New Laws Spurring Fla. Community Associations to Implement E-Voting, Websites
Technology has been the focus of many recent changes to Florida laws, including those that now allow community associations to implement electronic voting and require condominium associations with 150 units or more to have a website containing digital copies of certain official records.
August 21, 2019 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
Technology has been the focus of many recent changes to Florida laws, including those that now allow community associations to implement electronic voting and require condominium associations with 150 units or more to have a website containing digital copies of certain official records. These changes have led many of the more than 49,000 community associations in the state to consider how they are using technology to help facilitate their operations and comply with the state laws.
The condominium association website laws mandate that compliant websites should have been operational as of Jan. 1 of this year. The laws call for association websites that are accessible only to unit owners and employees where certain notices, records and documents are posted. These must include the declaration of condominium, bylaws, articles of incorporation, rules and regulations of the association, as well as all executory contracts or documents to which the association is a party, or under which the association or unit owners have an obligation or responsibility.
Condominium association websites must also feature the association’s annual budget and proposed annual budget; financial reports; monthly income or expense statements; copies of bids, or summaries of bids, exceeding $500; association meeting notices, and board member certification forms.
Since 2015, electronic voting has been a technological tool permitted by state law for both condominium and homeowners associations. Boards of directors that wish to implement and authorize an Internet-based voting system for any owner-required vote must first adopt a resolution supporting it at a properly noticed meeting. Once approved by the board, electronic voting may be used for any owner-required vote, as determined on a case-by-case basis at the board’s discretion. Associations must provide owners with notice of the opportunity to vote through an online voting system, and they must also establish reasonable procedures and deadlines for owners to provide written consent for their participation in online voting or to opt out of it after giving consent.
The electronic voting systems implemented by associations must be able to authenticate owners’ identities and receive ballots in a manner that ensures their secrecy and integrity. For board elections, the owner-identifying information must be separated from each ballot to render it impossible to tie authenticated ballots to specific owners. The systems must also be able to store and keep electronic votes accessible for recount, inspection and review purposes.
The Florida laws governing association websites and electronic voting are very specific as to the requirements that these new tools must meet for compliance. While there are several national providers of electronic voting systems that market their services for community associations, these platforms are not focused specifically on Florida community associations, so boards of directors interested in implementing electronic voting using them should first consult with association counsel to determine whether they meet the standards set by the state laws.
Florida-specific electronic voting platforms for associations are also now beginning to appear. One platform that several of our firm’s clients have turned to is ONR app (www.onrapp.com, pronounced “owner”), which uses an online application-based system to offer associations electronic voting as well as e-surveys, alerts and notifications on a secure platform. The Miami-based technology startup also offers association website implementation and administration.
In addition to the cost-efficiency and increased election turnout benefits stemming from electronic voting, the company behind the ONR app believes the smartphone application’s ability to easily and affordably create and distribute owner surveys on topics ranging from major renovation projects to prospective new equipment for the fitness center makes it a game changer for associations.
There is no doubt that electronic voting, surveys and website platforms can help associations maximize transparency and voter turnout, in addition to providing owners with a voice on important decisions. As long as the proper vetting takes place with association counsel to ensure that these tools and platforms meet the standards required by Florida laws, they can quickly become invaluable for associations.
Nicole R. Kurtz is an attorney with the South Florida law firm Siegfried Rivera. She focuses her practice on community association law and is based at the firm’s Coral Gables office. She has been with the firm since 2014 and is a regular contributor to its condo and HOA law blog, www.FloridaHOALawyerBlog.com. For more information, visit www.siegfriedrivera.com or call, 305-442-3334.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSEC Whistleblower Program: What to Expect Under the Trump Administration
6 minute readTurning the Shock of a January Marital Split Into Effective Strategies for Your Well-Being
5 minute readTrending Issues in Florida Construction Law That Attorneys Need to Be Aware Of
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Ex-Prosecutor Denies on Witness Stand That She Tried to Protect Ahmaud Arbery's Killers
- 2Latham's Lateral Hiring Picks Up Steam, With Firm Adding Simpson Practice Head, Private Equity GC
- 3Legal Restrictions Governing Artificial Intelligence in the Workplace
- 4Failure to Adequately Inform Patients
- 5'FTX' One Year Later: The Impact on Examiner Practice in Bankruptcy Courts
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250