Florida AG Seeks to Scuttle Fight Over Hospital Money
Larkin Community Hospital and Larkin Community Hospital Palm Springs Campus are challenging the constitutionality of budget language that would prevent the facilities from receiving Medicaid money used for training physicians.
August 28, 2019 at 01:31 PM
4 minute read
Attorney General Ashley Moody's office wants a judge to toss out a lawsuit challenging a legislative decision that would strip Medicaid money from two South Florida hospitals with ownership ties to a nursing home where residents died after Hurricane Irma.
Moody's office, representing Agency for Health Care Administration Secretary Mary Mayhew, filed a 32-page document last week arguing that a Leon County circuit judge should dismiss the lawsuit by Larkin Community Hospital and Larkin Community Hospital Palm Springs Campus, both in Miami-Dade County.
The hospitals are challenging the constitutionality of fine print, known as "proviso" language, that was tucked into this year's state budget and would prevent the facilities from receiving Medicaid money used for training physicians. The budget fine print bars graduation-medical education money from going to hospitals "owned or operated by a controlling interest" that has had a nursing-home license revoked since Jan. 1, 2017.
The state says the hospitals are under the controlling interest of Jack J. Michel, who also has a controlling interest in The Rehabilitation Center at Hollywood Hills, a nursing home where residents died after Hurricane Irma knocked out its air-conditioning system in September 2017.
In part, the hospitals contend that the budget proviso is unconstitutional because it revamps broader state laws about who is qualified to receive graduate-medical education money, criteria for the funding and how it is distributed. But in the document filed last week, Moody's office argued that purposes of the graduate-medical education programs include improving quality of care for Medicaid patients and increasing the supply of highly trained physicians.
"A proviso that withholds appropriation from hospitals that have a direct connection, through a common controlling interest, to a nursing home that has been found to have intentionally or negligently harmed a resident can be considered directly and rationally related to improving the quality of care of Medicaid recipients," the motion to dismiss the case said.
The lawsuit, which was filed in June and names Mayhew and Secretary of State Laurel Lee as defendants, also argues that the budget fine print is an unconstitutional "special" law because it improperly singles out the Larkin hospitals.
"The challenged proviso language was adopted to specifically target the Larkin hospitals, which operate their teaching hospital facilities in only one county in the state," the lawsuit said. "Laws targeting and designed to operate upon … specific entities, providers or business owners that operate in a single county are special laws."
But the state, in the filling last week, disputed that, saying the budget language applies to hospitals statewide and would block the physician-training money for "any such hospital fitting the proviso's defined parameters."
The lawsuit, which has been assigned to Leon County Circuit Judge Angela Dempsey, said the Larkin hospitals have received millions of dollars in recent years through graduate-medical education programs, including a combined $4.27 million in 2018.
But the ownership interests of Michel in the hospitals became an issue after The Rehabilitation Center at Hollywood Hills drew national attention in 2017 when patients were evacuated from the sweltering nursing home days after Hurricane Irma pounded the state.
The Agency for Health Care Administration in January issued a final order revoking the nursing home's license, following a recommended order last year by an administrative law judge. The nursing home is closed, but AHCA's final order is being appealed.
Authorities attributed as many as 12 deaths to conditions at the facility, though Administrative Law Judge Mary Li Creasy wrote that "clear and convincing evidence" was presented during the case that nine of the 12 residents "suffered greatly from the exposure to unsafe heat in the facility."
The nursing home drew additional attention this week when four employees were charged with felonies in the patient deaths.
Jim Saunders reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFla.'s Statute of Limitations and Statutes of Repose in Med Mal Cases: It's Not Over Until It's Over
6 minute readGC of Florida State Agency Steps Down After Threatening TV Stations That Aired Abortion-Rights Ad
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250