Ousted Broward Sheriff Scott Israel Appeals to Florida Senate for Reinstatement
Israel was removed from office via an executive order by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis in January.
August 21, 2019 at 06:07 PM
5 minute read
Former Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel has formally requested a Florida Senate-appointed special master to recommend that he be restored to his former job as Broward’s top law enforcement officer.
Israel entered his proposed recommendation to Senate Special Master Dudley Goodlette on Wednesday.
The ousted sheriff’s filing follows a two-day June hearing aimed at determining whether the Florida Senate ought to reinstate Israel as Broward County sheriff, or uphold his suspension after Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis used an executive order to forcibly remove Israel from his post in January.
The executive order contended that Israel and the Broward Sheriff’s Office repeatedly demonstrated incompetence and neglect of duty in the field. In justifying Israel’s dismissal, DeSantis referred to the law enforcement office’s widely criticized responses to the Feb. 14, 2018, mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Pinecrest and the attack at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport one year earlier.
Israel had requested a formal review by the Florida Senate on the merits of DeSantis’ suspension shortly after the executive order was issued. He also pursued legal action against DeSantis, alleging the governor had discharged him for political reasons and had abused the gubernatorial suspension authority granted under the Florida Constitution.
The petition for writ of quo warranto filed with the Broward Circuit Court in March argued “the governor may only suspend an elected official for acts or omissions that objectively — not subjectively or politically — demonstrate the official committed malfeasance, misfeasance, neglect of duty, drunkenness, incompetence or demonstrated permanent inability to perform official duties, or commission of a felony.”
Following successive adverse rulings against Israel and subsequent appeals, the Florida Supreme Court entered the final word on the sheriff’s charges in April. The high court ruled DeSantis’ order comported with the Florida Constitution’s standards for suspending public officials.
Read Israel’s recommendation order:
With the legal proceedings concluded, Israel opted to move forward with pleading his case for reinstatement before the Florida Senate.
Kuehne Davis Law partner Benedict “Ben” Kuehne served as Israel’s legal counsel in the lawsuit against DeSantis as well as the hearings in the state Senate. Kuehne characterized his client’s forced removal from office as a ploy by DeSantis to undermine an ideological opponent.
“This is just a political power play to remove a Democrat who opposed NRA positions,” the Miami attorney said. “The governor is not justified in doing something for political reasons; that’s why we have elections.”
Kuehne’s argument before the Florida Senate maintained DeSantis failed to provide a preponderance of evidence that demonstrated that Israel had neglected his responsibilities or proved so incompetent as to justify suspension. Tuesday’s recommendation cited a report which held the former Broward sheriff’s tenure demonstrated “a dramatic reduction in crimes” and increased community outreach. The filing also noted the findings of the Florida Department of Law Enforcement report which led to arrest of former Marjory Stoneman Douglas resource officer Scot Peterson, contending Israel provided adequate active shooter training to BSO employees and could not be held liable for Peterson’s conduct during the assault on the Parkland school.
“Even if the allegations do weigh in on neglect and incompetence, the evidence was overwhelmingly in favor of Sheriff Israel,” Kuehne said, adding his client “not only met all standards, protocols and procedures,” but those were often exceeded by the officers under his command.
“He did his best and the BSO did their best to protect the people of the county, and that is what [is] expected of [an] elected sheriff,” Kuehne said.
The attorney noted before DeSantis’ order, Israel had been re-elected and had intended to run once again in November 2020. Kuehne said even with the numerous legal and political setbacks his client has faced in the court of public opinion, Israel remains committed to fulfilling his obligations as sheriff.
“The sheriff owes a solemn responsibility to the people who overwhelming elected him,” Kuehne said. ”He will not abandon the public’s decision. That was not a decision weighed in by the governor and it should not be a decision for the governor to decide who is elected sheriff.”
Requests for comment from the governor’s office were not returned by press time.
Goodlette will submit a recommendation to the state Senate on whether to reinstate Israel to his position after reviewing the recommendation filings by the former sheriff and DeSantis’ general counsel. Israel has previously stated he will seek reelection in 2020, regardless of the Senate’s ultimate decision.
Kuehne said DeSantis’ suspension order only served to politicize the gun-related tragedies in Broward County.
“The governor’s effort to politicize the work of law enforcement in connection with its handling and responsibility to mass tragedies is itself a tragedy,” he said. “The sheriff is making his best efforts to make clear that law enforcement decisions designed to protect the public are complicated and should not become a political football.”
Related stories:
Florida Supreme Court Upholds Gov. DeSantis’ Removal of Ex-Broward Sheriff Scott Israel
Peterson Arrest Adds Wrinkle to Broward Sheriff’s Appeal
Read the Document: Grand Jury Finds ‘Troubling’ Conflicts After Parkland School Shooting
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readUS Judge OKs Partial Release of Ex-Special Counsel's Final Report in Election Case
3 minute readSpecial Counsel Jack Smith Prepares Final Report as Trump Opposes Its Release
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250