New Laws Spurring Fla. Community Associations to Implement E-Voting, Websites
Technology has been the focus of many recent changes to Florida laws, including those that now allow community associations to implement electronic voting and require condominium associations with 150 units or more to have a website containing digital copies of certain official records.
August 21, 2019 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
Technology has been the focus of many recent changes to Florida laws, including those that now allow community associations to implement electronic voting and require condominium associations with 150 units or more to have a website containing digital copies of certain official records. These changes have led many of the more than 49,000 community associations in the state to consider how they are using technology to help facilitate their operations and comply with the state laws.
The condominium association website laws mandate that compliant websites should have been operational as of Jan. 1 of this year. The laws call for association websites that are accessible only to unit owners and employees where certain notices, records and documents are posted. These must include the declaration of condominium, bylaws, articles of incorporation, rules and regulations of the association, as well as all executory contracts or documents to which the association is a party, or under which the association or unit owners have an obligation or responsibility.
Condominium association websites must also feature the association’s annual budget and proposed annual budget; financial reports; monthly income or expense statements; copies of bids, or summaries of bids, exceeding $500; association meeting notices, and board member certification forms.
Since 2015, electronic voting has been a technological tool permitted by state law for both condominium and homeowners associations. Boards of directors that wish to implement and authorize an Internet-based voting system for any owner-required vote must first adopt a resolution supporting it at a properly noticed meeting. Once approved by the board, electronic voting may be used for any owner-required vote, as determined on a case-by-case basis at the board’s discretion. Associations must provide owners with notice of the opportunity to vote through an online voting system, and they must also establish reasonable procedures and deadlines for owners to provide written consent for their participation in online voting or to opt out of it after giving consent.
The electronic voting systems implemented by associations must be able to authenticate owners’ identities and receive ballots in a manner that ensures their secrecy and integrity. For board elections, the owner-identifying information must be separated from each ballot to render it impossible to tie authenticated ballots to specific owners. The systems must also be able to store and keep electronic votes accessible for recount, inspection and review purposes.
The Florida laws governing association websites and electronic voting are very specific as to the requirements that these new tools must meet for compliance. While there are several national providers of electronic voting systems that market their services for community associations, these platforms are not focused specifically on Florida community associations, so boards of directors interested in implementing electronic voting using them should first consult with association counsel to determine whether they meet the standards set by the state laws.
Florida-specific electronic voting platforms for associations are also now beginning to appear. One platform that several of our firm’s clients have turned to is ONR app (www.onrapp.com, pronounced “owner”), which uses an online application-based system to offer associations electronic voting as well as e-surveys, alerts and notifications on a secure platform. The Miami-based technology startup also offers association website implementation and administration.
In addition to the cost-efficiency and increased election turnout benefits stemming from electronic voting, the company behind the ONR app believes the smartphone application’s ability to easily and affordably create and distribute owner surveys on topics ranging from major renovation projects to prospective new equipment for the fitness center makes it a game changer for associations.
There is no doubt that electronic voting, surveys and website platforms can help associations maximize transparency and voter turnout, in addition to providing owners with a voice on important decisions. As long as the proper vetting takes place with association counsel to ensure that these tools and platforms meet the standards required by Florida laws, they can quickly become invaluable for associations.
Nicole R. Kurtz is an attorney with the South Florida law firm Siegfried Rivera. She focuses her practice on community association law and is based at the firm’s Coral Gables office. She has been with the firm since 2014 and is a regular contributor to its condo and HOA law blog, www.FloridaHOALawyerBlog.com. For more information, visit www.siegfriedrivera.com or call, 305-442-3334.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
4 minute readData Breaches, Increased Regulatory Risk and Florida’s New Digital Bill of Rights
7 minute readNavigating Florida's Products Liability Law: Defective Products, Warnings and the Pursuit of Justice
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250