Midlevel Law Firm Associates Are Happier in Miami Than National Average
McDermott Will & Emery comes out on top in the Miami rankings.
September 04, 2019 at 08:00 AM
4 minute read
It looks like Miami is the place to be for midlevel law firm associates compared to their Am Law 200 cohorts elsewhere in the country based on annual ALM survey results.
The Miami associates at four of the five firms that met the response threshold gave higher satisfaction rankings than associates in its other offices.
McDermott Will & Emery led the way, and the upbeat feel was palpable on a short walk through the office — even when Miami managing partner Jerry Sokol was quizzing everyone from veteran partners to newcomers and putting them on the spot about how they felt about working for the firm.
"It's as important to us that people are happy and we have a good culture as that we're profitable and are indispensable to our clients," Sokol said. "When you're practicing law at the level of a big international firm, the work is going to be complex and difficult, and the clients can be very tough. The only thing we can control completely is our culture and how we treat each other."
An ability to operate in a supportive, collegial and collaborative environment factors into hiring decisions, he said. In pursuit of a positive culture, McDermott Monthly events are set in the late afternoon once a month for all attorneys and staff. September will be a karaoke show.
Carlton Fields ranked higher than McDermott Will nationally but placed second in Florida.
"These rankings are gratifying given that they reflect the views of our associates who are vital to the long-term success of our firm. Our associates bring creativity, energy and intelligence to the firm, and we are pleased to be recognized for our commitment to their professional and personal fulfillment," Naila Townes Ahmed, director of legal talent management at Carlton Fields, said in a statement.
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius placed third in Miami and above the national average. Below average rankings were delivered in Miami for Holland & Knight and White & Case.
The survey asked third-, fourth- and fifth-year associates to rate job satisfaction at their firms based on compensation and benefits, training and guidance, relations with partners and other associates, interest in and satisfaction level with the work, billable hours policy and management's openness about firm strategies and partnership chances.
Workplaces were graded on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest score. Firms with 10 or more responses nationally were ranked by average scores on these questions. The average composite satisfaction score for all 96 participating law firms was 4.29, up from 4.27 last year.
Miami firms were counted if at least five responses were received. Greenberg Traurig ranked below the other five firms nationally but did not have enough responses in Miami to be listed for the city.
Overall, associate satisfaction grew in nearly every category, reflecting well on retention. The greatest improvement in average score was in the "expect to stay two years" category, rising to 4.18 from 4.12 last year.
Midlevel associates also are happier on average about the type of work they do and their training. The average score for "interesting work" was 4.51, up from 4.47 last year, and the average for "satisfying work" was 4.39, up from 4.37.
Scores for "training and guidance" and "partner relations" increased by similar margins to 4.24 and 4.45, respectively.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida Supreme Court Paves Way for Attorney Fees Over $100k in Land Dispute
Miami’s Arbitration Week Aims To Cement City’s Status as Dispute Destination
3 minute readAnticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250