How to Best Control Iguanas Within Community Associations
Are residents permitted to kill the invasive, non-native species?
September 12, 2019 at 10:24 AM
4 minute read
If you live in Florida, you undoubtedly share a home with the green iguana, a non-native species that has proliferated in the tropical climate of the Sunshine State. While some residents are happy to share their territory with the reptiles, which can grow to up six feet in length and weigh more than 20 pounds, others see the lizards as a scourge on the environment and yet another example of the detrimental effects of invasive species on Florida's delicate ecosystem.
In July, the Florida Wildlife Commission (FWC) urged locals to kill the reptiles "whenever possible." Then quickly back-peddled by issuing the following statement: "Unfortunately, the message has been conveyed that we are asking the public to just go out there and shoot them up," said FWC Commissioner Rodney Barreto. "This is not what we are about; this is not the 'wild west.'"
|What Options Does a Condominium Association or HOA Have?
Homeowners and property managers are rightfully fed up with iguanas. They can uproot and eat expensive landscaping, damage roofs, pools, seawalls and even roads. If you are looking to take pest control into your own hands, attorney Alessandra Stivelman, a partner at Eisinger, Brown, Lewis, Frankel & Chaiet, recommends the following guidelines:
• According to state law and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission, killing iguanas is legal and does not require a permit if done on one's private property. Depending on an association's rules and regulations, residents might be legally entitled to kill iguanas on their private property, but it becomes much more complex in the common areas such as shared courtyards, pool areas and parking lots.
• The law stipulates that an iguana be killed in a humane manner and the carcass is properly disposed. Legal methods of iguana removal include shooting them with a pellet gun, stabbing them in the brain or even decapitating them as long as they don't suffer. Freezing, drowning and poisoning iguanas is illegal. Cruelty to an iguana is a misdemeanor of the first degree, which can be punished with a year in prison and/or a fine of $5,000.
• Due to the fact that one may not always succeed with instantaneously killing an iguana on the first attempt, it could be considered cruelty and in violation of the law. In addition, it is a huge liability for a community association if residents are firing guns of any sort or swinging shovels in an attempt to kill iguanas.
As such, property managers and anyone living in a community association must abide by all applicable local and state laws. The board of directors should consider adopting reasonable rules and regulations regarding the firing of pellet guns and the use of other weapons within the community. In addition, rules should be considered that prohibit residents from killing iguanas within the community altogether and, instead, the association should consider hiring a licensed professional for such purposes. This often requires dedicating a portion of the community's maintenance budget to iguana pest control, but from a legal standpoint, it may be a worthwhile investment to avoid potential hazards and ensure the safety of humans and reptiles alike.
Alessandra Stivelman, a partner at Eisinger Brown Lewis Frankel & Chaiet, is a board certified specialist in condominium and planned development law. She focuses her practice on community association and real estate law and can be reached at 954-894-8000 or [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
4 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250