Web Outreach on Sex Trafficking Connects Accusers to Attorneys, But Raises Questions
While longtime practitioners focusing on sex abuse litigation see ads as evidence of mounting support in the fight against sex trafficking, others say an aggressive online presence might be retraumatizing.
August 19, 2019 at 01:49 PM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Legal Intelligencer
It’s not hard to find advertisements for law firm practices targeting sex trafficking. Web pages about this area of the law are often found among links about auto accident and mass tort cases.
The web pages themselves frequently read like what you’d expect for a slip-and-fall case — “If you or someone you know has been a victim of sex trafficking, you may be entitled to compensation” — and urge victims to contact the firm.
The ads are partly the product of changing laws and public attitudes about sex abuse, human trafficking, and their emergence tracks a recent rise in trafficking litigation.
While longtime practitioners focusing on sex abuse litigation see the response to online outreach as evidence of mounting support in the fight against sex trafficking, others say “aggressive” web-based advertising could add to the dangers, both physical and psychological, that may arise when sex trafficking victims pursue litigation.
“I’m not saying people can’t bring civil actions … but you have to know about human trafficking. You can’t just be any personal injury firm putting out an ad when human trafficking is so complex,” Anita Teekah, senior director on anti-trafficking programs at Safe Horizon in Manhattan, said.
Ever since Congress enacted laws allowing civil recovery from sex trafficking cases, attorneys have been practicing in this area. But as the laws have expanded over the years and the nation has become more understanding of sex abuse, the number of lawsuits have been steadily growing to the point where longtime practitioners are beginning to see a new push by the more traditional personal injury firms to enter the fray.
However, those who have long focused on this work say sex trafficking litigation is unlike any other area of practice. In many cases, the plaintiffs are children, the survivors are always highly traumatized, and often they are still living in dangerous situations, where their phone calls and internet activities could be monitored. And seeing firms increasingly seeking out clients have left some worried that attorneys looking to take on cases could inadvertently end up retraumatizing victims.
|‘Living in Fear’
Some attorneys say aggressive online advertising can give hope to some who have spent a lifetime being abused by people who touted themselves as being trustworthy. Without frequent contact and a realistic notion about the prospects for recovery, the chances the survivor will feel re-victimized are high.
But attorneys say what’s even more pressing is the fact that many victims might still be in physical danger when they reach out.
“These kids are living in fear of their captors, and so we are highly concerned,” said attorney Howard Talenfeld of Fort Lauderdale, who focuses on representing abused, injured and disabled children.
Michael Dolce, who is of counsel at Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll in Palm Beach Gardens, focuses on abuse litigation but does not advertise it. He said there is no need for attorneys to advertise nationally since awareness of trafficking has reached every corner of the country.
“We have an epidemic of sexual violence in our society. I welcome the arrival of more lawyers. We need as many hands on deck as we can get,” he said. “That said, I do want and I do hope that those who join the fight recognize the uniqueness.”
Shea Rhodes of the Villanova Law Institute to Address Commercial Sexual Exploitation said she is concerned about law firms nationally advertising in this area, and that she had even heard of some victims, whose names may have appeared in court records or media reports about prostitution rings, being cold called from law firms.
“Survivors have reached out to me. ‘Do I have to talk to these lawyers? I don’t want to talk to these people. I don’t know them,’” Rhodes said. “I tell them you have the ability to talk to whomever you choose in your life.”
|Online Ethics
Online attorney advertising is increasingly blurring the line between what might seem like obvious advertising and educational sites, and advertisements for sex trafficking litigation is not immune.
Although most ads are focused solely on a firm’s specific sex trafficking practice and are clearly aimed at bringing a case, some appear aimed more at education, and simply outline legal definitions of trafficking, give tips on how to spot trafficking victims, and what broader organizations — like trucking companies or hotels — could be held liable.
While some law firms may say these sites are purely educational, Micah Buchdahl of HTMLawyers in Moorestown, New Jersey, who focuses on legal marketing and ethics, said that argument is a stretch.
“Law firms will sit there and say, ‘This is an education resource. We spend a lot of time and money. We’re educating people. This isn’t advertising. This is education.’ That doesn’t really fly with me, really,” Buchdahl said. “You’re doing it for a reason.”
Buchdahl said that with any online advertising, the key is to be clear about the connection to the law firm, and to make sure the ads are not misleading.
While there is a dividing line between seemingly educational ads aimed at attorneys as opposed to the general public, lawyers might want to be extra cautious when advertising to an especially vulnerable population, Buchdahl said.
“That’s really what the rules were put in place initially to combat. They didn’t want to create a situation where a law firm is able to basically, I don’t want to say take advantage of, but use scare tactics to gain a new client,” he said.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Trending Stories
- 1Red Tape, Talent Wars & Pricey Office Space Greet Firms Entering Saudi Arabia
- 2A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Becoming Clerk of the Forum
- 3Pa. Supreme Court Taps New Philadelphia Family Division Administrative Judge
- 45th Circuit Rules Open-Source Code Is Not Property in Tornado Cash Appeal
- 5Mediators for the Southern District of New York Honored at Eighth Annual James Duane Awards
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250