Morgan & Morgan Litigator Lands $1.79M Legal Malpractice Verdict Against Vero Beach Attorney and Law Firm
Business trial lawyer Benjamin Webster represented a client who alleged negligent representation by Aaron Johnson and the Collins Brown Barkett Chartered law firm caused her to lose out on a lucrative real estate commission.
August 27, 2019 at 06:14 PM
3 minute read
An attorney with Morgan & Morgan's Business Trial Group helped a client secure a $1.79 million award from her former counsel in a legal malpractice lawsuit Aug. 23.
Orlando-based litigator Benjamin Webster represented real estate broker Laurel Lee Buescher in her suit against Vero Beach, Florida, lawyer Aaron Johnson and the Collins Brown Barkett Chartered law firm in Brevard Circuit Court. On Aug. 23, a jury returned a $1.79 million award, according to the verdict sheet in the case, finding that Johnson and the firm were negligent in their representation of Buescher and caused her to lose a case that she otherwise would have prevailed in.
According to an amended complaint, Buescher retained Collins Brown in 2007 in order to pursue a commission she hadn't been properly compensated for. Buescher contended she was only partially paid after procuring the buyer for an 1,800-acre commercial Palm Bay, Florida, property. After his firm was hired, Johnson allegedly waited until May 2009, the period when the four-year statute of limitations on Buescher's claim was due to expire, to enter a complaint on his client's behalf. Instead of Buescher, the suit purportedly listed Sun N Sea Real Estate P.A. as the named plaintiff.
Unfortunately the business did not exist at the time of the alleged transgression, prompting the suit's respondent to challenge the legal action for lack of standing. Following the error, Johnson and the firm withdrew as Buescher's legal counsel. Because the statute of limitations had ran out, Buescher was unable to move forward with her claim.
Webster said the deal Buescher initially pursued legal action over had been worth $50 million. The attorney added the defendants' failure to communicate that clerical errors had occurred left Buescher without a means to pursue the proceeds she felt were rightfully hers.
Read the complaint:
"It was basically DOA when it was filed," Webster said of the complaint, which prompted his client's legal malpractice suit.
Webster said the Aug. 23 verdict against Johnson and the firm was reached after the jury determined Buescher was entitled to a 4% commission on the closing at the heart of the litigation.
"We held him accountable for destroying her chances of ever being able to recover that commission," the attorney said.
Neither Johnson nor the firm provided a comment on the verdict by press time. A defense motion for summary judgment argued that the case should have been tossed because Buescher could not prove that she would have prevailed in the suit were it not for her former counsel's alleged errors.
Webster said his client was "elated and relieved" following last week's verdict.
"She's been chasing this commission she was owed for literally 15 years," he said. "She didn't want to give up on it because it was something she earned. So to finally have a jury rule on it … affirmed that the conduct of the defendants was the reason that she was not able to get the commission before."
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250