislation preempted the city's law prohibiting vendors from selling or using plastic foam containers.
August 14, 2019 at 04:32 PM
5 minute read
Waterway in Coral Gables. Photo: Jorge R. Gonzalez/Shutterstock.com
A South Florida appellate court has delivered a major blow to municipalities looking to enact what they say are eco-friendly rules and regulations against nonbiodegradable waste.
Florida's Third District Court of Appeal on Wednesday ruled against Coral Gables' law prohibiting the use of food-related polystyrene containers, widely branded as Styrofoam.
The appellate panel's opinion, which reversed and remanded a Miami-Dade Circuit Court judgment favoring the city, held that Florida statutes superseded the rule.
"The trial court, in finding three state statutes unconstitutional, relied exclusively on the presumption that ordinances are valid, but failed to consider the strong, competing presumption that 'statutes come clothed with a presumption of constitutionality and must be construed whenever possible to effect a constitutional outcome," the opinion said.
The matter came before the Third DCA following an appeal from business advocacy group the Florida Retail Federation, and its member, Coral Gables-based business Super Progreso.
The litigation began in July 2016, about four months after Coral Gables banned the sale and use of plastic foam. Super Progreso and the Florida Retail Federation challenged the legality of that ordinance, filing a complaint against the city in Miami-Dade Circuit Court.
Their lawsuit sought an injunction and declaratory relief against Coral Gables for violating state laws, which forbid local governments from implementing "any rule regulation, or ordinance regarding use, disposition, sale, prohibition, restriction, or tax of . . . auxiliary containers, wrappings or disposable plastic bags."
The complaint also cited a state law prohibiting municipalities from overseeing the "regulation of the use or sale of polystyrene products," such as Styrofoam.
After the trial court ruled in the city's favor, the plaintiffs appealed in March 2017.
Wednesday's appellate opinion specified the same Florida statutes as the initial complaint but disagrees with the lower court's determination that the state statutes were unconstitutional and "lack the necessary standards and guidelines for implementation, rendering them unconstitutionally vague."
Instead, the Third DCA held the laws fail to transfer legislative authority, and do not violate Florida Constitution's nondelegation doctrine.
Read the opinion:
The appellate court also rebuffed Coral Gables' argument that Florida laws concerning disposable containers violated Miami-Dade County's home-rule amendment.
"It is well-established that the Home Rule Amendment must be strictly construed to maintain the supremacy of general laws," the opinion said. "Although [Coral Gables] may have been the first municipality to regulate polystyrene after Jan. 1, 2016, [Florida law] does not impermissibly single out the city or Miami-Dade County."
The ruling concluded that the state laws are unambiguous "and by their plain language preempt the city's ordinance regulating 'polystyrene containers.'"
Dexter Lehtinen and Claudio Riedi of Miami law firm Lehtinen Schultz served as Florida Retail Federation's attorneys during the litigation. Riedi deferred to his client when asked to comment on the ruling.
Scott Shalley, Florida Retail Federation's president and CEO, praised the Third DCA's conclusion.
"We commend the court as this decision reinforces the legislature's ability and authority to govern these issues on a statewide basis," Shalley said.
He added that the order helps ensure Florida remains business-friendly "by avoiding a patchwork of regulations by the more than 400 local governments."
"Our retailers spend millions of dollars every year on identifying ways to reduce our collective ecological footprint," Shalley said. "We will continue to focus on solutions that are based on science and the importance of responsible consumer education and behavior."
Shalley also thanked Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody's office for its assistance in representing the organization. Kylie Mason, spokesperson for the attorney general, declined to comment, citing pending litigation.
Coral Gables City Attorney Miriam Ramos expressed dismay over the ruling, which she says now renders all local regulations governing plastic bags, plastic foam containers and other single-use plastics in violation of Florida law.
"Our legal team is currently reviewing the court's order in depth and developing our recommendations for the City Commission's consideration," she said. "The city remains steadfast in its commitment to protecting our environment, which includes eliminating the use of harmful items like polystyrene and plastic bags. The city also remains wholly committed to defending home rule and local control."
Others litigators who had filed amicus briefs on Coral Gables' behalf also expressed frustration. Among them: Bonnie Malloy, a staff attorney with the Florida branch of environmental law group Earthjustice, and Miami Beach City Attorney Raul Aguila, who both said the decision was a major setback for environmental laws.
Aguila said the opinion marked a sad day for environmentalists and "other local, coastal municipalities, like Surfside and Bal Harbour, which passed legislation banning plastic bags within their jurisdictions, based on the lower court's opinion regarding Coral Gables' ordinance.
"Now that that opinion has been reversed, these cities may have no choice but to repeal their legislation or face the potential of legal challenges to those laws," Aguila said. The appellate order "highlights the continuing negative impact and ongoing challenges that progressive local governments in Florida continue to face."
In the meantime, Ramos said she hopes Coral Gables vendors will stick with any changes they'd made, despite of the city's now-toothless rule.
"I hope that we've effectuated change," she said. "If you've found a more sustainable alternative, we hope that you continue to use that and not go back to using something we know for a fact is very harmful to the environment."
Related stories:
South Florida Litigators Haggle Over Environmental Impact of Deregulation Under Trump
Miami Lawyer Uses Coral Gables' Own Filing to Clinch an Appellate Victory Against It
Law Dismantling Miami-Dade County Expressway Ruled Unconstitutional
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/28/90/106b497d4c2abf86218e4414ada2/attorney-fees-767x633.jpg)
Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute read![US Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe US Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2024/10/Trump-Cannon-767x633.jpg)
US Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute read![New Trouble for Allstate: National Class Action Targets Insurer New Trouble for Allstate: National Class Action Targets Insurer](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/98/ca/4dd6a947421bbc9c53aad7b8dd51/allstate-insurance-2-767x633.jpg)
![Read the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions Read the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2024/07/Trump-Smith-767x633-1.jpg)
Read the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Receives Supreme Court Reprimand: 'Your Behavior Was Unacceptable'
- 2Contracts Game Changer? One-Sided ADR Provision Overturned
- 3Attorney Says Seeking Justice for Inmate's Death Requires Systemic Change as Well as Compensation
- 4Justice 'Weaponization Working Group' Will Examine Officials Who Investigated Trump, US AG Bondi Says
- 5Judge Accuses Trump of Constitutional End Run, Blocks Citizenship Order
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.