Florida Appeals Court Greenlights Arbitration in Dispute Over Colombian Craft Beer
The Third District Court of Appeal reversed an order of the Miami-Dade Circuit Court that prevented Ancla International from pursuing an arbitration claim against a Panama-based investment group.
August 28, 2019 at 03:57 PM
4 minute read
A Florida appellate court has ruled in favor of a Colombian beer business pursuing an arbitration claim potentially worth hundreds of millions of dollars against a past potential investor.
The Third District Court of Appeal reversed an order of the Miami-Dade Circuit Court that prevented Ancla International SA from pursuing an arbitration claim against the Panama-based investment group Tribeca Asset Management Inc. The appeals court then remanded the case back to the circuit court.
Ancla, which specializes in craft beer, commenced the underlying litigation with a complaint against Tribeca in Miami-Dade Circuit Court. The November 2015 suit sought to compel arbitration after the defendant, a Panamanian investment company, abandoned talks of a possible partnership between the two companies. According to an April 2016 press release from Ancla, Tribeca purportedly lied regarding their reasons for discontinuing the discussions and subsequently invested heavily in Bogota Beer Co., one of Ancla's competitors.
Ancla's release also contended the arbitration claim stood to be worth $500 million.
The petition to compel arbitration alleged Ancla had shared trade secrets with Tribeca over the course of their negotiations, leaving room for the group to utilize this information against the company in its newfound partnership with Bogota Beer Co. Ancla cited a clause of their January 2012 confidentiality agreement with Tribeca, which held the contract would be "governed by the laws of the State of Florida … a jurisdiction accepted by the parties irrespective of the fact that the principal activity of the beer project will be conducted in Colombia."
Read the opinion:
The same stipulation also said any intractable disagreements between the parties "will be submitted to an Arbitration Board, whose ruling with carry the force of law."
The lower court granted Tribeca's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, prompting Ancla's appeal to the Third DCA. The appellate panel disagreed with the trial court's interpretation of "jurisdiction" in the contract as a provision outlining the parties' choice of law. The appeals court wrote "the plain and ordinary meaning of the disputed language" of the agreement delineated authority to Florida courts to weigh in on disputes between the parties.
"The parties agreed to be bound by Florida law and be subject to the jurisdiction of Florida courts," the opinion said, adding court saw "no reason to read this language any other way."
Ancla's appellate attorney, Coral Gables solo practitioner Carlos Sardi, said his client's interpretation of the contract was "vindicated" by the Third DCA's ruling.
"Florida law not only applied, but Florida courts should be the ones deciding any disputes as to the enforcement of the agreement," he said.
Holland & Knight attorneys Adolfo Jimenez, Rebecca Plasencia, and Vanessa Lopez served as Tribeca's legal counsel. Jimenez said his client was disappointed by the Third DCA's reversal and noted the original contract was drafted in Spanish.
"There was never a waiver of personal jurisdiction," the Holland & Knight partner said. "The relevant language in plaintiff's contract was limited to the application of Florida law and it did not confer jurisdiction to Florida courts. The applicable law provision was merely noting that the transaction at issue had no relationship to Florida."
Sardi said his client is "ecstatic" and excited for the case to proceed in arbitration.
"The only thing to be determined by the trial court is which arbitration organization or forum we would need to resort to in order for the parties to resolve their dispute," he said. "We've been waiting for quite a while, but thank goodness it came out the right way."
Related stories:
Branded Malt Beverage Glassware—Florida Distributors, Take Note!
Will Protectionist Alcohol Rules Withstand More Supreme Court Scrutiny?
Miami Lawyers in Bacardi, Bombay Sapphire Class Action Over Prohibited Ingredient
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How the Court of Public Opinion Should Factor Into Litigation Strategy
- 2Debevoise Lures Another SDNY Alum, Adding Criminal Division Chief
- 3Cooley Promotes NY Office Leader to Global Litigation Department Chair
- 4What Happens When Lateral Partners’ Guaranteed Compensation Ends?
- 5Tuesday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250