US Judge Sanctions Miami ADA Lawyer, Client Over 'Completely Selfish' Frivolous Lawsuits
U.S. District Judge Paul C. Huck in the Southern District of Florida found that Miami attorney Scott Dinin shared attorney fees with Alexander Johnson, a Broward man with a hearing impairment who's filed dozens of lawsuits against companies in Miami and Broward.
August 27, 2019 at 05:29 PM
4 minute read
U.S. District Judge Paul C. Huck has sanctioned Miami attorney Scott Dinin for filing frivolous lawsuits on behalf of his client, Alexander Johnson, a Broward County man who suffers from hearing loss and has sued more than 100 companies under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
The law was enacted more than two decades ago to bar discrimination against disabled persons, but Huck found the pair harbored "completely selfish" motives.
Huck wrote that lawsuits filed by Dinin for Johnson served "to dishonestly line their pockets with attorney's fees from hapless defendants under the sanctimonious guise of serving the interests of the disabled community."
Dinin has undermined the credibility of legitimate ADA cases by improperly sharing attorney fees with Johnson, "egregiously inflated" his billable time and exaggerated his legal experience, according to Huck's order, which said they have accepted blame. But Huck wasn't convinced.
"In an obvious attempt to minimize potential sanctions, Johnson and Dinin proposed that their transgressions, while serious, were merely the result of Dinin's inexperience, lack of legal sophistication, incompetence, and of Johnson's reliance on the advice of his attorney, rather than intentional malfeasance," Huck wrote.
The order blocks Dinin and Johnson from filing cases in any state or federal court in the country without written permission from the Southern District of Florida. Dinin will have to file this order in each case he's filed in the Southern District of Florida in the last 24 months, and he's been referred for investigation by the Florida Bar and the court's Ad Hoc Committee on Attorney Admissions, Peer Review and Attorney Grievance.
'I apologize to those I have disappointed'
Dinin said he respects the ruling and the opportunity it provides for him to "address professionalism and then return to serving the justice needs of people with disabilities."
In an emailed statement, Dinin said, "My intention has been to address a very critical need of nearly one million deaf people of the state of Florida who demand to be treated with respect, accommodation and equality just like the rest of us. I have made serious mistakes which I acknowledge and for which I accept responsibility. I have changed my behavior. I apologize to those I have disappointed.
"I hope that my inadequacies do not get in the way of the message that people with disabilities have rights which must be enforced. Their independence and self-expression deserve to be supported and promoted. These cases were about ensuring deaf and hard of hearing people were not left behind in the rush for business to employ[] technologies that only part of the population case use."
Dinin billed $400 an hour for more than six hours of drafting, reviewing and filing documents that Huck said were identical to what he'd filed in other ADA cases. According to the order, the court unearthed documents and checks that show Dinin usually splits his fees 50/50 with Johnson.
Huck's findings stemmed from lawsuits Dinin brought against Miami gas stations owned by Ocaris Group Management Inc. and 27th Avenue Caraf Inc. over their failure to include closed captioning on the TV screens next to gas pumps.
Huck dismissed the cases with prejudice, as Dinin filed the lawsuit before exhausting all other options. They were two out of 26 identical cases against gas stations in Miami and Broward, according to the court order.
Huck said the sanctions aren't related to the dozens of similar ADA cases Johnson and Dinin have filed, but noted "it is not an illogical leap to conclude that these same abuses occurred in some or all of those cases."
The order also cited a Daily Business Review article, which raised questions about potential abuses in ADA litigation.
One of Dinin's cases became a landmark win against Winn Dixie Stores Inc., which paved the way for countless website accessibility lawsuits. But Huck found that transcripts revealed he "did not utter a single word during the two-day bench trial."
The court ordered Dinin and Johnson to give back fees and costs from both gas pump cases and pay a $59,000 penalty, either to the clerk of the court or the Disability Independence Group, a Miami nonprofit aimed at protecting the rights of disabled people.
Read the court order
Read more:
Florida's Serial ADA Lawsuits: Long Overdue or 'Legal Extortion'?
Closed Captioning on Gas Pump TVs — the New Frontier of Florida's ADA Suits?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTragedy on I-95: Florida Lawsuit Against Horizon Freight System Could Set New Precedent in Crash Cases
2 minute read'You Lied to the Jury': Veteran Awarded $5 Million in Defamation Case Against CNN
4 minute readVedder Price Shareholder Javier Lopez Appointed to Miami Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Supreme Court Considers Reviving Lawsuit Over Fatal Traffic Stop Shooting
- 2Long Hours and Lack Of Boundaries: Associates In India Are Leaving Their Firms
- 3Goodwin Procter Relocates to Renewable-Powered Office in San Francisco’s Financial District
- 4'Didn't Notice Patient Wasn't Breathing': $13.7M Verdict Against Anesthesiologists
- 5'Astronomical' Interest Rates: $1B Settlement to Resolve Allegations of 'Predatory' Lending Cancels $534M in Small-Business Debts
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250