US Judge Sanctions Miami ADA Lawyer, Client Over 'Completely Selfish' Frivolous Lawsuits
U.S. District Judge Paul C. Huck in the Southern District of Florida found that Miami attorney Scott Dinin shared attorney fees with Alexander Johnson, a Broward man with a hearing impairment who's filed dozens of lawsuits against companies in Miami and Broward.
August 27, 2019 at 05:29 PM
4 minute read
U.S. District Judge Paul C. Huck has sanctioned Miami attorney Scott Dinin for filing frivolous lawsuits on behalf of his client, Alexander Johnson, a Broward County man who suffers from hearing loss and has sued more than 100 companies under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
The law was enacted more than two decades ago to bar discrimination against disabled persons, but Huck found the pair harbored "completely selfish" motives.
Huck wrote that lawsuits filed by Dinin for Johnson served "to dishonestly line their pockets with attorney's fees from hapless defendants under the sanctimonious guise of serving the interests of the disabled community."
Dinin has undermined the credibility of legitimate ADA cases by improperly sharing attorney fees with Johnson, "egregiously inflated" his billable time and exaggerated his legal experience, according to Huck's order, which said they have accepted blame. But Huck wasn't convinced.
"In an obvious attempt to minimize potential sanctions, Johnson and Dinin proposed that their transgressions, while serious, were merely the result of Dinin's inexperience, lack of legal sophistication, incompetence, and of Johnson's reliance on the advice of his attorney, rather than intentional malfeasance," Huck wrote.
The order blocks Dinin and Johnson from filing cases in any state or federal court in the country without written permission from the Southern District of Florida. Dinin will have to file this order in each case he's filed in the Southern District of Florida in the last 24 months, and he's been referred for investigation by the Florida Bar and the court's Ad Hoc Committee on Attorney Admissions, Peer Review and Attorney Grievance.
|'I apologize to those I have disappointed'
Dinin said he respects the ruling and the opportunity it provides for him to "address professionalism and then return to serving the justice needs of people with disabilities."
In an emailed statement, Dinin said, "My intention has been to address a very critical need of nearly one million deaf people of the state of Florida who demand to be treated with respect, accommodation and equality just like the rest of us. I have made serious mistakes which I acknowledge and for which I accept responsibility. I have changed my behavior. I apologize to those I have disappointed.
"I hope that my inadequacies do not get in the way of the message that people with disabilities have rights which must be enforced. Their independence and self-expression deserve to be supported and promoted. These cases were about ensuring deaf and hard of hearing people were not left behind in the rush for business to employ[] technologies that only part of the population case use."
Dinin billed $400 an hour for more than six hours of drafting, reviewing and filing documents that Huck said were identical to what he'd filed in other ADA cases. According to the order, the court unearthed documents and checks that show Dinin usually splits his fees 50/50 with Johnson.
Huck's findings stemmed from lawsuits Dinin brought against Miami gas stations owned by Ocaris Group Management Inc. and 27th Avenue Caraf Inc. over their failure to include closed captioning on the TV screens next to gas pumps.
Huck dismissed the cases with prejudice, as Dinin filed the lawsuit before exhausting all other options. They were two out of 26 identical cases against gas stations in Miami and Broward, according to the court order.
Huck said the sanctions aren't related to the dozens of similar ADA cases Johnson and Dinin have filed, but noted "it is not an illogical leap to conclude that these same abuses occurred in some or all of those cases."
The order also cited a Daily Business Review article, which raised questions about potential abuses in ADA litigation.
One of Dinin's cases became a landmark win against Winn Dixie Stores Inc., which paved the way for countless website accessibility lawsuits. But Huck found that transcripts revealed he "did not utter a single word during the two-day bench trial."
The court ordered Dinin and Johnson to give back fees and costs from both gas pump cases and pay a $59,000 penalty, either to the clerk of the court or the Disability Independence Group, a Miami nonprofit aimed at protecting the rights of disabled people.
|Read the court order
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRogge Dunn Represents Florida Trucking Firm in Civil RICO Suit Against Worldwide Express
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250