Meliá's Cuban Hotels Hit With Helms-Burton Class Action
White & Case partner and former Florida Supreme Court Justice Raoul Cantero is one of the nearly 40 plaintiffs who brought the suit.
September 11, 2019 at 01:57 PM
6 minute read
Spanish hotel chain Meliá Hotels International SA has been hit with a class-action suit—the most sweeping action so far under Title III of the Helms-Burton Act, which allows Americans to sue companies doing business in Cuba if they are profiting off of land expropriated after the 1959 Cuban revolution.
The suit, filed Wednesday by Coral Gables-based Rivero Mestre, lists nearly 40 plaintiffs among four families with the majority living in Miami-Dade County. White & Case partner and former Florida Supreme Court Justice Raoul Cantero is one of the plaintiffs.
As a class action, the suit targets all 34 of Meliá's Cuban hotels and alleges that the company is unlawfully "trafficking" in what was once their ancestors' properties, from a single hotel to an entire island. According to the statute, trafficking is defined as profiting from or engaging in commercial activity on the confiscated property.
By building or operating the hotels, the suit alleges, Meliá is trafficking in their properties and is thus subject to Helms-Burton litigation. The suit also names several United States travel booking agencies for playing a role in facilitating and profiting off reservations, including Expedia, Hotels.com, Orbitz, Travelocity.com, Trivago and Bookings.com.
Meliá operates more than 380 hotels across the world and is publicly traded with yearly revenue of $1.84 billion, according to MarketWatch. The hotelier's 34 Cuban hotels make it one of, if not the, largest foreign proprietor of Cuban hotels in the world.
The company did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
"We gave these companies the notices required in the statute to cease trafficking and they haven't stopped, so now we're going to ask the court to stop [them]," said Rivero Mestre partner Andres Rivero.
The specific claims listed in the complaint are lodged by four different Cuban American families — heirs to the founders of the hotels now operated by Meliá in conjunction with the Cuban government. Public-private partnership with the Cuban government is required for foreign investment into the country, and the suit also names the Cuban enterprises that are facilitating Meliá's operations.
Cantero, the White & Case partner, is joined by 27 other family members who are descendants of Juan Bautista Cantero and his wife Eugenia Herrera. The couple owned a seven-mile strip of land on Varadero Beach on the eastern coastline of Cuba before their land was confiscated by the Cuban government in the early 1960s.
Meliá and the Cuban government have in recent years developed nine hotels on the land, according to the complaint: Meliá Marina Varadero, Meliá Peninsula Varadero, Paradisus Princesa Del Mar Resort & Spa, Paradisus Varadero Resort & Spa, Meliá Marina Varadero Apartments, Meliá Las Americas, Meliá Varadero Hotel, Meliá Sol Palmeras, and Meliá Las Antillas.
Another set of plaintiffs — Marisela Mata and Bibiana Hernandez — are the descendants of Antonio Mata y Alvarez, who built the Hotel San Carlos in Cienfuegos, Cuba in 1928, according to the complaint. On Dec. 4, 1962, the Cuban government expropriated the hotel from Mata y Alvarez's son, Antonio Alberto Lazaro Mata. In January of 2018, the hotel reopened under the Meliá banner.
Antonio Alonzo Mata, the 33-year-old great-grandson of Antonio Mata y Alvarez, said he grew up hearing stories of his family's great wealth: dozens of properties, hundreds of bulls, a vibrant hotel. As the story goes, it was all taken away after the revolution, and the family was repeatedly taunted and humiliated by the military. In the 1990s, his family immigrated to Florida and Alonzo Mata was raised by his uncle and cousins.
"I would love to be able to get that respect back for my family. All I've heard from my mother is how much she's suffered from this," said Alonzo Mata, a firefighter. "It's important to us because it's our family's legacy."
The third family is represented by Jose Ramon López Regueiro, the descendant of José López Vilaboy, who according to the complaint co-owned a nearly 140-room hotel in Cienfuegos, Cuba, according to the complaint. It was confiscated in February 1960, the complaint says, and is now operated as Hotel Jugua, managed by Meliá.
The final set of plaintiffs represented in the case are the eight-member Angulo Cuevas family. Their ancestors owned the island of Cayo Coco off of the North coast of Cuba before their land was expropriated Aug. 16, 1960, and the family fled to the United States, the suit alleges. In the decades since, Meliá, in a joint venture with two Cuban companies, developed what is now the Cayo Coco Resorts, a chain of several resorts.
Because of so-called blocking statutes — laws passed in several countries, including Spain, that block Helms-Burton actions, the plaintiffs will most likely only be able to collect by targeting Meliá's assets in the U.S.
The hotel chain has a property in Orlando and New York, but it's unclear how much or what collection mechanism the plaintiffs have at their disposal if a court rules against Meliá.
Damages for Helms-Burton litigation are calculated by a formula: the greater of either fair market value of the property at the time of confiscation, plus interest, the current market value of the property or the "amount determined" as the value of the claim if it is certified by the U.S. Foreign Claims Settlement Commission (FCSC).
Defendants are further subject to treble damages, essentially triple the original amount, if they were put on specific notice of trafficking and did not cease within thirty days, or if the property is certified by the FCSC. Because of this, previous suits have claimed damages in the hundreds of millions, as is the case with a suit filed in July against French investment bank Société Générale S.A.
According to the complaint, none of the plaintiffs was able to file a claim with the FCSC, as they were not U.S. citizens at the time of the confiscation. And the complaint does not estimate potential damages, although Rivero said the firm did give proper notice and thus the defendants should be subject to treble damages.
In August, U.S. District Senior Judge James Lawrence King and U.S. District Judge Beth Bloom declined to toss two Helms-Burton lawsuits brought against Carnival Corp. in the Southern District of Florida — a small victory for supporters in a legal arena with little-to-no precedent.
|Similar Stories:
Lawyers Wary of Helms-Burton Litigation After Favorable Rulings, More Lawsuits
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBrazil Is Quickly Becoming a Vital LatAm Market for Greenberg Traurig, Other US Law Firms
5 minute read'Would've Been Snoring Without Ya': Fort Lauderdale Jury Awards $4.5 Million in Condo Investment Spat
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250