Fla. Approves Plan for Hemp Production Despite FDA Constraints on CBD
Florida is a step closer to permitting hemp production, with Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signing into law legislation set forth in Florida Statutes Section 581.217, establishing a state hemp program within the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS).
September 03, 2019 at 09:19 AM
6 minute read
Florida is a step closer to permitting hemp production, with Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signing into law legislation set forth in Florida Statutes Section 581.217, establishing a state hemp program within the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS). The law tasks the FDACS with developing regulations for administering the state's hemp program, including regulations for licensing, cultivation, and distribution of hemp and its constituent parts, which include cannabidiol (CBD), and submitting the state's plan to the U.S. Secretary of Agriculture for approval. The law took effect July 1.
Florida's new state hemp plan comes on the heels—and as a direct result—of passage of the Federal Agricultural Improvement Act of 2018, signed into law by President Donald Trump on Dec. 22, 2018. Commonly referred to as the Farm Bill, the legislation took important steps to remove a number of federal prohibitions that had stymied the U.S. hemp industry for decades. For example, the Farm Bill expanded the definition of hemp to include any part or derivative of the cannabis plant with 0.3% or less THC; removed most forms of hemp from the Controlled Substances Act; tasked the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) with establishing benchmark federal regulations governing the licensing, cultivation, and distribution of hemp; and, importantly, permits the states to submit state-sponsored hemp programs to the USDA and apply for primary regulatory authority over the production of hemp in their jurisdictions.
Florida's newly enacted hemp program therefore constitutes the state's plan for regulation of hemp and its derivative products as contemplated by the Farm Bill. The new law mandates that the FDACS—within 30 days of the USDA's enactment of not-yet-announced federal regulations—submit the state's hemp plan to the U.S. Secretary of Agriculture for approval. Should Florida's hemp plan not be approved by the USDA, the law directs FDACS to develop a recommendation to amend the plan for ultimate approval and re-submission. In addition, the law establishes licensure requirements for growers and a structure to ensure the purity, labeling, and quality compliance of cultivated hemp products for the protection of Florida consumers. The law also establishes a 15-member state advisory council to assist FDACS with development of policies and procedures related to hemp cultivation in the state.
Despite Florida's new hemp law, significant challenges remain for companies and individuals seeking to sell CBD-containing foods and beverages in Florida. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) continues to exercise regulatory authority over the addition of hemp and its derivatives, including CBD, to conventional foods, beverages, dietary supplements, cosmetics and other products introduced in interstate commerce and within the ambit of FDA's jurisdiction. FDA's authority is provided by the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), which prohibits the adulteration or misbranding of such products. The FDA currently takes the position that CBD and other cannabinoids are impermissible additives that cause food and dietary supplements to be adulterated under the FDCA. The FDA has been less clear as to whether it views CBD as an acceptable cosmetic ingredient.
After the Farm Bill was signed into law in December 2018, then-FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb issued a statement recognizing the enormous public interest in hemp and CBD, but cautioned that, despite passage of the bill, "it's unlawful under the FDCA to introduce food containing added CBD or THC into interstate commerce, or to market CBD or THC products as, or in, dietary supplements, regardless of whether the substances are hemp-derived." Gottlieb did, however, conclude that pathways remain available for the FDA to consider whether there are circumstances in which certain cannabis-derived compounds, primarily CBD, might be permitted in a food or dietary supplement. Gottlieb stated that "although such products are generally prohibited to be introduced in interstate commerce, the FDA has authority to issue a regulation allowing the use … in a food or dietary supplement" and that the FDA is "taking new steps to evaluate whether [FDA] should pursue such a process."
More recently, on July 12, FDA Principal Deputy Commissioner Amy Abernathy, formally announced that the FDA plans to expedite the development of regulations specific to CBD, with the intent of issuing a progress report by the end of summer or early fall 2019. Abernathy's announcement comes on the heels of increased bipartisan pressure from Congress on the FDA to act expeditiously in developing sound regulations governing the sale, distribution and use of CBD at the federal level, particularly with respect to CBD as a food additive and dietary ingredient. To be sure, on June 25, Sen. Ron Wyden issued a letter to the FDA urging the agency to issue formal guidance announcing a CBD enforcement discretion policy no later than Aug, 1. Wyden further urged the FDA, pending publication of a permanent final rule, to issue an interim final rule ensuring that a regulatory pathway exists for the lawful use of CBD as a food additive and as a dietary ingredient. Across the aisle, on June 27, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell met with Acting FDA Commissioner Ned Sharpless and similarly urged him to develop regulations so that hemp-derived CBD can be lawfully marketed in the United States. Following the meeting, McConnell issued a public statement reaffirming that "Congress' intent was clear from the passage of the Farm Bill that these products [CBD foods and dietary ingredients] should be legal, and our farmers, producers and manufacturers need clarity as well as a workable pathway forward regarding the agency's enforcement."
While federal law governing the production, sale, distribution, and use of CBD-containing foods, beverages, and dietary supplements remains in a haze, Florida's hemp plan will hopefully provide clarity at the state level to Florida businesses with respect to the licensing, cultivation, and distribution of hemp as an agricultural commodity and with respect to the sale, distribution, and use of hemp-derived products, in particular to the use of such products not directly intended for use as foods or beverages.
Kyle Diamantas is an associate in the Orlando office of Baker Donelson. He focuses his practice on civil litigation and regulatory compliance, with an emphasis on United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and state equivalent regulatory and compliance issues and disputes. He can be reached at [email protected].
Samuel L. Felker, managing shareholder in the firm's Fort Lauderdale office, is a member of the Firm's Product Liability and Mass Tort Group and practices a wide variety of civil litigation. He can be reached at [email protected].
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
4 minute readData Breaches, Increased Regulatory Risk and Florida’s New Digital Bill of Rights
7 minute readNavigating Florida's Products Liability Law: Defective Products, Warnings and the Pursuit of Justice
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250