Elite Division I Football Benefits Student Housing Landlords
Student housing in cities with top Division I football programs command higher prices and lower cap rates, a CBRE analysis shows.
September 03, 2019 at 10:00 AM
3 minute read
Investors in the market for student housing properties would do well to study the college football scores: research from CBRE Inc. finds student housing properties serving universities with elite football programs command higher prices and lower cap rates compared with student housing near other universities.
The analysis finds that advantage spreading beyond the Power 5 schools this year.
Cap rates for student housing assets near top football schools are considerably lower than student housing at other universities with the pricing differential 40+ basis points in the first half of the year, CBRE reports.
At the NCAA's Division I Power 5 universities covering the top football conferences (Atlantic Coast, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12 and Southeastern), student housing acquisitions in the first half of the year had an average 5.40% cap rate, or 43 basis points below non-Division I schools.
They captured a disproportionate share — nearly half of all transactions — of the total investment volume for the first half of the year.
Similarly, cap rates for student housing assets at Division I non-Power 5 universities averaged 5.43% in the first half of 2019, also well below the 5.83% average for non-Division I universities, CBRE said.
The reasons is simple: Football is a very effective marketing tool for universities and creates value for student housing properties, CBRE noted.
"The strong football programs in Division I schools, and particularly in the Power 5 conferences, create national recognition and prestige," the report said. "In turn, these 'football schools' recruit more students, ensuring stable to rising enrollments."
Not surprisingly this in turn gives investors confidence in the performance of student housing assets at these schools.
Beyond the Power 5
This year, the football advantage is spreading beyond Power 5 universities, CBRE noted.
In previous surveys, cap rates for student housing assets linked to Power 5 universities had lower cap rates than other Division I schools, but this year pricing has been almost the same.
"Many non-Power 5 Division I universities have football programs gaining significant national attention along with rapidly growing enrollments," CBRE said. "Schools such as the University of Central Florida, University of South Florida, University of Cincinnati, University of Houston, Boise State, University of Memphis and San Diego State are prime examples."
Higher yield and expanded investment opportunities also drive capital to many non-Power 5 Division I schools. CBRE reported cap rates for student housing beyond to top football schools tightened the most among the three major categories, falling 27 basis points from 2018's average.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250