How Miami Lawyers Swerved Yamaha Away From $15M Products Liability Suit
A WaveRunner personal watercraft sat at the heart of this products liability lawsuit against Yamaha Motor Corp. USA, so its defense team wheeled it into the courtroom, allowing jurors to sit on it during deliberations.
September 02, 2019 at 09:00 AM
6 minute read
A team of Miami lawyers steered Yamaha Motor Corp. USA and its Japanese parent company away from claims that insufficient warnings on its WaveRunner watercraft contributed to the injuries of a teenage rider who fell off in Biscayne Bay.
Plaintiffs attorneys asked the jury for between $13 million and $15 million in damages, but they found Yamaha owed nothing.
WaveRunners are personal watercraft, similar in appearance to jet skis, that can seat up to three people. 16-year-old Dariana Mizrahi was riding with friends in January 2017 when she slipped off the back and into the water.
The fall exposed her to a high-pressure water jet system, which pushes out water to propel the watercraft forward. That damaged Mizrahi's rectum and internal organs, according to the lawsuit, which said she had to have multiple surgeries, a temporary colostomy bag and was hospitalized for complications.
Mizrahi's father sued on her behalf for negligence and strict liability, claiming Yamaha's warnings weren't sufficient. Defense attorneys Richard Mueller and Heather Counts of Thompson Coburn and Scott Sarason and Michael Holt of Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell begged to differ, arguing the watercraft, owners manual and other documents featured clear warnings.
"There's a warning on the craft that says that this is a possibility," Mueller said. "That, if you fall into the water at speed, you can receive this kind of water intrusion injury, and that you should wear wetsuit bottoms or clothing that essentially provides the same kind of protection as that."
Mizrahi described herself as an expert operator of personal watercraft and owned a wetsuit, but she was wearing Nike Dri-FIT shorts when she fell off. The plaintiffs argued they were similar to a wetsuit, but Sarason says there's no comparison.
"The Dri-FIT, you can hold it up to the light and see the light coming through it," Sarason said. "The wetsuit is a thick, heavier material and it has been tested and proven to prevent this type of injury from occurring."
One plaintiffs expert posited that even a wetsuit wouldn't have protected Mizrahi from an orifice injury, but defense lawyer Counts argued there was no evidence to support that claim. U.S. District Judge Robert Scola agreed, granting a partial directed verdict on the issue.
|A uniform warning
The plaintiff testified that she had read Yamaha's warning, which is the same one all personal watercraft manufacturers have used for 15 years, according to Mueller, because the U.S. Coast Guard's Boating Safety Advisory Council made it mandatory.
"Our first response was, to the extent you're criticizing the warning, every safety organization that's ever looked at it has approved of this warning, including the state of Florida, which includes it in their boating safety course," Mueller said.
Defense experts explained the history of personal watercraft and testified about what makes a warning label good or bad. One expert, Nathan Dorris in Atlanta, has chaired the American National Standards Institute, which develops consensus standards for warnings and safety communications.
Miami attorneys Curtis Miner, Denise Georges and Stephanie Casey of Colson Hicks Edison handled Mizrahi's case with solo practitioner Albert Levin in Miami and are weighing their options for appeal. Miner said his client is recovering but will have permanent problems with her digestion.
"A loss at trial is always tough, but it was particularly tough for our team in this case because we really felt sympathy for our client and she will be left with lifelong consequences from the serious injuries she sustained, unfortunately," Miner said.
The defense team couldn't tell the jury, but they had two similar wins under their belt. Yamaha has warded off two lawsuits challenging its uniform warning label, both of which we were affirmed on appeal. Defense attorney Mueller said he was sympathetic to Mizrahi's injuries, but he felt the facts of the case ran against her.
"I think that [Yamaha] feels as though they make good products, and that these injuries are very rare but that they won't occur to people who comply with the warnings," Mueller said. "And if people won't comply with the warnings, it seems like that's more kind of on them than it is on the product."
|Show and tell
Mueller, Counts, Sarason and Holt took the unusual step of bringing in the same WaveRunner model Mizrahi rode to show jurors. During deliberations, jurors could sit on it, hold it, turn the handlebars and do whatever else they wanted to, according to Mueller.
"We cut out the bottom, pulled out the engine and all those flammable things to it, and we put it on rollers and we brought it into the courtroom," Mueller said. "I think it helped the jury in terms of where the warnings were, and how visible they were and how obvious it was."
Jurors took just three hours to deliberate, which Mueller said included a lunch break.
Injuries like Mizrahi's are a rare event, experienced by one or two people in the U.S. a year, according to Mueller, who said that's not much considering how many people use water skis and personal watercraft every day.
"If you've got a million craft out there, and even if they're just being operated 50 hours a year, that's 50 million use hours," Mueller said. "If you just get one incident a year, you're safer than flying on a plane."
|Read the jury verdict:
|Case: Dariana Mizrahi v. Yamaha Motor Corp. USA and Yamaha Motor Co.
Case no.: 1:17-cv-24484-RNS
Description: Personal injury, products liability
Filing date: Dec. 12, 2017
Verdict date: July 29, 2019
Judge: U.S. District Judge Robert M. Scola in the Southern District of Florida
Plaintiffs attorneys: Curtis Miner, Denise Georges and Stephanie Casey, Colson Hicks Edison, Miami; Albert Levin, Albert Z. Levin P.A., Miami
Defense attorneys: Richard Mueller and Heather Counts, Thompson Coburn, St. Louis, Missouri; Scott Sarason and Michael Holt, Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, Miami
Verdict amount: Defense verdict
More verdicts:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Tampa Jury Returns $5.8M Verdict Against Insurer Who Denied Coverage
2 minute readEven the Chief Judge Noted the Cost of This Broward Case
Marriott's $52M Data Breach Settlement Points to Emerging Trend
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250