The Importance of Staying Up to Date With BSA/AML Requirements
Since its inception, the BSA remains the primary U.S. anti-money laundering (AML) law, but it has been amended, updated, and refined, particularly since the 9-11 attacks, to help law enforcement to better detect, deter and disrupt the financing of terrorist networks.
September 05, 2019 at 09:26 AM
4 minute read
In 1970, Congress passed the Bank Secrecy Act. At the time, the BSA was the first legislation created to specifically fight money laundering in the United States. The BSA requires businesses to keep records and file reports that are determined to have a high degree of usefulness in criminal, tax and regulatory matters.
Since its inception, the BSA remains the primary U.S. anti-money laundering, or AML, law, but it has been amended, updated, and refined, particularly since the 9-11 attacks, to help law enforcement to better detect, deter and disrupt the financing of terrorist networks.
Today, this crucial regulation requires every national bank and savings association to have a written, board-approved program that is reasonably designed to assure and monitor compliance with the BSA.
The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network has been working diligently to improve BSA/AML to not only more effectively combat terrorism, but also, to make it easier for financial institutions to comply with the regulations.
As new regulations are updated, it can make it difficult for many financial institutions to keep up with the changes and modify their BSA/AML programs accordingly. Yet it is incumbent upon them to do so, particularly here in the Miami area, which has been recognized as a hotbed of international money laundering activities.
For many years, South Florida has been on the list of high intensity financial crime areas as well as the list of the high intensity drug trafficking areas.
It is critical for banks and other financial institutions in the Miami area to evaluate domestic risk appropriately and be able to apply the appropriate risk mitigation. This is the goal of some of the latest modifications to BSA — developing an approach that is based more on a particular organization's level of risk, instead of a more blanket approach for all institutions.
|Improved Approach to BSA/AML
According to the recent joint statement issued by FINCEN on July 22, "The extent of examination activities necessary to evaluate a bank's BSA/AML compliance program generally depends on a bank's risk profile and the quality of its risk management processes to identify, measure, monitor, and control risks, and to report potential money laundering, terrorist financing, and other illicit financial activity. A bank's well-developed risk assessment is a critical part of sound risk management that will not only assist regulator to in conducting their examination but also financial institution to allocate efforts in those riskier areas."
That same joint statement also said that taking a more risk-focused approach to BSA/AML enables federal agencies to better tailor examination plans and procedures based on the unique risk profile of each bank.
The risk-focused approach has been designed to allow the agencies to more effectively allocate resources by allotting more resources to higher-risk areas and fewer resources to lower-risk areas when conducting BSA/AML examinations.
|Why Are These New Rules So Important?
Updating the BSA rules and issuing these kinds of joint statements are so important because it shows how the agencies are open to engaging with financial institutions to improve communication, transparency and effectiveness of the AML program.
This is particularly important for our local community banks because they don't have the same resources as larger financial institutions. Understanding the risk profile of the bank enables a bank to allocate compliance resources commensurate with its risk.
Any error can result in a fine resulting in a huge reputational risk for the financial institution. Also, having the right technology and using artificial intelligence and machine learning to attack human traffickers, terrorist activities, and money launders can aid many financial institution to potentially bring efficiencies and effectiveness into the BSA/AML.
Financial institutions, specifically executive management, need to ensure that their employees have the appropriate tools, training, resources, information and technology necessary to continue to uphold the highest standards of compliance.
And that means financial institutions must stay abreast of all recent changes in the regulatory environment to not only aid in the "War on Terror," but to also minimize their organization's reputational risk.
Frank Gonzalez is a managing principal and Heidy Duarte is a director with accounting firm MBAF.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
4 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250