Ousted Broward Sheriff Scott Israel Appeals to Florida Senate for Reinstatement
Israel was removed from office via an executive order by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis in January.
August 21, 2019 at 06:07 PM
5 minute read
Former Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel has formally requested a Florida Senate-appointed special master to recommend that he be restored to his former job as Broward’s top law enforcement officer.
Israel entered his proposed recommendation to Senate Special Master Dudley Goodlette on Wednesday.
The ousted sheriff’s filing follows a two-day June hearing aimed at determining whether the Florida Senate ought to reinstate Israel as Broward County sheriff, or uphold his suspension after Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis used an executive order to forcibly remove Israel from his post in January.
The executive order contended that Israel and the Broward Sheriff’s Office repeatedly demonstrated incompetence and neglect of duty in the field. In justifying Israel’s dismissal, DeSantis referred to the law enforcement office’s widely criticized responses to the Feb. 14, 2018, mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Pinecrest and the attack at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport one year earlier.
Israel had requested a formal review by the Florida Senate on the merits of DeSantis’ suspension shortly after the executive order was issued. He also pursued legal action against DeSantis, alleging the governor had discharged him for political reasons and had abused the gubernatorial suspension authority granted under the Florida Constitution.
The petition for writ of quo warranto filed with the Broward Circuit Court in March argued “the governor may only suspend an elected official for acts or omissions that objectively — not subjectively or politically — demonstrate the official committed malfeasance, misfeasance, neglect of duty, drunkenness, incompetence or demonstrated permanent inability to perform official duties, or commission of a felony.”
Following successive adverse rulings against Israel and subsequent appeals, the Florida Supreme Court entered the final word on the sheriff’s charges in April. The high court ruled DeSantis’ order comported with the Florida Constitution’s standards for suspending public officials.
Read Israel’s recommendation order:
With the legal proceedings concluded, Israel opted to move forward with pleading his case for reinstatement before the Florida Senate.
Kuehne Davis Law partner Benedict “Ben” Kuehne served as Israel’s legal counsel in the lawsuit against DeSantis as well as the hearings in the state Senate. Kuehne characterized his client’s forced removal from office as a ploy by DeSantis to undermine an ideological opponent.
“This is just a political power play to remove a Democrat who opposed NRA positions,” the Miami attorney said. “The governor is not justified in doing something for political reasons; that’s why we have elections.”
Kuehne’s argument before the Florida Senate maintained DeSantis failed to provide a preponderance of evidence that demonstrated that Israel had neglected his responsibilities or proved so incompetent as to justify suspension. Tuesday’s recommendation cited a report which held the former Broward sheriff’s tenure demonstrated “a dramatic reduction in crimes” and increased community outreach. The filing also noted the findings of the Florida Department of Law Enforcement report which led to arrest of former Marjory Stoneman Douglas resource officer Scot Peterson, contending Israel provided adequate active shooter training to BSO employees and could not be held liable for Peterson’s conduct during the assault on the Parkland school.
“Even if the allegations do weigh in on neglect and incompetence, the evidence was overwhelmingly in favor of Sheriff Israel,” Kuehne said, adding his client “not only met all standards, protocols and procedures,” but those were often exceeded by the officers under his command.
“He did his best and the BSO did their best to protect the people of the county, and that is what [is] expected of [an] elected sheriff,” Kuehne said.
The attorney noted before DeSantis’ order, Israel had been re-elected and had intended to run once again in November 2020. Kuehne said even with the numerous legal and political setbacks his client has faced in the court of public opinion, Israel remains committed to fulfilling his obligations as sheriff.
“The sheriff owes a solemn responsibility to the people who overwhelming elected him,” Kuehne said. ”He will not abandon the public’s decision. That was not a decision weighed in by the governor and it should not be a decision for the governor to decide who is elected sheriff.”
Requests for comment from the governor’s office were not returned by press time.
Goodlette will submit a recommendation to the state Senate on whether to reinstate Israel to his position after reviewing the recommendation filings by the former sheriff and DeSantis’ general counsel. Israel has previously stated he will seek reelection in 2020, regardless of the Senate’s ultimate decision.
Kuehne said DeSantis’ suspension order only served to politicize the gun-related tragedies in Broward County.
“The governor’s effort to politicize the work of law enforcement in connection with its handling and responsibility to mass tragedies is itself a tragedy,” he said. “The sheriff is making his best efforts to make clear that law enforcement decisions designed to protect the public are complicated and should not become a political football.”
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Families Settle Court Battle Over Who Owns Parkland Killer's Name, Likeness
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Lululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
- 2Plaintiff Gets $500K Policy Limit Without Surgery
- 3Philadelphia Bar Association Executive Director Announces Retirement
- 4SEC Chair Gary Gensler to Resign on Trump's Inauguration Day
- 5How I Made Partner: 'Develop a Practice Area You Really Care About,' Says Jennifer A. Gniady of Stradley Ronon
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250