Carlton Fields Confidentially Settles Legal Malpractice Suit Seeking $15 Million
An ex-client had sought at least $15 million from Carlton Fields in the legal malpractice lawsuit over litigation involving 16 Carlton Fields attorneys from Miami, Coral Gables, Tallahassee, Tampa and New York.
August 21, 2019 at 12:58 PM
2 minute read
Miami-Dade Circuit Judge William Thomas has approved a confidential settlement between Colombia-based pharmaceutical products maker Procaps S.A. and Carlton Fields in Florida, dismissing without prejudice a legal malpractice lawsuit that had sought at least $15 million in damages.
Procaps had claimed that bad advice from Carlton Fields in a federal antitrust lawsuit exposed it to an $18.5 million legal fee award.
The agreement says it's not an admission of liability by either side, who will pay their own attorney fees and costs.
The complaint, filed May 2018, alleged the firm hadn't properly explained the risks of litigating against former joint venture partner Patheon Inc., as Florida's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act allowed the defendant to pursue legal fees after succeeding with a summary judgment. But Procaps alleged that it never would have sued if it knew there was a chance of that happening.
According to online case files, 16 Carlton Fields attorneys in Tampa, Miami, Coral Gables, Tallahassee and New York handled the Procaps litigation.
David P. Ackerman of Akerman's West Palm Beach office represented Carlton Fields.
"The matter was settled and the details are confidential," said Carlton Fields spokesperson Kate Barth.
Likewise, counsel to Procaps, Miami solo practitioner Warren R. Trazenfeld, said his only comment was that case settled and details are confidential.
In its answer to the complaint, Carlton Fields had denied any wrongdoing, arguing that it had acted in good faith under the instruction of its client but that "an attorney does not act as an insurer of the outcome of a case."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All43 States Reach $700 Million Settlement With J&J in Talc Product Lawsuits
Novo Nordisk Files Multiple Complaints Alleging Trademark Infringement, False Advertising Across U.S.
4 minute readOzempic Leadership Fight Escalates: Proposed Co-Leads Are 'Losing Control'
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 2Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 3Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 4'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 5Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250