Attorney Faces New Florida Bar Complaint, Order to Show Cause From High Court
The high court ordered litigator Phillip Timothy Howard to justify why he should not be held in contempt or face other disciplinary measures by the Florida Bar.
September 18, 2019 at 04:15 PM
4 minute read
A Tallahassee attorney tied up in a litany of litigation is now facing a show-cause order from the Florida Supreme Court, and additional charges of misconduct from the Florida Bar.
The Florida Supreme Court issued an order to show cause against Phillip Timothy Howard after a grievance committee with the state bar entered a petition asking the high court to take action against the litigator.
The Florida Bar entered a complaint against Howard the next day, alleging he was not diligent and acted incompetently while representing the plaintiffs in an Engle progeny tobacco lawsuit.
According to the Florida Bar's petition for contempt and order to show cause, Howard failed to respond to a subpoena for records in an investigation against him. An exhibit included with the petition said Howard repeatedly delivered insufficient documents to the grievance committee. Although he was asked to supply the Florida Bar with a list of clients, ledger cards, court filings and statements that would indicate how much money he was receiving for his work, the petition claimed Howard only provided bank statements for 2014 through 2016 and eventually stopped responding altogether.
"To date, no email sent to respondent's record bar email address has bounced back as invalid or undeliverable," bar counsel Shaneé L. Hinson wrote in the pleading, noting Howard had previously communicated with the bar's staff auditor via email.
The grievance committee determined Howard "failed to show good cause for failing to sufficiently respond to an official bar inquiry and that the non-compliance was willful."
The Florida Supreme Court gave Howard until Oct. 1 to respond to the show-cause order. The high court added it would deliver a reply and determination on whether to hold the attorney in contempt by Oct. 11.
Read the Florida Bar complaint:
Howard is facing a Florida Bar complaint charging him with violating several bar rules, including misusing client and trust-account funds, as well as charging excessive fees.
The new complaint filed Tuesday contends Howard and Ankur Mehta, a non-attorney who worked for the Howard & Associates law firm, failed to adequately prepare clients Richard and Margaret Harris for a lawsuit against R.J. Reynolds Tobacco. Howard was later terminated from the case, and the errata sheets he prepared were eventually deemed fraudulent by both the succeeding plaintiff's lawyer and opposing counsel.
Retired Leon Circuit Judge Karen Gievers presided over the case and denied Howard's motion for $750,000 in attorney fees and costs in May.
The complaint filed by the Florida Bar also accuses Howard of violating rules of conduct concerning competence, diligence, and the expected responsibilities of partners, managers and supervisory lawyers.
Mehta's company Mehta Consulting LLC filed a lawsuit against Howard in June for alleged unjust enrichment and breach of contract. Its complaint, which said Mehta provided "office management services" to Howard & Associates, contends the plaintiff is owed $200,000 in damages, as well as $160,000 in loans from Howard.
A February 2018 complaint entered with the bar by former Howard & Associates administrative employee Kimberly Poling said Mehta practiced law without a license while working alongside Howard. Her complaint also said the firm had ongoing problems with timely compensating employees, and called Mehta a "consigliere" of Howard's.
Howard is currently in a legal battle with Coral Gables litigator J.B. Harris, who'd previously worked alongside the attorney as his co-counsel. Harris has pursued legal action against Howard for allegedly failing to finance Engle progeny lawsuits as promised.
Howard has also been charged by the Securities and Exchange Commission with defrauding retired NFL players he was representing. The former professional athletes had retained the attorney's services in class-action litigation concerning brain injuries they sustained during their respective careers.
Howard did not respond to press inquiries by deadline.
Related stories:
Lawyer Under Florida Bar Scrutiny Sued by Associate Accused of Practicing Law Without License
South Florida Judge Orders Attorney Fees to Be Withheld from Litigator in Contract Dispute
Florida Bar Accuses Lawyer of False Accounting, Misappropriation of Paraplegic Clients' Funds
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSouth Florida Attorney Charged With Aggravated Battery After Incident in Prime Rib Line
2 minute read22-Count Indictment Is Just the Start of SCOTUSBlog Atty's Legal Problems, Experts Say
5 minute readSCOTUSblog Co-Founder Tom Goldstein Misused Law Firm Funds, According to Federal Indictment
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Choice-of-Law Issues as the UCC 2022 Amendments Come into Effect
- 2Six Benefits of Taking an Opposing Medical Expert’s Deposition
- 3Ex-Prosecutor’s Trial Ends as Judge Throws Out Her Felony Indictment in Ahmaud Arbery Death Case
- 4Conversation Catalyst: Transforming Professional Advancement Through Strategic Dialogue
- 5Trump Taps McKinsey CLO Pierre Gentin for Commerce Department GC
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250