Court Paves Path for Donation of Janet Reno's Home to Miami Dade College
The Third District Court of Appeal's ruling followed an appeal from the former U.S. Attorney General's niece, Janet Meliha Reno, who sought to stop the endowment of the property to the school.
August 22, 2019 at 03:07 PM
4 minute read
A Florida appellate court has resolved a familial dispute over the fate of former U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno's home.
The Third District Court of Appeal Wednesday affirmed a Miami-Dade Circuit Court judgment providing for Reno's Kendall property to be donated to Miami Dade College. Reno, who made history as the first woman to serve as Miami-Dade state attorney and U.S. attorney general, died on Nov. 7, 2016.
Reno had originally intended for her lifelong Florida property to be donated to another school—the University of Miami. Her 2008 will had bequeathed the ranch, which was built by Reno's mother in the 1940s, to the university, with the stipulation that the school preserve the property "as-is" in perpetuity.
However, UM declined the gift after Reno's death, reasoning that the property's upkeep and the maintenance of its surrounding natural foliage would prove too costly.
Because Reno never married or had children, the house was left to seven of her nieces and nephews following her death. But the Janet Reno Revocable Trust, which is managed by James Hurchall, opted to honor Reno's charitable intentions for the property despite UM's refusal of the gift. Her estate subsequently arranged for the ranch to be endowed to Miami Dade College.
Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Mindy Glazer approved the alternation of Reno's will in November 2018, and found the substitution of Miami Dade College in the place of UM was legally sound under the cy pres doctrine.
Under Florida statutes, "if a particular charitable purpose becomes unlawful, impracticable, impossible to achieve, or wasteful, the court may apply the doctrine of cy pres to modify or terminate the trust. … In a manner consistent with the settlor's charitable purposes."
Read the opinion:
The matter reached the appellate court after the former Miami prosecutor's niece, Janet Meliha Reno, appealed the lower court's order permitting her aunt's will to be amended.
The Third DCA upheld the trial court's findings, agreeing that because Reno's estate still owned the contested property, and the original parameters of her will could not be fulfilled, the transfer of the property to MDC was lawful.
"The University of Miami's declination to accept the charitable transfer made the original disposition impossible to achieve," the opinion said, adding the situation was "precisely the kind of circumstance" the cy pres doctrine is intended to address. "The successor trustee identified an even-closer charitable, educational institution to accept the gift and to comply fully with Ms. Reno's conditions 'in perpetuity,' respecting the 'unique character' and 'historical importance' of the Reno Homestead."
Coral Gables lawyer Hung Nguyen represented Reno's niece in both the trial and appellate courts. The attorney said he and his client "respectfully disagree" with the appellate court's opinion, and will be exploring additional legal options.
"We believe [the opinion] is contrary to the plain language of Janet Reno's trust, which shows her true intent, the facts and Florida law," the Nguyen Law Firm attorney said. "The opinion is an unprecedented expansion of the cy pres doctrine under Florida law, and infringes upon Floridians' constitutionally protected right to devise their property to whomever they want."
Miami attorney Alan Greer served as legal counsel to Reno's estate. As Reno's longtime friend, Greer said he was honored to work on behalf of her surviving relatives.
"The Reno family—with the exception of the plaintiff in the case—were very gratified by the court's decision," he said, noting the "historical and ecological importance" of Reno's home and its quarter-mile distance from MDC's main campus. "She's an old, old friend of mine, and just being able to ensure that her wishes were complied with is very gratifying to me."
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Trending Stories
- 1Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 2Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 3Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
- 4UN Treaty Enacting Cybercrime Standards Likely to Face Headwinds in US, Other Countries
- 5Clark Hill Acquires L&E Boutique in Mexico City, Adding 5 Lawyers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250