5 Miami Judges Facing Discipline: Read the Full Findings and Recommendation
The Judicial Qualifications Commission has recommended a reprimand for Miami-Dade Judges Marcia Caballero, Rosa Figarola, Teresa Pooler, Mavel Ruiz and now-retired Judge Cindy Lederman, who allegedly advanced the corporate interests of a DCF contractor.
August 16, 2019 at 10:28 AM
4 minute read
Five South Florida judges face ethics charges for allegedly using their judicial privilege to favor a company during a competitive bidding process for the Florida Department of Children and Families.
Miami-Dade Judges Marcia Caballero, Rosa Figarola, Teresa Pooler, Mavel Ruiz and now-retired Judge Cindy Lederman are defendants in a new judicial ethics case before the Florida Supreme Court.
The Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission opened the investigation against the judges for allegedly prioritizing contractor Our Kids of Miami-Dade & Monroe Inc. in a competitive bidding process to procure vending services for the Florida Department of Children and Families between 2019 and 2024.
A letter included as an exhibit with the JQC’s formal charges shows the judges advocating for Our Kids in a communication with Rebecca Kapusta and Brownyn Stanford, DCF’s respective interim director and managing director of the southern region. The correspondence, signed by all five judges, speaks out against further privatizing Florida’s child welfare system and requests that DCF retain the services of Our Kids.
As noted by the JQC, Our Kids is a nonprofit that has served as the lead agency in DCF’s community-based care in South Florida for several years.
“The Our Kids board is answerable to the community,” the letter said, describing the group as “our community’s experts in child welfare policy and practice.”
The letter concluded with the judges asserting their complete faith “only in the Our Kids model of leadership.”
“When you select the agency please keep our voices in your mind,” the note said. The DCF vendor contract is worth about $500 million, according to court documents.
The letter was also signed by retired Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Maria Sampedro-Iglesia and General Magistrate Steven Lieberman, who serves in Miami-Dade’s Unified Children’s Court. The JQC wrote Sampedro-Iglesia was not subject to the investigation, and could not address Lieberman’s participation in the letter, since magistrates are not within the commission’s enforcement authority.
According to the JQC’s findings and recommendation of discipline, the investigative panel determined in May that the judges had violated Florida’s Code of Judicial Conduct concerning the maintenance of an independent and impartial judiciary.
Chief Palm Beach Circuit Judge Krista Marx, who chairs the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission, recommended a public reprimand by publication, but the Florida Supreme Court has the final word of judicial discipline.
The investigative panel noted the judges “accepted full responsibility for their actions, admitted that the letter was inappropriate, and otherwise fully cooperated with the JQC’s inquiry.”
“Judges have valuable knowledge and insight into the court system, and they should be allowed and encouraged to share that knowledge,” the recommendation said. “In this case, the respondents’ letter crossed the line from informational, to advocacy in favor of one competitive bidder over another.”
Miami Dade Circuit Court spokeswoman Eunice Sigler declined to speak on the JQC’s findings.
Sigler said, “Since this matter is still pending before the Florida Supreme Court, it would not be appropriate to provide comment at this time.”
|Read the formal charges and findings and recommendation of the JQC.
|Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
3 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250