Boat Crew Stranded in Cuba May Pursue Claims Against Travelers
Six crew members claimed they survived by eating rats and insects for nearly a year, a Miami federal judge noted in his order.
September 11, 2019 at 10:37 AM
4 minute read
A federal judge in Miami refused to dismiss a lawsuit brought by foreign nationals against a commercial general liability insurance carrier that insured a cargo barge and tugboat that was stranded in Cuba for nearly a year.
While on its way to deliver cargo from Fort Pierce to Gonaives, Haiti, the tugboat Billy G, ran out of fuel near Cuba in June 2013. The Cuban coast guard towed the Billy G to Moa, Cuba, where the captain and five crew members — Eddie Bodden, Feliz Terrero, Francisco Ortega, Marcelino Susana, Victor Lacayo Lopez and Julio Bringuez — were simply stuck, some with untreated injuries.
"During that year they ate rats and insects in order to survive," U.S. District Judge Robert Scola wrote. After months without food, money or supplies, they were repatriated to their home countries.
The crew filed suit against Suncoast Shipping LLC in a Florida state court, alleging Suncoast's failure to repatriate them, failure to provide maintenance and cure, and failure to provide medical treatment; unseaworthiness; Jones Act negligence; and other claims. The lawsuit said Port St. Lucie-based Suncoast operated, controlled, managed and maintained the Billy G and its barge.
Suncoast's insurer, Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America, adjusted a small portion of the plaintiffs' claims and initially defended the state court action against Suncoast.
Ultimately, Travelers filed an action for declaratory relief against Suncoast, seeking to void the policy. Travelers did not name the crew as parties.
Scola entered a default judgment, voiding the policy on Suncoast's claims for the loss of the vessels.
Afterward, Travelers stopped defending the state court action and closed the plaintiffs' claims without further payment.
The state court entered final judgment against Suncoast and in favor of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs then filed a lawsuit to recover the judgment from Travelers.
They maintained the Travelers coverage provisions encompassed their injuries, illnesses, medical expenses, repatriation expenses, Jones Act compensation and other damages, and argued the judgment in their favor against Suncoast gave them standing to bring a direct action against Travelers.
In response, Travelers asked the district court to dismiss the crew members' complaint, saying the policy did not cover the plaintiffs under Florida's nonjoinder statute and the policy was voided by the default judgment entered against Suncoast in federal court.
The district court denied Travelers' motion and ordered the company to respond to the lawsuit by Sept. 16. Scola rejected Travelers' contention that the plaintiffs could not bring an action under Florida Statutes Section 627.4136 providing for lawsuits "under the terms of [a] liability contract" because its policy was a "policy of indemnity not liability."
The district court explained the Travelers policy provided it would "make good to [Suncoast] … all such loss and/or damage and/or expense as [Suncoast] shall as owners of the vessel named herein have become liable to pay and shall pay on account of liabilities, risks, events, and/or happenings" as set forth in the policy.
The decision noted the policy identified 14 categories of losses, injuries, expenses, damages, charges and penalties covered by the policy, including 11 specifically introduced as "liability for" the corresponding damage.
The district court ruled the policy was "one of protection against liability" and, therefore, the plaintiffs properly pleaded their right to bring a direct action under the state law.
The district court also rejected Travelers' argument that the declaratory judgment it obtained against Suncoast in federal court, determining the policy was void ab initio, barred the plaintiffs' claims. The district court noted the plaintiffs "were not parties in that case" and not bound by the judgment.
The district court concluded that if Travelers wanted to defeat the plaintiffs' rights under the policy with a declaratory judgment action, "it should have made them parties to that suit."
The case is Bodden v. Travelers Property Casualty, No. 1:18-cv-25095 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 6). Attorneys involved include: For the plaintiffs: Louis Anthony Vucci, Louis A. Vucci P.A., Miami, William Wolk, Eaton & Wolk, Miami. For Travelers, defendant: Michael Conroy, lead attorney, and Joanne Nachio, McAlpin & Conroy, Miami.
Read the decision:
Steven A. Meyerowitz, a Harvard Law School graduate, is the founder and president of Meyerowitz Communications Inc., a law firm marketing communications consulting company. Meyerowitz is the Director of the Insurance Coverage Law Center and editor-in-chief of journals on insurance law, banking law, bankruptcy law, energy law, government contracting law, and privacy and cybersecurity law, among other subjects. Contact him at smeyerowitz@
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBrazil Is Quickly Becoming a Vital LatAm Market for Greenberg Traurig, Other US Law Firms
5 minute read'Would've Been Snoring Without Ya': Fort Lauderdale Jury Awards $4.5 Million in Condo Investment Spat
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250